Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S03-024
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/02/2003 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/03/2003 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Tentative Plat is approved 9/3/03 |
| 09/08/2003 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Review Requests File Number Description Date Reviewed E Pima Association of Governments Transportation Planning Division 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 Fax: (520) 792-9151 www.pagnet.org S03-024 Pantano's Edge 9/5/2003 1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street 2. Is improvement planned as part of the 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program Planned Action: STREET IDENTIFICATION 3. Existing Daily Volume – Based on Average Daily Traffic 4. Existing Daily Capacity- Level of Service “E” 5. Existing Number of Lanes 9. Estimated Traffic Generation for Proposed Development (Expressed in Average 24 Hr. Vehicle Trips) 8. Future Number of Lanes TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS 10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) 11. Existing or Planned Bikeway Remarks: Street Number 1 Street Number 2 Year Year Planned Action: VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS 6. Future Daily Volume - Adopted Plan System Completed 7. Future Daily Capacity - Level of Service “E” Camino Seco (Escalante to Golf Links) No 0 8,400 23,500 2 23,500 19,338 2 679 Route 3, 30 minutes,0.5 miles None Golf Links (Pantano to Camino Seco) No 0 33,885 63,000 6 31,279 63,000 6 Route 17, 30 Minutes, 0.1 miles Bike route with striped shoulder |
| 09/12/2003 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586 Director FAX: (520) 740-6380 November 21, 2003 TO: Colleen Stoetzel / Bruce Paton, Rick Engineering Company THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division SUBJECT: Pantano’s Edge, Lots 1-71 and Common Areas A-1 thru A-3, and B-1 thru B-3 Tentative Plat - 1st and 2nd Submittals S03-024 We have reviewed the above-referenced project on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. Insufficient wastewater review fees have been submitted for this tentative plat. The wastewater review fees required by Pima County Ordinance 2003-29 apply to all pages of an initial submittal, because we have to review all of the sheets to understand how the proposed sewers interact and/or interfere with the other features. This tentative plat consisted of 6 pages, and the proper wastewater review fee for the initial submittal of this tentative plat is $466.00. Only $416.00 of this amount has been submitted, as shown on the attached receipt. Please submit a $50.00 check for the remainder of the 1st submittal wastewater review fees for the tentative plat (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) to this office at the earliest opportunity. 2. Rick Engineering elected to make the 2nd submittal of this tentative plat, before this office had reviewed the 1st submittal with the understanding that this did not create any obligation by this office to approve the 2nd submittal, or to expedite any necessary subsequent submittals. This office reviewed the 2nd submittal in the 1st submittal’s place in our queue of plans to review. As the 1st submittal was not reviewed, no 2nd submittal review fees are due. Any necessary subsequent submittal will be subject to such fees, however. 3. The following comments apply to the 2nd submittal. 4. This project will be tributary to both the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility and the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Pantano and North Rillito Interceptors. Per PCWWM Planning Services, there is currently treatment and conveyance system capacity in the existing downstream sewerage system for this development. This response is not to be construed as a commitment for treatment or conveyance capacity allocation, but rather an analysis of the existing sewerage system as of this date. 5. Based on the preliminary sewer layout as shown on the referenced tentative plat, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. However, a final determination of this status cannot be made until approval of the sewer construction plans and/or preparation of the sewer service agreement. 6. Sheets 2, 3 & 4: Show the 10" existing sewer line, I-68-4, in the Camino Seco right-of-way. 7. Sheets 4 & 5: Show the 10" existing sewer line, I-65-51, in the Camino Seco right-of-way. 8. Sheets 4 & 5: Show the 10" existing sewer line, G-70-01, in the Camino Seco right-of-way 9. Sheet 6: Show the proposed public sewers in Cross Section A. 10. We have no objection to this tentative plat, however, until the remainder of the 1st submittal wastewater review fees have been paid, we cannot approve it. Please submit a set of the revised bluelines and a copy of the receipt for the remainder of the wastewater 1st submittal wastewater review fees to this office at the earliest opportunity. The cover letter accompanying the revised bluelines and receipt must clearly state, FOR EXPEDITED REVIEW PER TIM ROWE’S 11/21/03 REVIEW LETTER. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6563. Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division TR/tr Attach: Receipt for 1st submittal dated 08/29/03 Copy: Project |
