Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S02-048
Review Name: CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/07/2003 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586 Director FAX: (520) 740-6380 January 15, 2003 TO: Debbie S. Shinstine, P.E., THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division SUBJECT: Navajo Place Apartments, Lots 1-4 Tentative Plat - 1st Submittal S02-048 We have reviewed the above-referenced project on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. There is currently capacity in the existing downstream sewerage system for this development. This response is not to be construed as a commitment for conveyance capacity allocation, but rather an analysis of the existing sewerage system as of this date. 2. Based on the preliminary sewer layout as shown on the referenced tentative plat, this project would qualify for Participating sewer connection fee rates. 3. Add the subdivision plat case number, S02-048, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than the cross reference numbers. 4. Delete General Note 14. 5. Make second sentence of General Note 13 into a separate General Note. 6. Show the 6" private sewer lines connecting to the 8" existing public sewer line only at new or existing manholes in the public sewer lines. No direct taps are allowed when the sewer pipes are these sizes. Note: To minimize the cost of this project, you may wish to redesign the configuration of the private sewer lines so that only one connection point to the public sewer system is necessary. 7. Show how the existing duplex on Lot #1 (345 East Navajo) is connected to the public sewer system. Please see the attached sewer connection card. Note: This information should be field verified. 8. PCWWM’s records for the adjacent property to the northwest (341 East Navajo) indicate that the private sewer lines serving this property cross the property being subdivided. Please see the attached sewer connection card. Please take all of the following actions: a) Field verify the information shown on the sewer connection card. b) Show all existing private sewer lines that serve 341 East Navajo and cross the property being subdivided, and how these private sewer lines connect to the public sewer system c) Show any existing private sewer easements, and any new private sewer easements necessary to maintain these private sewer lines. 9. The Navajo Place, Lots 1-9 and Common Area A plat recorded at Book 41, M & P, Page 21 indicates that a homeowner’s association was formed to maintain the private sewer lines serving that subdivision. Will the homeowner’s association for the re-sub have any obligation to the original homeowner’s association to maintain private sewer lines? If so, please explain, and provide copies of any existing sewer agreements that may affect this project. 10. We will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6563. Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division TR/tr Attach: Sewer connection cards for 341 and 345 East Navajo Road Copy w attach: Project |
| 11/14/2002 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | INITIALIZE THE WORKFLOW | Completed | |
| 11/18/2002 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | 1. ADD A GENERAL NOTE STATING:"ADDITIONAL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE DEVELOPER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TUCSON FIRE CODE". 2. REMOVE FIRE HYDRANT INDICATED ON PLAN. LOCATION IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. |
| 11/19/2002 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S02-048 DEBBIE SHINSTINE NAVAJO PLACE APARTMENTS |
| 11/19/2002 | JIM TATE | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | ENGINEERING | Denied | TO: Craig Gross; CDRC Coordinator DATE: November 19, 2002 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Navajo Place Apartments Tentative Plat. The activity number is S02-048. SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat, Drainage Report, and Landscape Plan were received by Engineering on November 15, 2002. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat, Drainage Report, or the Landscape Plan. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: TP, DR, LP GENERAL COMMENTS 1. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. 2. Please include the Assurance Package with the Final Plat submittal. 3. The maintenance notes specified in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.3.2 must be included on the Final Plat. The Final Plat must specify that this maintenance is the responsibility of the owner of Lot 4. 4. Please provide a copy of the boundary closure calculations with the Final Plat submittal. 5. A Grading Plan and Permit will be required. Proposed grading in excess of 5,000 yards is designated "engineered grading" and a soils engineering report is required with the Grading Plan submittal. IBC Chapter 36, Section 9. The Soils Report must also address the requirements detailed in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.2.6. 