Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S03-016
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/15/2003 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/16/2003 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Tentative Plat is approved 9/16/03. |
| 09/24/2003 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586 Director FAX: (520) 740-6380 November 4, 2003 TO: Steve Corrales, P.E., Steve Corrales Engineering Corporation THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Subhash Raval, P.E., Division Manager Pima County Development Review & Technical Services Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Barrio Escalante, Lots 1-47 Tentative Plat - 2nd Submittal S03-016 The above-referenced project has been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. Be advised, the following has not been received by our office as of date: PCWWM Planning Services will need to inform the Development Review Division in writing that treatment capacity is available, before we can approve this project connecting to Pima County’s public sewer system. Please direct all inquiries about this item to Mr. Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services Manager at 520-740-6625. The following comments assume that treatment capacity will become available for this project in the near future. 2. Although a 6" line may be adequate, good engineering practice is to have a 8" sewer and manhole at the end of the line for this type of project. Show all sewer lines to be an 8" line and show a manhole at the end of the line. 3. On the second segment, the slope is missing. Correct appropriately. 4. We will require a complete set of the revised bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the third (3rd ) submittal. Please include a $39.00 check for the wastewater review fees (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) with the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If other sheets are revised in such a manner that the sewer design is impacted, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6586. Subhash Raval, P.E., Division Manager Pima County Development Review & Technical Services Division (Wastewater) SR/SR/dk Copy: Project |
| 09/24/2003 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: September 24, 2003 TO: Craig Gross; CDRC Coordinator SUBJECT: Barrio Escalante Tentative Plat Engineering Review REVIEWER: Loren Makus ACTIVITY NUMBER: S03-016 SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat, Drainage Report, and Conceptual Grading Plan resubmittal have been reviewed by Development Services Department Engineering Division. The Drainage Report and Grading Plan were reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. We do not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat until the following comments have been addressed. TENTATIVE PLAT COMMENTS: 1. Show areas of detention/retention, including the 100-year ponding limits and water surface elevations. (City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No 2-03.2.4.L.1) 2. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions must include clauses requiring the maintenance of the water harvesting areas and prohibiting any blockage of the lot-to-lot drainage. 3. Provide easements for inspection and maintenance of the drainage facilities on individual lots. Individual lot storage systems within single family residential developments are not acceptable for meeting the detention/retention criteria of the City of Tucson. (D.S. 10-01.1.4) Provide justification for this proposed drainage scheme. 4. Verify the discharge flows into and out of the retention basin and at the northwest corner of the project. Compare to page 5 of the Drainage Report. 5. Provide a detail of the retention basin outlet weir. Include inverts for both the inlet and outlet structures for the retention basin. Revise the inlet structure to be consistent with page B-14 of the drainage report. 6. Provide a geotechnical report addressing building setback from the retention basin. (DS 2-03.2.4.M) DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS: 7. The calculation of the required retention volume appears to be incorrect. The 5-year runoff coefficients and the correct site area must be used. Revise the report to provide the correct storage volume. 8. The basin volume calculation appears to be incorrect. The method used overstates the volume of the basin. Revise the volume calculation to provide a more accurate volume calculation. (One method that would be acceptable would be to use the lengths of the sides at half the depth of the basin.) 9. The detention calculations and descriptions are not clear. Revise the explanations to clearly describe the detention scheme. Note: detention is not required for this project. Submit a revised Tentative Plat and a revised Drainage Report. The next submittal should address all the above items. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan submittal will be required with the grading permit application submittal. To set up a meeting, call me at 791-5550, extension 1161. Loren Makus Senior Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 09/24/2003 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S03-016 BARRIO ESCALANTE SUBDIVISION/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: September 19, 2003 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: LABEL APPROVED STREET NAME ON FINAL PLAT. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |
| 09/27/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | The following comments from the previous review still apply. No revised plans were received, landscape plans are required. 1. The proposed parking area must comply with the provisions of LUC 3.7 Landscape and Screening. 2. A street landscape border along Escalante Road is required. 3. In addition screening per LUC Table 3.7.2-I is required. The parking area must be screened from the street and from adjacent residentially zoned properties within 100 feet. In addition the retention basin now proposed along Escalante Road is required to be landscaped in compliance with LUC 3.7.4.3.A. DS 10-01.0 |
| 09/29/2003 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Michael St.Paul FOR: Patricia Gehlen Planning Technician Principal Planner PROJECT: S03-016 Barrio Escalante Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL: 2nd submittal September 29, 2003 DUE DATE: September 29, 2003 COMMENTS CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is May 31, 2004. 2. There has been no response to the first set of zoning review comments. Please see the previous set of comments. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Michael St.Paul, (520) 791-5608 x1184. |
| 10/02/2003 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this T.P. 1. Include a general note to read "All non-signalized intersection street names must have E-W block number addresses for E-W roadways and N-S block number addresses for N-S roadways." 2nd request 2. Show and label SVT's as to dimension (ie 20x110) on the site plan. 2nd request 3. Show location of no parking signs in the sections and in plan view. 2nd request Use the proper symbol for signage IAW SD100 PC/COT Standard Details for Public Improvements 1994 Edition. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dkelch1@ci.tucson.az.us |