| 09/12/2003 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S03-024 RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. PANTANO'S EDGE |
| 09/12/2003 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S03-024 PANTANO’S EDGE/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: September 8, 2003 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Change “Sarnoff Rd.” to “Sarnoff Drive” on Location Map. Add Road to “Golf Links” on pg. 1. Label “Pena Blanca Drive” on pg. 1. Include lines to divide lots that are shown on other pages. Change “Fon-Du-Lac Drive” to Fond Du Lac Drive on pg. 4. Label Fond Du Lac Drive on pg. 1. Change “Morman Drive” to “Mormon Drive” on pg. 5. Label approved interior street names on Final Plat. |
| 09/24/2003 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: Pantano's Edge Lots 1-71 S03-024 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the City of Tucson tentative plat submitted for review dated August 22, 2003. The preliminary point where TEP will serve this project is from units 33 and 79 on Camino Seco proceeding through the interior of the subdivision. Enclosed is a copy of TEP's facility map showing the approximate location and unit numbers of the existing facilities. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tucsonelectric.com (520) 884-3882 |
| 09/25/2003 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Craig Gross DATE: September 25, 2003 Planning Administrator SUBJECT: Pantano's Edge Tentative Plat S03-024 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 28 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat and Drainage Report. The Tentative Plat (TP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Tentative Plat: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies with re-submittal. 2. Please include a copy of the preliminary Development Plan Dated November 22, 2002 with next submittal. 3. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 4. Add general note stating permission from DSD was granted to eliminate any retention basins because of the proximity to Pantano Wash. 5. The minimum setback for a straight section of the Pantano Wash is 350' per Chapter 26-7 of the floodplain ordinance. 6. Soil protection should be provided at the channels called out by section C on page 6. See note 4 of the DR. Please revise. 7. Show headwall connection to drainage pipes from the drainage channels and into the Pantano Wash. 8. Show compliance with rezoning condition 3, in particular the right turn deceleration lanes at each entrance and provide the amount stated in the rezoning condition. 9. Per rezoning condition no. 6. Please provide a timetable for completing a CLOMR and/or LOMR for the revision to the federally mapped Pantano Wash. Coordination with Suzanne Shields at the Pima County flood control district, 740-6350, is advised. This review was done assuming the acceptance of the CLOMR and/or LOMR by FEMA. Should the CLOMR be denied or significantly modified form it's present form, a new review will be required. 10. Show the pedestrian easements per rezoning condition 14. 11. The typical cross section on sheet 6 of 6 does not meet rezoning condition number 20 which is to provide parking on both sides of the street and a 5' wide sidewalk. See newly adopted street cross sections in D.S. 3-01.0. Please revise. 12. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. 13. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15. 14. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles at the SE corner of Golf Links and Camino Seco per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 15. Add general note: "Grading of the development parcel shall not occur more than four (4) months before construction." 16. Please show dimensioned right-of-way (Golf Links Road), including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 17. Provide a 5' sidewalk along the entire west edge of the development, revise the typical cross section A on sheet 6 and call out the parking lane on that section per D.S. 3-01.3.3.A. 18. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 19. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 20. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. 21. Show Tentative Plat number (S03-024) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 22. Please provide adjacent property grades for review in accordance with in 2000 IBC section 13 concerning fills. 23. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 24. A permit will be necessary for any work performed within the public drainage way of the Pantano Wash. The construction of the drainage pipes through the soil cement bank protection is not permitted, contact Yash Desai at Transportation at (520) 791-5100 for pertinent information. Also contact Suzanne Shields at the Pima County flood control district, 740-6350, for county requirements. 