Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Review Detail

Plan Number: S03-020
Parcel: Unknown

Address:
1315 E BANTAM RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Plan Number - S03-020
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/08/2003 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
08/20/2003 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved NO COMMENT
S03-020
CHRISTOPHER BROZEK AICP PE
AMHERST SOUTH II
08/20/2003 FRODRIG2 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved Case Number: S03-020
Project Name: Amherst South II
Estimated Traffic Generation: 239 trips
08/25/2003 FRODRIG2 PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Denied 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: D03-0038 RITA RANCH MEDICAL CENTER/DEVELOPMENT PLAN
DATE: October 9, 2003



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:

1.) Number buildings numerically on Sheet 2.
08/25/2003 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Approved 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: S03-020 AMHERST SOUTH II/TENTATIVE PLAT
DATE: August 25, 2003



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project.

NOTE: Tentative Plat is approved with the condition that “A” Circle is replaced with an approved street name on Final Plat.


***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.***
08/28/2003 GLYNDA ROTHWELL UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved SUBJECT: AMHERST SOUTH II
Lots 1-25
S03-020

Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the City of Tucson
tentative plat submitted for review dated August 8, 2003.

The preliminary point where TEP will serve this project is from the existing
poles #1 and #2 proceeding through the interior of the subdivision.
Enclosed is a copy of TEP's facility map showing the approximate location
and unit numbers of the existing facilities.

All relocation costs for the existing electrical facilities will be billable
to the developer. at the customer's request, a design can be provided prior
to the Approved Tentative Plat, however, once a design is provided, any
design changes will be billable to the developer.

Liza Castillo
Land Management
Tucson Electric Power Company
lcastillo@tucsonelectric.com
(520) 884-3882
09/04/2003 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Denied COMMENTS
CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD

1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is August 7, 2004.

2. This project has been assigned subdivision case number S03-020. Please note the subdivision case number in the lower right corner of each sheet on all plans.
D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.1

3. List the proposed use of the property.
D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.2

4. Add the following general note: "This plat is designed to meet the Residential Cluster Project (RCP) overlay zone criteria LUC Sec. 3.6.1".
D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.7

5. Rezoning case number C9-80-76 listed in the lower right corner of the sheet does not apply to this site. Please delete from sheet.

6. Per D.S. 3-01.2.4.D, local streets must be designed with parking on both sides of the street, unless parking is provided in common areas distributed throughout the subdivision, at a ratio of one (1) parking space per dwelling within the subdivision. For additional comments regarding street requirements please refer to Engineering Review comments.
D.S. 2-03.2.4.G/ LUC 3.6.1.4.F.2

7. Residential cluster development with density increase must meet at least one (1) of the development categories and the provisions of LUC Sec. 3.6.1.4, Development Criteria. Provide criteria for density increase.
LUC 3.6.1.4.B

8. When developed with a density increase, the RCP must provide for conveniently located commonly-owned recreation facilities, designed for, and usable by, both adults and children residing within the project. Twenty-five (25) percent of the site area that is not part of the site coverage is to be commonly owned or set aside as accessible to all residents of the development.
LUC 3.6.1.4.A.2

9. Barrier-free accessibility must be provided to twenty-five percent of the ground floor units and all common areas within the project. Indicate how this accessibility is to be provided, and add a detail to the plat showing the accessibility. In addition, label those units which are proposed for barrier free accessibility on the plan.
LUC 3.6.1.4.A.5/ D.S. 2-10.3.1.D

10. Add a general note which states "All mechanical equipment shall be screened from adjacent streets exterior to the project and from adjacent existing residential development. Screening shall be architecturally integrated with the overall design of the RCP" and demonstrate the type of screening proposed.
LUC 3.6.1.4.A.9

11. Add the following general note: "There shall be no further division of land or resubdivision without the developer or successor in interest furnishing written notice to all property owners of record within the boundaries of the RCP. In no event shall further division of land occur without the written approval of the Mayor and Council."
LUC 3.6.1.4.A.10

