Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S03-017
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/06/2003 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/07/2003 | JIM TATE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | TO: Craig Gross; CDRC Coordinator DATE: October 7, 2003 SUBJECT: Second Engineering review of the Earlybird Subdivision Tentative Plat. The activity number is S03-017. SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on October 6, 2003. Engineering has reviewed the received items and recommends approval of the Tentative Plat and the Drainage Report. APPROVAL: TP, DR GENERAL COMMENTS 1. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. 2. Please include the Assurance Package with the Final Plat submittal. This package must include the original Third Party Trust, the original Amendment to Trust, a copy of the Trust Agreement, a copy of the Deed, and a Title Report. 3. Include a copy of the CC&Rs with the Final Plat submittal. The specific maintenance notes specified in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.3.2 must be included on the Final Plat or in the CC&Rs. The term "owner" in the maintenance notes is to be replaced with "Homeowners Association". 4. Please provide a copy of the boundary closure calculations with the Final Plat submittal. 5. A Grading Plan and Permit will be required. Proposed grading in excess of 5,000 yards is designated "engineered grading" and a soils engineering report is required with the Grading Plan submittal. IBC Chapter 36, Section 9. The Soils Report must also address the requirements detailed in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.2.6. 6. Proposed fills in excess of two feet above existing grade at any location in the outer one hundred feet of the developing site adjacent to residentially zoned property require the procedure outlined in IBC Chapter 36 Section13.1. This process must be complete prior to Grading Plan approval. James C. Tate, P.E. Civil Engineer |
| 10/07/2003 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Tentative Plat is approved 10/7/03. |
| 10/09/2003 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S03-017 EARLYBIRD SUBDIVISION/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: October 8, 2003 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** jg |
| 10/17/2003 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Dan Castro FOR: Patricia Gehlen Senior Planner Principal Planner PROJECT: Earlybird Subdivision S03-017 Tentative Plat (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL: October 17, 2003 DUE DATE: October 20, 2003 COMMENTS CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is July 10, 2004. 2. Change "Location Plan" to "Location Map". In addition, reference recorded subdivision plats by book and page numbers in the location map. D.S. 2-03.2.1.D.2 3. Per D.S. 3-01.3.3.A.4, since the five (5) foot pedestrian refuge area will not have sidewalk, all driveway must be concrete to allow for pedestrian and disable pedestrian access to each lot. Add a note to the typical lot detail, which shows concrete driveways. D.S. 2-03.2.4.G 4. Provide a fully dimensioned typical lot layout, which shows how interior and perimeter yard setback requirements for lots 1-4 will be met. In addition, indicate graphically and by note concrete driveways on each lot. D.S. 2-03.2.4.M 5. As a general note provide the DSMR case number, date of approval, modifications requested, and conditions imposed. D.S. 2-03.2.4.J 6. All requested revisions must be made to the plat, Landscape and NPPO plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
| 10/17/2003 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this T.P.: 1. The symbol used to denote new traffic (no parking) signs is not IAW SD100 of PC/COT SDPI 1994 Edition. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dkelch1@ci.tucson.az.us |
| 10/17/2003 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is July 10, 2004. 2. Change "Location Plan" to "Location Map". In addition, reference recorded subdivision plats by book and page numbers in the location map. D.S. 2-03.2.1.D.2 3. Per D.S. 3-01.3.3.A.4, since the five (5) foot pedestrian refuge area will not have sidewalk, all driveway must be concrete to allow for pedestrian and disable pedestrian access to each lot. Add a note to the typical lot detail, which shows concrete driveways. D.S. 2-03.2.4.G 4. Provide a fully dimensioned typical lot layout, which shows how interior and perimeter yard setback requirements for lots 1-4 will be met. In addition, indicate graphically and by note concrete driveways on each lot. D.S. 2-03.2.4.M 5. As a general note provide the DSMR case number, date of approval, modifications requested, and conditions imposed. D.S. 2-03.2.4.J 6. All requested revisions must be made to the plat, Landscape and NPPO plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |