Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S03-007
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/26/2003 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/27/2003 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved 3/27/03. |
| 04/07/2003 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S03-007 BARBEE HANSON SILVERBELL TRAILS |
| 04/18/2003 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval for this T.P. 1. No Parking is allowed in cul-de-sacs. So indicate on plans with appropriate signage. 2. Show dimensions of SVTs at Prichett Dr. and Ramie Way. 3. Show no parking signs in section A/3. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) |
| 04/18/2003 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S03-007 Silverbell Trails, L. 1-42 04/18/03 () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-02-14 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Tucson Mountains Subregional Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Silverbell Rd. is Scenic Route COMMENTS DUE BY: 4/22/03 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: Joanne Hershenhorn 791-4505 DATE: 4/18/03 Silverbell Trails, S03-007 The Preliminary Development Plan that was submitted with the rezoning case for this property indicated that all homes will be single-story. Please include a general note on the Tentative Plat stating that the entire site will consist only of single story homes. To demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition #3, please add a note on sheet 3/3 that states that all structures shall be limited to a maximum height of 24 feet, and sited and landscaped to minimize any negative visual impacts. To demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition #4, please add a note on sheet 3/3 that states that all structures shall be earth-tone colors in context with the surrounding environment. To demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition #6, please provide a typical section for any masonry screen walls that will be provided. The section detail should indicate the type of decorative materials and/or pattern that will be used, and that the wall will be constructed of or painted with graffiti-resistant materials. To demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition #7, please show the locations of all continuous screen walls that will be constructed, and any variations in alignment, and trees/shrubs that will be planted in the voids created by the variations in alignment. |
| 04/21/2003 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is May 25, 2004. 2. Add a statement to the title block, which references this project as a RCP subdivision. D.S. 2-03.2.1.G 3. This project has been assigned subdivision case number S03-007. Please note this number in the lower right corner of each sheet on all plans. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.1 4. The existing zoning of this property is SR and SH. Revise general note one (1) as required. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.2 5. Provide a copy of the Mayor and Council authorized rezoning conditions. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.3 6. Revise the proposed use noted under general note three (3) to the following: "The proposed use is Single Family Detached Residential subject to LUC Section 3.6.1 and 3.5.7.1.E & .F." D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.5 7. Revise general note 19 to the following: "This plat is designed to meet the Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ) and Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback overlay zone criteria. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.7 8. This project is within the Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ). A separate review is required for the SCZ. The case number for the SCZ review must be noted in the lower right corner of each sheet of the tentative plat, landscape and NPPO plans. All required elements of the SCZ (i.e. 30 foot buffer, view corridors, approved colors, etc..) as shown on the approved SCZ plan must be added to the tentative plat, along with date of approval and any conditions placed on that approval. The SCZ requires separate review. A thirty-foot-wide buffer area, adjacent to the future MS & R right-of-way, is to be preserved in place and maintained in its natural state. Maximum height of a structure is one-third the distance of the structure from the future-right-of-way, not to exceed 24 feet in height. Material and/or paint description for areas of structures and signage visible from the Scenic Route are reviewed for colors, which are predominant within the surrounding landscape, such as desert and earthtones. The SCZ process requires that the applicant offer to meet with the adjacent property owners and neighborhood associations. For more specific information on this process, please contact our office. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.7 9. All existing and proposed easements on this site must be shown on the plat, including the type, width, recordation information, and whether they will be private or public. If an easement is to be recorded by final plat, please so state. D.S. 2-03.2.4.J 10. Provide a typical plot plan layout for a corner lot. D.S. 2-10.3.1.B 11. Please add the following note to typical interior lot detail on sheet 3 of 3: "18 feet must be provided in front of the carport or garage and measured so that the full 18 foot parking space is available for parking on-site." D.S. 2-10.3.2.A/ L.U.C. 3.2.6.5.B.2.A 12. The Final Plat may not be approved until the CC&R's are reviewed and approved by the Zoning Review Section. The CC&R's must meet criteria listed in L.U.C. 3.6.1.5. If applicable, the CC&R's must also detail the restrictions on any proposed natural areas. D.S. 2-10.3.2.E/ L.U.C. 3.6.1.5 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
