Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S03-024
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/09/2004 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 01/09/2004 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | To: Craig Gross Planning Administrator SUBJECT: Pantano's Edge Tentative Plat S03-024 (Third Review) T14S, R15E, Section 28 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat and Drainage Report The Tentative Plat (TP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Tentative Plat: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies with re-submittal. 2. The sediment transport or erosion analysis for determination of the horizontal extent of the proposed bank protection must be completed prior to tentative plat approval to ensure the viability of the lots as shown on the tentative plat. Again, a sediment transport analysis is required prior to the approval of the tentative plat. Again, this is to determine the depth of the proposed soil cement bank protection. Per previous comment. 3. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles at the SE corner of Golf Links and Camino Seco per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. Sight visibility Triangles need to be measured 20' back from the face of curb or the edge of pavement. The SVT at the SE corner of is correct, but the SVT's at the entrances off Camino Seco need to be shown at the edge of pavement. I apologize for any confusion, please call if you need clarification. 4. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. Per previous comment. Scuppers are required for all pedestrian access; this includes the sidewalks leading to the front door of the residence. Please comply. Per your correspondence with Matt Flick (via e-mail on 12-26-03) it is clear that the COT requires scuppers in the sidewalks. A note regarding the placement of scuppers, where needed, on the TP will satisfy this comment. The paragraph below is an excerpt from the above mentioned e-mail: Colleen: Comment #12 of Paul's review and your response both refer only to DS 3-01.4.4. DS 2-08.3.1 and 3-01.2.8 also apply. By development standard, the sidewalks to the homes would also be required to take the 10-year flow under. Paul was technically correct with the assertion about the 10-year flows. By unwritten policy, the Development Services Department Engineering Division rarely enforces this for small single-family residence developments where only the drainage from one lot (or portion thereof) is crossing the sidewalk at any one location. Where drainage is combined from multiple lots or the lots are large and generate larger flows, sidewalks should be free of floodwater for the 10-year event. Matt Flick, P.E. Engineering Manager Development Services Department City of Tucson Drainage Report: 1. The Drainage Report is accepted for TP purposes only. 2. Please show the project address on the cover of the Drainage report. The address is available upon request from Pima County Addressing. For future reference, the single page submitted or any other addendum(s) to the Drainage Report will not be accepted. The DR can be modified at the counter if so desired. 3. The sediment transport or erosion analysis for determination of the horizontal extent of the proposed bank protection must be completed prior to tentative plat approval to ensure the viability of the lots as shown on the tentative plat. Please complete a sediment transport analysis. This is to determine the depth of the soil cement bank protection. Per previous comment. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 01/09/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S03-024 Pantano Edge 01/12/04 (x) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (x) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: c9-02-17 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: South Pantano Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Yes COMMENTS DUE BY: 1/09/04 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (x) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (x) Resubmittal Required: (x) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (x) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: 1/09/04 Comprehensive Planning Task Force Comments S03-024 - Pantano's Edge Tentative Plat Review January 9, 2004 Staff offers the following revisions/comments: The Bold, Italic, and Underline words are only for your reference and not intended to be transferred onto your tentative plat or landscape plan revisions. 1.) Staff's comment not addressed on previous submittals dated 9/29/03 and 11/24/03: Please revise all pertinent sheets in the tentative plat to comply with rezoning condition # 14, (C9-02-17) by revising tentative plat, dated November 5, 2003, sheet 6 of 6, cross section "C", to provide a pedestrian easements as indicated on the preliminary development plan dated November 22, 2002 1.a) Staff's current comments on tentative plat, dated December 23, 2003: A). As in previous staff comments dated 11/24/03, please revise tentative plat, sheet 6 of 6, channel cross-section "C" to include the required pedestrian easements, which are to be a minimum of twenty-feet wide and each easement shall include an all-weather six-foot wide pedestrian path, and shall include canopy trees and low ground cover planting. The typical "cross-section "C," as currently shown on tentative plat, dated December 23, 2003, is identical to previous tentative plat dated November 5, 2003. Sheet 6 of 6 still shows a 4:1 slope on both sides of the channel. Please revise and provide an accurate rendering that provides a workable location for the all-weather six-foot wide pedestrian paths. An acceptable example of a cross-section that shows landscape requirements is shown on the tentative plat sheet 6 of 6, cross-section "B, "for the linear park. |
| 01/09/2004 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | To: Craig Gross Planning Administrator SUBJECT: Pantano's Edge Tentative Plat S03-024 (Fourth Review) T14S, R15E, Section 28 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat and Drainage Report The Tentative Plat (TP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Tentative Plat: 1. The TP is conditionally approved upon the review of the mylar and the minor changes that have agreed to be shown. Drainage Report: 1. The Drainage Report is accepted for TP purposes only. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 01/09/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S03-024 Pantano Edge 01/15/04 (x) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (x) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: c9-02-17 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: South Pantano Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Yes COMMENTS DUE BY: 1/09/04 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (X) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached (X) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: 1/13/04 Comprehensive Planning Task Force Comments S03-024 – Pantano’s Edge Tentative Plat Review January 13, 2004 Staff offers the following revisions/comments: Due to clarification of previous submittal, staff approves S03-024. A resubmittal no longer is required as indicated on our comments dated 1/09/04. |