12. Site coverage calculation may not be verified for compliance until comment number eight (8) has been addressed.
LUC 3.6.1.4.B/ D.S. 2-10.3.1.C

13. Per LUC Sec. 3.2.6.54.B.2.b.3, the setback between the garage/carport and edge of street pavement must be eight (8) feet or less. Street cross section shows 10 feet.
LUC 3.2.6.5.E

14. Accessory structures (i.e. garage/carport) are not allowed in the buildable area extending the full width of the lot between the principal structure and the front street lot line.
L.U.C. 3.2.5.3.C

15. The Final Plat may not be approved until the CC&R's are reviewed and approved by the Zoning Review Section. The CC&R's must meet criteria listed in L.U.C. 3.6.1.5. If applicable, the CC&R's must also detail the restrictions on any proposed natural areas.
D.S. 2-10.3.2.E

16. All requested revisions must be made to the plat, Landscape and NPPO plans.
D.S. 2-07.2.1.A

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608.
09/05/2003 DALE KELCH COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied Traffic Engineering REJECTS this T.P.:

1. Add the general note "All non-signalized intersection street names must have E-W block number addresses for E-W roadways and N-S block number addresses for N-S roadways."
2. Show and label SVT's from "A" Circle onto Bantam Road
3. Show no parking signs in section "A"

D. Dale Kelch, EIT
Senior Engineering Associate
Traffic Engineering Division
(520)791-4259x305
(520)791-5526 (fax)
dkelch1@ci.tucson.az.us
09/05/2003 ELIZABETH EBERBACH ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied SUBJECT: Amherst South II Tentative Plat Engineering Review
REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach
DATE: September 4, 2003
ACTIVITY NUMBER: S03-020

SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat, Landscape Plan, NPPO documents, and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on August 8, 2003. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat or the Drainage Report. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only.

DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS:
1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No. 10-01.II.3: Explain how retention is being met; the volume appears lower than the calculated volume requirement. Page 2 of drainage report shows only 7% reduction of the Q100 for detention; provide table or calculation showing 15% reduction for the 100-year detention reduction.
2) DS Sec.10-01.V.2.5: Address the following on drainage map entitled "Tentative Plat" in the drainage report:
a) Label exhibit as a drainage report exhibit.
b) Show existing watershed delineation with existing contours.
3) COT Code Sec.26-7 & 29-15(b)(1): Address the following for erosion hazard setback:
a) Provide status of existing and proposed bank protection along Rodeo Wash.
b) Bank protection plans indicate that the Rodeo Wash is designed for 25-year erosion hazard protection only. In Drainage report, explain how development will be protected from erosion potential in Rodeo Wash.
c) Provide calculations for 100-year erosion hazard setback line for flowrate above the gabion protected area.
d) Delineate erosion hazard setback line on drainage exhibit.
4) COT Code Sec.26-8(c): Per Floodplain and Erosion Hazard Management code, delineate and label FEMA Zone A limits at north end of project along Rodeo Wash per FEMA on the Drainage Exhibit. Also provide and label 100-year floodplain delineation with water surface elevations for Rodeo Wash on drainage exhibit. Provide statement in drainage report regarding whether there is any proposed encroachment into the FEMA special flood hazard area limits.
5) Provide minimum finished floor elevations in Drainage Report.
6) DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a: Discuss results of infiltration testing in drainage report to demonstrate the drain time for the retained stormwater for any proposed basin meets the maximum disposal time.
7) DS Sec.10-02.1.5.1: How will basin area be accessed? Show that volume of basin is derived from a basin configuration that includes an access ramp.
8) DS Sec.10-02.14.3.2: The maintenance notes specified in SMDDFM 14.3.2 must be included on the Final Plat or in the CC&Rs. If they are in the CC&Rs, provide a copy of the CC&Rs with the resubmittal.
9) DS Sec.10-01.V.2.4: Explain in the report how all drainage is discharged into water harvesting areas or detention/retention basins prior to discharge into Rodeo Wash.
10) Show any proposed curb inlets and scuppers. See Section 10.6.9 of the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (SMDDFM) for appropriate clogging factors.
11) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.I: Identify and label with square footage of open spaces, drainage areas, and other common areas.
12) List the administrative / site address on the front cover of report.
13) DS Sec.10-01.V.2.6: Provide existing and proposed elevations for each basin spillway. For channel at the north side, provide velocity at street exit where flow enters channel, and label D50 and thickness of proposed riprap.