| 04/21/2003 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S03-007 SILVERBELL TRAILS / TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: April 21, 2003 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1: Change “42-65” to “46-98” and “14-29” (eastern most) to “43-26” on Location Map. 2: Change “Ironwood Hills Drive” to “Ironwood Hill Drive” on Location Map. 3: Change “Xochipilli Street” to “Xochipilli Drive” on pg. 2. 4: Change “Chantalli Estates” to “Chantlalli Estates” on pg. 2. 5: Change “Ramie Way” to “Ramie Place” on pg. 2. 6: Change “Prichett Drive” to “Prichett Place or Court” on pg. 2. |
| 04/22/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Add the following notes to the landscape plan or tentative plat: Within the Scenic Route buffer area and the MS&R right-of-way, all areas between the MS&R right-of-way line and the existing street right-of-way that are disturbed by development shall be revegetated with native vegetation. Within the SCZ, excluding the Scenic Routes buffer area, all disturbed areas on the site that are visible from the Scenic Route and are not covered by permanent improvements shall be revegetated with native plants, plants from the Drought Tolerant Plant List, or a combination of both. 2) Disturbance within the thirty-foot wide SCZ buffer is limited to permitted improvements per LUC 3.7.5.2.C. The proposed channel and swale would modify, to some extent, the existing topography and vegetation. Revise the plans as necessary to preserve and maintain the SCZ buffer in a natural state. 3) Revise the plans to demonstrate compliance with the conditions of rezoning. Address #'s 5,6,and 7 specifically on the tentative plat or the landscape plan, locate, describe or identify all required elements. 4) Revise the legend on sheet L-1 to clarify the quantities of salvaged plants proposed. Resubmittal of all revised plans is required. |
| 04/23/2003 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: Silverbell Trails Tentative Plat Engineering Review REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: S03-007 SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat, Landscape Plan, title report, and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on March 26, 2003. Development Services Department Engineering Division has done a review of the received items and does not recommend approval at this time. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS: 1) Land Use Code Section (LUC) 2.8.2.6.C: Full Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ) review will be provided upon the complete SCZ submittal; preliminary comments are provided at this time. This project is within the Scenic Corridor Zone where drainageways are to be maintained in their natural state. Address the following: a) A thirty-foot-wide buffer area, adjacent to the future MS&R right-of-way, is to be preserved in place and maintained in its natural state. A swale from the southeast corner running north along the 30-foot SCZ buffer area is proposed on page 5. Provide discussion on page 5 in Drainage report regarding SCZ compliance of design for Common Area "D" within the 400-foot SCZ area; b) Concentrated flows are proposed at outlet of south swale into 30-foot SCZ buffer area. Revise design and provide discussion on page 5 in Drainage report regarding compliance to SCZ for Common Area at rear of lots 35-42; c) A drainage swale in the proposed Private Drainageway east of lots 5 and 6 is shown to receive flow from the outlet of the proposed 24"CMP pipes and flows from the northerly flowing swale in the 30-foot SCZ buffer area. Revise drainage design such that it meets SCZ requirements. 2) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a: A soils report with infiltration test results will be required to be submitted, demonstrating the drain time for the retained stormwater for any proposed basin meets the maximum disposal time. Discuss results in drainage report. 3) DS Sec.10-02.1.5.1: Show configuration calculations for basin volume. How will basin area be accessed? Scuppers and their associated railing usually preclude the use of the sidewalk above the scuppers for access (vehicular and pedestrian). Show that volume of basin is derived from a basin configuration that includes an access ramp. 4) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.5.C: Label scupper type or provide detail for scuppers. 