25. Show point of access for lots 52-53 and 68-69. 26. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 27. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 28. A Stormwater pollution prevention plan is required. Contact Paul P. Machado at 791-5550 x1193 for additional information. Drainage Report: 1. On page 3 in section 2.0 of the DR it is stated that the existing RAC is 5 residences per acre, therefore 35% impervious area was used in the hydrologic computations. Then on page 5 in section 2.3 it is stated that areas with a RAC is between 3 and 5, 60% impervious cover for was used for developed conditions for the hydrologic data computations. To remain consistent, please use 60% impervious area in all the computations. Please revise. 2. Add a statement in the DR that permission from DSD was granted to eliminate any retention basins because of the proximity to Pantano Wash. 3. Per rezoning condition no. 6. Please provide a timetable for completing a CLOMR and/or LOMR for the revision to the federally mapped Pantano Wash. Coordination with Suzanne Shields at the Pima County flood control district, 740-6350, is advised. This review was done assuming the acceptance of the CLOMR and/or LOMR by FEMA. Should the CLOMR be denied or significantly modified form it's present form, a new review will be required. 4. Soil protection should be provided if the velocities dictate at the channels called out by section C on page 6. Please revise and/or show calculations for the velocities. 5. The min. setback from the top of bank of the Pantano Wash along a straight section of the wash is 350'. Otherwise please provide record drawings (may be available in the 5th floor at 201 N. Stone Ave.) that the bank protection along the Pantano Wash was designed for the 100-year event. 6. A permit will be necessary for any work performed within the public drainage way of the Pantano Wash. The construction of the drainage pipes through the soil cement bank protection is not permitted, contact Yash Desai at Transportation at (520) 791-5100 for pertinent information. Also contact Suzanne Shields at the Pima County flood control district, 740-6350, for county requirements. 7. Please adhere to rezoning condition no. 4. Please address. 8. A $150.00 review fee for the Drainage Report is required. 9. Please show the project address on the cover of the Drainage report. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 09/29/2003 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: September 26, 2003 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S03-024 Pantano’s Edge T141528 (136-14) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat. Add the bearings for the lot lines and add the complete curve data. Add the section tie. If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan C. King |
| 09/29/2003 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is September 1, 2004. 2. This project has been assigned subdivision case number S03-024. Please note the case number in the lower right corner of each sheet on all plans. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.1 3. The typical street cross section detailed on sheet 6 of 6 must comply with the recently revised street requirements. Refer to Development Standards 3-01 figure 2. For additional information please contact the Engineering Section reviewer for this project. D.S. 2-03.2.4.G 4. Add the 25-foot perimeter yard setback line to all sheets which have lots abutting SR zoning. In addition, lot number seven (7) is adjacent to SR zoning along a portion of its north lot line therefore requiring a 25 foot setback along that portion of the lot line. D.S. 2-05.2.4.M 5. The Final Plat may not be approved until the CC&R's are reviewed and approved by the Zoning Review Section. The CC&R's must meet criteria listed in L.U.C. 3.6.1.5. If applicable, the CC&R's must also detail the restrictions on any proposed natural areas. D.S. 2-10.3.2.E 6. Keynote number eight (8) should be added to all applicable lots as required by rezoning condition number 15. 7. All requested revisions must be made to the plat, Landscape and NPPO plans. D.S. 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
| 10/02/2003 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this T.P. 1. Add a general note to read "All non-signalized intersection street names must have E-W block number addresses for E-W roadways and N-S block number addresses for N-S roadways." 2. No parking in cul-de-sacs shall be from the PRC to a point directly opposite the PRC. (See figure 21 DS 3-01.0). Show no parking signs in northern cul-de-sac in correct locations. 3. Rezoning condition 3.B on sheet 6 of 6 states "Owner/Developer shall install interim left turn and right turn/deceleration lanes on Camino Seco at both access points to the site." There are notes throughout the plan set indicating additional pavement for the left turn lanes but none are indicated for the right turn/deceleration lanes. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dkelch1@ci.tucson.az.us |
