Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S03-025
Review Name: REVISION - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/16/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/19/2007 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 07/19/2007, TO: Patricia Gehlen FROM: Laith Alshami, P.E. CDRC Engineering SUBJECT: Offices at Rillito Crossing S03-025, T13S, R14E, SECTION 27 RECEIVED: Tentative Plat on July 16, 2007 The subject submittal has been reviewed. The revised Tentative Plat is acceptable and recommended for approval pertaining to Engineering and Floodplain. |
| 07/20/2007 | CDRC1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | July 19, 2007 To: STEVE GREGOR GREGOR & GRENIER Thru: Andrea Calabro Town of Marana, Planning & Zoning Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: OFFICES AT RILLITO CROSSING, CONDOMINIUM UNITS 101-132 & 201-212 AND COMMON AREA "A" TP/DP - 1st Submittal S03-025 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plandevelopment plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. 2. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. 3. Sheet 1: Re-zoning note # 25 is identical to General note #6. Eliminate one of the notes. 4. Sheet 1: Add a General note explaining what you are proposing to do with the sewer line. 5. Sheet 1: Show the public and private sewer lines using different line-types, so that they can readily be distinguished from each other. Also, show and describe examples of these different line types in the legend on Sheet 1. There should be a symbol for existing sewer verses proposed as well. 6. Sheet 2: The existing public sewer line in Paradise Falls should be marked as public and existing. Also show the plan # for the public sewer line. The public manholes within 100' of property should be marked w/IMS#'s. 7. Sheet 2: The private sewer lines which are existing should be marked as private and existing. 8. Sheet 2: All of the BCS shown on plan should be marked as private and the slope/length and material of pipe should be shown on plan. 9. Sheet 2: With the proposed 6"BCS the line going to Blg. #6 it should connect into a new manhole at least 5' away from existing MH #2. Also where each of the 6" BCS for the other buildings shown on plan connecting to the 10" sewer line a manhole should be installed at each of the connection points. 10. Sheet 2: Manholes w/rim and invert elevations should be located at all intersections and bends of the 6" BCS. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of blue lines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 07/31/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 31, 2007 Bob Tenor, RLS Gregor Engineering, Inc. 5232 East Pima Street, Suite A Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: S03-025 Offices at Rillito Crossing Revised Tentative Plat Dear Bob: Your submittal of July 16, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 3 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Wastewater, Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 3191181 Tp-resubmittal |
| 07/31/2007 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: S03-025 Offices at Rillito Crossing Tentative Plat/Development Plan Revision TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 25, 2007 DUE DATE: August 13, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The required parking calculation used for Building 2 suggest that the proposed use will be for a medical office (1:175). Please add medical to the parking data for Building 2. 2. Please clarify if the new medical use is possibly for rehabilitation and/or outpatient physical therapy facilities. If these could be potential uses for this building then the amount of accessible parking spaces must be increased to twenty (20) percent of the portion of patient and visitor parking spaces serving these facilities. A note can be placed on the tentative plat/development plan restricting these uses entirely from this site. IBC 2006 Sec. 1106.4 3. Bicycle parking provided on the DP does not meet the requirements of DS 2-09. Per DS 2-09.4.1 Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than fifty (50) feet from the main building entrance(s) and will be along the front side of the building as well as along other sides of the building that has an entrance. Bicycle access through the development will be separate from the pedestrian ways. Vehicular access may be used as bicycle access. Bicycle access to a parking facility may cross a pedestrian way at a right angle (DS2-09.3.2). Multiple rack bicycle parking require a minimum thirty (30) inches between spaces of posts or racks (DS 2-09.5.1.A). The surface of the facility can be surfaced the same as for motor vehicle parking or with a minimum of one (1) inch thickness of one-fourth (1/4) inch aggregate material. DS 2-09 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 837-4960. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S03-025tp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan/tentative plat, and additional requested documents. |