Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S03-016
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/19/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/19/2004 | FRODRIG2 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/24/2004 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Michael St.Paul FOR: Patricia Gehlen Planning Technician Principal Planner PROJECT: S03-016 Barrio Escalante Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL: 4th Review February 20, 2004 DUE DATE: February 20, 2004 COMMENTS CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is May 31, 2004. 2. Add "Residential Cluster Project" and/or "RCP" to the title block. 3. Provide the site coverage calculation for (RCP-9) for the subdivision. LUC Sec 3.2.9, & Sec 3.2.3.1.F 4. Provide the mechanical equipment note for a Residential Cluster Project and demonstrate compliance. LUC Sec 3.6.1.4.A.9 5. Provide the lot split and subdivision restriction note for a Residential Cluster Project. LUC Sec 3.6.1.4.A.10 6. Provide three (3) copies of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) that shall meet the Land Use Code requirement prior the approval of Final Plat. DS 2-10.3.2.E & F LUC Sec 3.6.1.5 7. Demonstrate compliance with the front yard setback for both the building and driveway requirements. The front yard building setback is the greater of twenty-one feet (21') or the height of the building's from the travel lane wall facing that property line. The driveway setback is eighteen feet (18') from the property line and nineteen feet (19') from the back of the sidewalk. Both conditions apply for the driveway setback to the carport or garage. You have provided a "Parking / Driveway Detail" without delineating the front property line. LUC Sec 3.2.6.5.B.1 and Sec 3.2.6.5.B.2.a 8. At least three hundred (300) square feet of outdoor space must be provided within each lot with attached dwellings. Please see the LUC for detailed information and demonstrate compliance on the Tentative Plat. LUC Sec 3.6.1.4.D.2.c.1 through 5. |
| 02/24/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S03-016 Barrio Escalante Subdivision 02/24/04 (X) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Groves/South Pantano GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: A.S.A.P SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: (() No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (xxxx) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (xxxx) Resubmittal Required: (xxxx) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan (XXXX) Other (Landscape Plan, Elevations, Color Palette and color renderings) REVIEWER: D.Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 02/20/04 COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE S03-016 Barrio Escalante Subdivision Because this is a Residential Cluster Project (RCP), it must be in conformance with the design policies and criteria of the General Plan, and any of its components, including the Groves Neighborhood Plan, the South Pantano Area Plan and the Design Guidelines Manual. In addition, the allowance of the RCP is based on the purpose to provide greater flexibility and creativity in the design of the clustered residential developments. The General Plan and Design Guidelines Manual requests vegetation, specifically shade trees along sidewalks. Please provide a minimum of one shade tree on every other lot along the sidewalks in the development. Also, provide ground vegetation on each individual lot using new vegetation and existing, mature vegetation that is transplantable. Please show these additions on a landscape plan. The Plans call for innovative site design to include design elements of usable open space and active/passive recreational space and that that pedestrian facilities be accessible to the handicapped.. Please provide a pocket park – usable open space area that will provide passive or active recreational facilities. Section 3.6.1.5.A of the Land Use Code states when a common area is established in an RCP, a homeowner’s association or management organization must be established by the developer to be responsible for the ownership, permanent care, and maintenance of commonly owned areas. An instrument shall be submitted with the RCP for review and approval by the City in such form for recordation by the Pima County Recorder. Please provide this required instrument. When RCP site areas are less than four acres in size, the single-family structures need to be architecturally compatible with single-family structures on adjacent parcels. Please show an elevation of the architectural style(s) in the proposed development, including colors and landscape. Also, please demonstrate how they are compatible with the surrounding single-family structures. Please provide a typical section of any masonry screen walls that will be constructed. Please indicate the type of decorative materials and/or pattern that will be used. Also indicate that the wall will be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. Please provide a statement on the general notes section of your tentative plant that this is an RCP. |