W.A.S.H. REPORT:
14) COT Code Sec. 29-15(b)(1): Address the following comments for W.A.S.H. Ordinance compliance:
a) Per this section, provide a W.A.S.H. Report with complete discussions regarding any effects on hydrology and hydraulics to the 50-foot Study Area due to the elements as outlined in section 29-15(b)(1)a through i. Also, in the W.A.S.H. report, present the resources within 50-foot Study Area and provide a description of proposed mitigation as shown on the Mitigation-Revegetation sheets.
b) Delineate the allocated W.A.S.H. Ordinance 50-foot Study Area on plan view for all Mitigation-Revegetation and Tentative Plat sheets.
c) Delineate the Resource Area on all Mitigation-Revegetation and Tentative Plat sheets.
d) Per the W.A.S.H. Ordinance, no disturbance of the resource area is allowed without mitigation as described in this section of code. In W.A.S.H. report provide discussion of proposed mitigation conforming to this section of code.
e) Explain whether this project needs to go in front of Mayor and Council for approval of concrete (outlet structures) in W.A.S.H. wash.
15) COT Code Sec.29-16(a): The applicant shall demonstrate in the W.A.S.H. report why the resource area cannot be left in its natural condition.
16) The W.A.S.H. Ordinance has a separate time line for acceptance, review, and approvals than the plat. Some information (sediment transport, for example) which is normally not present in reports for tentative platting is necessary in the W.A.S.H. hydraulic information. It is suggested that a checklist be prepared by the consultant to accompany the W.A.S.H. submittal. This checklist should virtually mirror the items listed in Sec. 29-15(b)(1) of the W.A.S.H. Ordinance.
17) Any W.A.S.H. submittal should be noted on the transmittal form so that CDRC staff are aware of the time line for which the 5-day acceptance period begins.