| 10/02/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | The landscape does not recommend approval at this time. Revise all plans as requested by other agencies and as outlined in the following comments. 1) Revise the landscape legend to indicate compliance with the conditions of rezoning which require an 8' wide decomposed granite path. C9-02-17. 2) Revise all plans to include a reference to the related rezoning case C9-02-17. The Tentative Plat currently lists Co9-02-17. 3) Include the CDRC case number S03-024 an all plan sheets. DS 2-03.2.0 4) Revise the tentative plat and related plans to provide consistent information regarding any dedications. The landscape plans differ in the description of the dedications. 5) The tentative plat includes work on sheets 4 and 5 for channel section D which appears to be outside of the scope of the Native Plant Preservation Plan submitted. |
| 10/03/2003 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S03-024 Pantano Edge 10/03/03 (x) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (x) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: c9-02-17 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: South Pantano Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Yes COMMENTS DUE BY: 9/29/03 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (x) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (x) Resubmittal Required: (x) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (x) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: 9/29/03 Comprehensive Planning Task Force Comments S03-024 – Pantano’s Edge Tentative Plat Review September 30, 2003 Staff offers the following comments: The Bold, Italic, and Underline words are only for your reference and not intended to be transferred onto your tentative plat or landscape plan revisions. Please revise all pertinent sheets in the tentative plat and/or landscape plan to comply with rezoning condition # 9, (C9-02-17) by revising/adding text, illustrations, and cross-sections on sheets providing details on the Pantano-River Park amenities adjacent to the proposed site. Revise sheets to indicate the River Park shall include a twelve (12) foot wide paved path and a eight (8) foot wide meandering natural surface path. Please revise all pertinent sheets in the landscape plan to comply with rezoning condition # 13, (C9-02-17) by revising/adding text, illustrations, and cross sections to indicate a paved pathway of ten (10) feet in width with landscaping along its southern edge shall be provided along the northern edge of the subject project linking the River Park with the intersection of Golf Links Road and Camino Seco. The Pathway may be located within the public right-of-way of Golf Links Road if sufficient space exist. Current submittal does not provide this information (other than the rezoning notes), neither in the tentative plat or landscape plan sheets. Please revise all pertinent sheets in the tentative plat and the landscape plan to comply with rezoning condition # 14, (C9-02-17) by revising/adding text, illustrations, and cross sections to indicate pedestrian easements as located and shown on the preliminary development plan dated November 22, 2002. Pedestrian easements are to be a minimum of twenty-four feet wide, each with an all-weather six-foot wide pedestrian path, and shall include canopy trees and low ground cover planting. The preliminary development plan, dated November 22, 2002, provides four (4) pedestrian easements linking the Camino Seco right-of-way and the Golf Links/Camino Seco intersection by way of this subdivision to the River Park amenities. See attached copy of the preliminary development plan. Please revise the tentative plat and landscape plan to comply with rezoning condition # 16 (C9-02-17), by providing a scaled “view wall” cross section, designed to comply with rezoning condition # 16, as required for lots abutting along the River Park edge. |
| 10/06/2003 | DOROTHY ROBLES | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | no comments |
| 10/06/2003 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: October 6, 2003 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, Project S03-024 Pantano's Edge: Tentative Plat CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Landscape Plan: Too many Desert Willow specified along river park pathways. Use trees that provide more shade such as Velvet Mesquite. Shade trees should be spaced no more than 40 ft apart along pathway and trail. Landscape Plan, Sheet 3: Trail located to close to wall at lots 21-25. Indicate location of eventual top of bank protection and indicate level grade for river park corridor between residential wall and top of bank protection. Contact Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation, 791-4873 x 215 to discuss possibility of exchanging Camino Seco right of way for additional river park corridor. Please feel free to call me at 791-4873 x 215 if you have any questions. |