5) On page 6, state whether 100-year flows are maintained within public right-of-way. 6) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.1: Provide depth of flow, Q100, and velocity for drainage sections on the Onsite Drainage Plan. 7) CMP's are proposed under Ramie Way; RCP is required under public right-of-way. Revise page 7 of the report, appendix calculation sheets, and Cross Section C-C of the Onsite Drainage Plan. 8) Provide assessment and recommendations for inlet and outlet erosion protection for the reinforced concrete drainage structure per rezoning condition 10. 9) Provide invert elevations for existing CMP's. 10) Provide activity number and address on cover of Drainage Report. TENTATIVE PLAT COMMENTS: 11) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.D.2: Identify North Introspect Drive on location map. Check subdivision book and page call-out located southwest of project site labeled "42-65"; is this Ruston Hills Book 46 page 98 as shown on Assessor's Record Map in Title Report? Also correct spelling for reference to Chantlalli Estates on sheet 2. 12) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.J: On the legend: a) Are the symbols: "A.D.T.", "P.Y.S.", "D.A.S.", or "H" used for this plat? b) Add the following symbols: existing fence, "B.S.L.", "S.F.", "W.S.E.", "N.T.L." and "S.V.T." 13) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.A.1: Provide primary owner name for SVBT, LLC to sheet 1. 14) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.A.2: Provide the registration signature on the seal of the land surveyor or professional engineer that prepared the Tentative Plat. 15) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.B.7: Add a general note stating that the plat is designed to meet the special overlay zones criteria for LUC Sec.2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone. 16) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.A: For vertical and horizontal control, address the following: a) Clearly dimension tie with bearings and distances from a subdivision control monument to a permanent survey monument, quarter section, or section corner benchmark; b) Show location of benchmark listed in General Note 13 or label/provide local benchmark; c) Provide datum; 17) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.B: For boundary data, address the following: a) Clarify whether property line data are (M), (R), or (C); b) Verify bearings, delta, and distances, per title report Exhibit "One"; some of the data does not match title report; c) Label existing tagged survey monuments. 18) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.C: All existing easements will be drawn on the plat, and recordation information, locations, widths, and purposes shall be included. If the easement is not in use and proposed for abandonment, so indicate. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Show and label existing overhead electric lines. It appears from a field investigation that there may be existing utilities on site that were not called out on the Tentative Plat. Show location and size of all existing utilities. Delineate and label any and all existing utility easements on site, including those for gas services, TEP pedestals, overhead electric lines, water well, phone pedestal, as well as any existing leach fields and sewer manhole caps. 19) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.F.1: Label invert elevations for existing CMP's. Also label Silver Arrow Drive on plan view sheet 2. 20) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.H: It appears from a field investigation that there is evidence of well and leach fields on site; with one leach field at the location of the proposed basin. Provide notation regarding removal or demolition of all existing structures on site, including that notation for any leach field as well as proper and legal disposal of contaminated soils. Will any water wells need filling / sealing / abandonment? 21) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.F: Clarify the following proposed street information: a) Provide centerline curve data for proposed streets; b) Provide a detail and show on plan view all handicap ramps; c) Proposed 2-24" CMP's are labeled under Ramie Way; RCP is required under Public ROW; d) Delineate and dimension drainage easements for inlet and outlet erosion protection for the reinforced concrete drainage structure per rezoning condition 10; e) Provide section for Silverbell Road showing new sidewalk and curb to and along North Silverbell Road frontage of property. 22) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.I: Provide dimensions and square footage of common areas. 23) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.J: All proposed drainage easements, specifically, for the reinforced concrete drainage structure per rezoning condition 10, are to be dimensioned and labeled as whether they will be public or private. 24) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.K: Add notation for the removal of existing CMP's for the replacement of the reinforced concrete drainage structure per rezoning condition 10. 25) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.1: Provide depth of flow, Q100, & velocity for drainage sections on sheet 3. 26) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.4: Provide proposed grades and ground elevations for reference to future grading and site drainage: a) Provide general proposed grades and spot elevations in streets; b) Provide general proposed spot elevations for lots 16, 17, 30, and show that existing elevations are maintained within 2 feet from property boundary; c) Provide a cross section for west side of lot 31, including pad elevation, interceptor swale, existing and proposed grades; d) Provide minimum slope grades for the Typical Lot Flow Drainage Details on sheet 3; e) On sheet 3, provide thickness and D50 for Section D. 27) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.7: Proposed project is subject to the new AZPDES requirements for NOI and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans. A SWPPP submittal will be required for the grading plan submittal review. Contact Loren Makus, 791-4251 for any questions or submittal requirements. 28) DS Sec.2-03.3.1.E: Show on Tentative Plat any easements described in schedule B of title report. 29) DS Sec.2-03.3.1.J: Provide the following: a) Provide status on the traffic review for the improvements referenced in rezoning condition 9; b) State whether improvements called out in rezoning condition 11 will be constructed under this project or if in-lieu fees are to be submitted. 30) DS Sec.2-03.3.1.K: Submit a copy of the Preliminary Development Plan referenced in rezoning condition 1. Further comments may be forthcoming upon review of this document. 31) DS Sec.3-01.5.1: On planview on sheet 2, show building setback line for Lot 1 to take into account sight visibility triangle. 32) DS Sec.10-01.4.3: Show basin security barriers for proposed basin. If any human activity zone is proposed in this Common Area, 8:1(H:V) side slopes are needed at location of pedestrian access. 33) LUC 2.8.2.6.C: Show revised drainage for SCZ compliance per drainage report comments. 34) A geotechnical report will be required to provide geotechnical engineering information specific to the project site not limited to the discussion of: a) existing soils conditions of the site and the viability of project; b) angle of shear and maximum recommended slope grades and treatments of all proposed cut and fill slopes; c) location and elevation of field density tests; d) summary of field and laboratory tests, including basin infiltration testing; e) recommended compaction treatment of all fills areas; f) erosion susceptibility and recommended treatment for stability, erosion and siltation control of all proposed graded areas and constructed slopes; g) stormwater soil siltation potential for all disturbed areas; h) description of soil constraints for structural design of foundations, footings, and walls, including minimum distance from foundations to drainage swales; i) determination of pavement design section; j) recommendations for any existing water well closure; k) identification of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas including soils conditions at locations of any existing on-site private sewer disposal systems and recommendations for removal of any contaminated soils. LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENT: 35) DS Sec.3-01.5.1.B.1: Provide notation for restriction of existing or proposed vegetation and structures within 30" to 72" in height within the sight visibility triangles. The next submittal should address all the above items. Prior to next submittal, schedule a meeting with me to go over the comments, then submit revised Tentative Plat, soils report, title report, revised Drainage Report, revised Landscape Plans, and $300 for drainage review fees. To set up a meeting, call me at 791-5550, extension 2204. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Section Development Services Department |
| 04/24/2003 | CRAIG GROSS | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | DATE: April 29, 2003 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation RE: CDRC Transmittal, Project S03-007 Silverbell Trails: Tentative Plat Review CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has reviewed the tentative plat for Silverbell Trails and has no comment. |
| 04/24/2003 | CRAIG GROSS | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Case Number: S03-007 Project Name: Silverbell Trails Estimated Traffic Generation: 402 trips If you have any questions or need more information, please contact me. Sandy White Research & Statistical Analyst Pima Association of Governments ph: 520-792-1093 x108 fax: 520-792-9151 |
| 04/24/2003 | CRAIG GROSS | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586 Director FAX: (520) 740-6380 May 05, 2003 TO: Steve Magelli, OPW Engineering, LLC THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division SUBJECT: Silverbell Trails, Lots 1-42 and Commond Areas A-D Tentative Plat - 1st Submittal S03-007 We have reviewed the above-referenced project on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. Per Pima County Wastewater Management’s Planning Services, there is currently capacity in the existing downstream sewerage system for this development. This response is not to be construed as a commitment for conveyance capacity allocation, but rather an analysis of the existing sewerage system as of this date. 2. Sheet 2: The slopes of the proposed 8" on-site sewer lines does not conform to the standards given within PCWWM’s Manual of Engineering Standards and Practices and therefore, Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A. Revise as necessary. 