TENTATIVE PLAT COMMENTS:
18) COT Code Sec.26-8(c): Delineate and label FEMA Zone A floodplain limits at north end of project along Rodeo Wash per FEMA on Tentative Plat. Also provide and label 100-year floodplain delineation with water surface elevations for Rodeo Wash on Tentative Plat.
19) DS Sec.3-01.2.4.D: Regarding street section configuration, address the following per updated street section:
a) Provide 5-foot wide sidewalk.
b) Provide 2-foot clear space between curb and sidewalk, when wedge curb is proposed.
c) Engineering section will allow sidewalk placement only adjacent to back of vertical curb.
d) Show utility easement in section view.
e) Update General Note 8 to reflect parking.
20) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.J: Provide in legend:
a) proposed street survey monuments
b) existing floodplain limits / post-developed floodplain limits
c) water surface contour interval symbol
21) Provide spot elevations for entrances to storm drainage inlets.
22) DS Sec.10-02.1.5.1: Provide access / maintenance easements to the drainage channels and basins.
23) DS Sec.3-01.4.2.D: Provide sidewalk ramps.
24) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.A.1: Provide owner's name and phone number on Tentative Plat.
25) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.B.1: Provide subdivision case number "S03-020" at lower right hand corner next to title block.
26) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.C.2.a & b: All lots encumbered by this floodplain must be listed in the general notes. Floodplain use permit is required for any approved disturbance in the floodplain. If any portion of the development falls within a floodplain, floodplain use permit(s) will be required. Provide a general note stating that the construction of the affected lots (if any) will require floodplain use permits; add section (b) as a general note.
27) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.B.7: Clarify General Note 9 to include drainage facilities.
28) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.C.3: This project shall comply with the W.A.S.H. ordinance. Add an additional general note that the W.A.S.H. ordinance is applicable. Revise and state that the plat is designed to comply with this regulation.
29) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.E: Label pipe diameters for all existing utilities. Show closest existing fire hydrant on plan view with dimension from site.
30) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.J: Clarify and show delineations for all floodplain lines (Existing Condition 100-year Floodplain Limits, Developed Condition 100-year Floodplain Limits, and FEMA 100-year Floodplain Limits). The FEMA floodplain limits must be platted unless a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) or physical map revision is obtained prior to platting of this site.
31) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.A: Provide local benchmark location for the site. Clarify and show proposed location and type of subdivision control monuments and tie to permanent survey monuments or to the nearest section or quarter section corner.
32) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.B: Check boundary bearings, distances. Data shall match title report exhibit which references Bk40 pg12, Block "A" data. Label data on plan view as recorded / measured / calculated. Provide one copy of boundary closure calculations.
33) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.C: Show all existing easements with recordation information, locations, widths, and purposes on the Tentative Plat. Add curve data (delta, arclength, and radius) for curve in utility easement. If the easement is not in use, so indicate.
34) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.D: Provide street cross section with right-of-way dimensions for Bantam Road.
35) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.G & Sec.6-01.4.1.I: Provide cul-de-sac or knuckle per street standards at north end of "A" Circle.
36) Tucson Code Sec.26-8(d)2: Delineate erosion hazard setback line on Tentative Plat.
37) IBC Chap. 36 Sec.13.1: Provide pad elevations for the each building pad. Those pads along the site boundaries shall meet grading standards for the two-foot differential limit, otherwise the procedures for differential grading outlined in this section shall apply.
38) DS Sec.3-01.6.4.A: Southeast angle of intersection shall be radial from Bantam Road. Check radius for curb returns.
39) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.1: Show ponding limits / water surface elevation for the detention basins on plan view per Drainage Report.
40) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.4: Clarify and provide more proposed spot elevations - specifically around pads showing drainage. Also provide proposed spot elevations in channel at the north side. Provide velocity at street exit where flow enters channel and label D50 and thickness.

LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS:
41) LUC 3.7.4: Show / explain how water harvesting will be provided on Landscape Plan.
42) Show sight visibility triangles for existing and proposed conditions.

GENERAL COMMENTS:
43) DS Sec.10-02.14.2.6: Provide a soils report regarding suitability and feasibility of the project; the report should discuss existing geotechnical conditions, and proposed recommendations for foundations and pavement design. Infiltration test results will be required to be submitted. The geotechnical report shall specifically address all criteria listed in this section. See last sentence of this section for items 6 (c) & (d) regarding hydro-collapsing soils and 30-foot test boring for basin design. Infiltration rates shall meet Water Harvesting and Detention / Retention criteria per DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a.
44) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.5: Show any drainage easements along Rodeo Wash. Verification is required for any drainage solution occurring outside the boundaries of the plat is constructed with adjacent owners' permission. (Submit any additional notarized documentation of acceptance of any proposed drainage structures with drainage report.)
45) IBC Chapter 36, Section 9: A Grading Plan and Permit will be required. Proposed developments exceeding 5 acres are subject to NPDES requirements. Contact Loren Makus, 791-4251 for submittal requirements at grading plan review stage.

The next submittal should address all the above items per Development Standards section 2-03. Submit soils report, revised Drainage Report, revised Landscape Plan, W.A.S.H. Report, and revised Tentative Plat. Schedule a meeting to go over comments. If you have any questions, please call me at 791-5550 extension 2204.

Elizabeth Eberbach, PE
Civil Engineer
Engineering Section
Development Services
09/05/2003 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Denied DATE: September 5, 2003

TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services

FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation

SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, Project S03-020 Amherst South II: Tentative Plat Review

CC: Craig Gross, Development Services
Luis Lara, Parks and Recreation


Applicant shall dedicate a 20ft wide, exclusive, public, non-motorized recreational trail easement along Rodeo Wash for the Rodeo Wash Urban Trail. The easement shall not be subject to any caveats or limits. The easement shall be located on relatively flat land that is developable for a trail. Drainage structures crossing the easement shall be located at least 18” below ground. Walls along Rodeo Wash should incorporate one of the following decorative materials: tile, stone, brick, textured brick/block, a coarse-textured material such as stucco or plaster, wrought iron, or a combination of the above materials.