3. Sheet 2: Show and label existing Manhole #7 in sewer line G-97-043 in Silver Arrow Drive. 4. Sheet 2: Label existing Manhole #5 in sewer line G-98-066. 5. Sheet 2: Approximately 800' of 10" offsite sewer line is being proposed, that passes by the two existing manholes referenced above, to connect the public sewer system at existing Manhole #5 in G-73-62. Show the rim and invert elevations of the existing Manhole #7 in sewer line G-97-043 in Silver Arrow Drive, and existing Manhole #5 in sewer line G-98-066, and provide other information as necessary to demonstrate the need to connect to the public sewer system at existing Manhole #5 in G-73-62. Glen Hitz’s March 2002 capacity response letter indicates that capacity is available in sewer line G-97-043. 6. Sheet 1: If an off-site sewer line must be constructed, add a General Note that states: THE REQUIRED OFF-SITE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER WILL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARDS. 7. If a qualifying off-site sewer line must be constructed to sewer this proposed subdivision, a portion of this subdivision may qualify for the Participating sewer connection fee rate, but such a determination cannot be made until this office has agreed that a qualifying off-site public sewer line must be constructed, and the amount of necessary qualifying off-site sewer line has been agreed upon. 8. We will require a complete set of the revised bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Ordinance 2003-29 went into effect on April 11, 2003. This ordinance requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of a development plan or subdivision plat. The review fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2) submittal, and a minimum of two (2) sheets (Sheets 1 & 2) will need to be reviewed. Therefore, a check for $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If other sheets are revised in such a manner that the sewer design is impacted, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6563. Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division TR/tr Copy: Project |
| 04/24/2003 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: April 22, 2003 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S03-007 Silverbell Trails T131333 (103-18) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat. Add the bearings for the lot lines and the dimensions and bearings for the street centerlines. Add the complete curve data with central angles. If Chantalli Estates has been recorded, please add the book and page; if it has not been recorded by the time your final plat is ready, please put UNSUBDIVIDED in its place. If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan C. King |
| 04/29/2003 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | 3950 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 Telephone: 520-884-3879 Fax: 520-770-2002 WR#104608 May 12, 2003 Ms. Barbee Hanson OPW & Associates, Inc. 7000 E. Tanque Verde Road, #37 Tucson, Arizona 85715 Dear Ms. Hanson: SUBJECT: Silverbell Trails Lots 1-42 S03-007 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the Tentative Plat stamped March 20, 2003. This Company is unable to approve the Plat at this time. The following are requirements prior to this Company's approval of the Tentative Plat: ¨ There is an overhead electrical line located within the southerly 16 feet of this project that requires easement recordation depiction on a revised Tentative Plat. The Plat also shows that a landscape area is planned to be dedicated within this easement area, and TEP requires review and approval of the Landscape Plans prior to approval of this Plat. This would include any type of wall/fence that is proposed in the area. ¨ For your information, the existing overhead 46KV line, along the west side of Silverbell Road, will be in conflict with the City of Tucson's request to widen said road, and the cost for relocation of any of these facilities shall be borne by the developer. ¨ There is an overhead line existing by easement servicing a residence on the site. It appears that these facilities will not be required, and will be removed at the Company's cost. A TEP facilities map, with the approximate location of the existing facilities, is enclosed. TEP will provide an electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. At the customer's request, and upon receipt of complete building and site plans, a design can be provided prior to the Approved Tentative Plat, however, once a design is provided, any design changes will be billable to the developer. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (520) 884-3879. Sincerely, S. Glynda Rothwell Right-of-Way Agent Land Management sgr cc: C. Gross, City of Tucson Terramar Properties |
| 04/29/2003 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: April 29, 2003 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation RE: CDRC Transmittal, Project S03-007 Silverbell Trails: Tentative Plat Review CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has reviewed the tentative plat for Silverbell Trails and has no comment. |