Please feel free to call me at 791-4873 x 215 if you have any questions.
09/08/2003 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

S03-020 Amherst South II 09/05/03

() Tentative Plat
( ) Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
( ) Revised Plan/Plat
( ) Board of Adjustment
( ) Other

CROSS REFERENCE: C12-85-2, & C9-80-76
NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Kino Area Plan

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A

COMMENTS DUE BY: September 4, 2003

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
(X) See Additional Comments Attached
( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
(X) Resubmittal Required:
(X) Tentative Plat
( ) Development Plan
(X) Landscape Plan
( ) Other

REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: September 2, 2003



Comprehensive Planning Task Force Comments
Amherst South II
S03-020
September 4, 2003


The proposed Amherst South II, is located within Block “A” of the Amherst South, recorded in Book 40, page 12 and subject to rezoning case C9-80-76. Condition number 1.d.2 requires a 100 foot right-of way for the Rodeo Wash and alleys per City Engineer’s Plan #e-63-1. Neither the proposed site setbacks along the Rodeo Wash or the vegetative resource and wildlife habitat report address the requirements of a Wash Ordinance Wash, such as the Rodeo Wash.

The proposed tentative plat is proposed as a residential cluster project (RCP), and therefore must comply with section 3.6.1 of the Land Use Code, specifically those requirements for a density bonus project and the general development criteria of residential cluster project. This includes, but not limited to common areas of certain land sizes with amenities for all ages, a pedestrian path which links on-site amenities, sidewalks and the Rodeo Wash edge as a continuous pedestrian circulation system.

Staff offers the following comments:

Please revise the tentative plat to include all of the rezoning conditions of C9-80-76, in same language and format as approved by Mayor and Council (see attached copy).

2. Please revised tentative plat and landscape plan to include common areas with amenities for all ages as required by the residential cluster project, Land Use Code, section 3.6.1

Please revise the tentative plat and landscape plan to address the Wash Ordinance wash requirements along the full length of the Rodeo Wash boundary.
09/08/2003 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Denied No on-street parking is permitted. The following notes shall be provided on the plan:
1. Approved fire lane signs shall be provided on both sides of the street in accordance with Tucson Fire Code Sec. 503.
2. Plans for posting fire lane shall be submitted, for Fire Department review, prior to applying for paving/grading permits.
09/08/2003 DOROTHY ROBLES COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Approved no objection
09/09/2003 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) An access plan and maintenance schedule for the vegetation in the resource area is required per TCC 29-17.b.1.c. Submit the revised plans.
See Engineering comments regarding the WASH Report.

2) Note the height of any walls proposed for the dumpster enclosure. Revise the plans as necessary to ensure that this
structure does not conflict with the sight visibility requirements of DS 3-05.0. Relocate if necessary.

3) Revise the landscape plan to relocate any shrubs which may exceed 30" in height from sight visibility triangles. LUC 3.7.3.4

4) The plans approved for bank protection (E-97-01) include a public alley adjacent to the public drainage way.
See Engineering comments.
09/11/2003 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Approved Office of the Pima County Assessor
115 N. Church Ave.
Tucson, Arizona 85701

RICK LYONS
ASSESSOR




TO: CDRC Office
Subdivision Review
City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559)

FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor
Pima County Assessor’s Office
Mapping Department

DATE: September 4, 2003


RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat
S03-020 Amherst South II T151406 (140-16)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements.
_______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements.


COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat.
Add dimensions and bearings for the lot lines and the street centerlines.
Add square footage for the lots
Add ties from the perimeter boundary to the lots.
If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391.

NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.






Susan C. King