6. Proposed fills in excess of two feet above existing grade at any location in the outer one hundred feet of the developing site adjacent to residentially zoned property require the procedure outlined in IBC Chapter 36 Section13.1. This process must be complete prior to Grading Plan approval. 7. A Flood Use Permit is required prior to Grading Plan approval. The next submittal must address the following items: TENTATIVE PLAT 1. Include "Tentative Plat" in the title block. 2. The Legend must show and describe all symbols used on the drawing. Many of the lines and symbols on the plan are not identified. DS 2-03.2.1.J 3. Place the subdivision case number (S02-048) in the lower right corner of the plat next to the title block. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 4. General note 2 specifies the number of lots as 3. This should be 4. 5. General note 8 must read, "A Floodplain Use Permit and finished floor elevation certificates are required for Lots 1-4". DS 2-03.2.2.C2.b 6. Show benchmark locations, the proposed location of and method of tie to permanent survey monuments or the nearest section or quarter section corner., and the proposed location and type of subdivision control monuments. All monuments found or set must be described. At least one corner of the subdivision will be tied by course and distance to a section corner, a quarter section corner, or an established City or County survey monument. DS 2-03.2.3.A & DS 2-03.6.5.A 7. Remove the term "future" from the specified right of way width designation on the plan. Navajo is not an MS&R route. 8. Show dimensioned width of paving. DS 2-03.2.3.D. 9. Indicate ground elevation on the site based on City of Tucson Datum (indicate City of Tucson field book number and page). Specify the vertical datum for all elevations on the plan. DS 2-03.2.3.F 10. Show 100-yr. peak WSEL on the plan (cross-sections 32.1 and 32.2). DS 2-03.2.3.J 11. Label the private street "private street". DS 2-03.2.4.F Indicate the proposed street name if available. 12. Solid waste vehicle can not back up into the street, whether public or private. Relocate the dumpster. 13. Indicate proposed drainage solutions, such as origin, direction, and destination of flow and method of collecting and containing flow. Show roof drainage. DS 2-03.2.4.L.2 14. Indicate locations and types of drainage structures, drainage crossings, pipe culverts, etc. DS 2-03.2.4.L.3 Sidewalks must be flood free for all storm discharges of up to a ten year flood event. Drainage from the apartment building areas must not cross sidewalks. DS 2-08.4.1.E 15. Show locations and 100-yr. peak flows of off-site runoff acceptance points and on-site discharge points. DS 2-03.2.4.L.7 16. The basin must have a maintenance access ramp. Show on the plan. Maximum slope is 15%. Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.2.4 17. The near side sight visibility triangle should be 180 ft. The plan shows 265 ft. DS 3-01.5.3 18. The pedestrian circulation system must connect lots 1, 2, and 3 with lot 4. Tucson Land Use Code, 3.6.1.4.G 19. Sidewalk must be provided between the west parking area on Lot 4 and the building. DS 2-08.4.1.B 20. All new subdivisions shall provide four foot wide sidewalks along the entire length of street frontage, whether public or private, of the property in question. Provide sidewalks on both sides of the new private street. DS 3-01.3.3.A & DS 2-03.2.7 21. Show a street section of the new private street. Include the sidewalk area on the section. DS 2-03.2.4.F 22. Show the basin 100-yr. peak ponding limits and WSEL. DRAINAGE REPORT 1. Page 3 Site Location and Project Description should read, "... hydraulic analysis for Lots 1-4 proposed Navajo Place Subdivision". 2. Page 3 specifies the project area as 1.2 acres. The actual area (as specified on the plat and as actually measured) is 1.34 acres. The hydrologic data sheets and the retention calculations also incorrectly use 1.2 acres. Please revise the report to reflect the true area of 1.34 acres. 3. Please specify on Page 4 under Long - Term Maintenance Responsibility that the required maintenance of the retention basin will be performed by the owner of Lot 4. 4. On page 6 specify the vertical datum used for all elevations specified in the report. 5. Show vertical datum conversion calculations as appropriate (the finished floor elevations in the drainage report do not match those on the Tentative Plat) . 6. It appears that Table 2 page 6 has the existing and proposed data switched. 7. The Drainage Report must discuss the proposed on-site drainage plan. It does not appear that all lots will drain to the basin. Identify the different on-site watersheds. Quantify and locate discharge. The basin watershed must be of sufficient size to meet the retention requirement. SMDDFM, 2.3.1.5.A & SMDDFM 2.3.1.3.B 8. Size all drainage structures. Sidewalks must be flood free for up to the 10-yr. event. SMDDFM, 2.3.1.5.C 9. Describe the size, location, and hydrologic characteristics of upstream and adjoining watersheds which will affect the site. Provide Hydrologic Data Sheets for each point of off-site drainage flow entering the property. SMDDFM, 2.3.1.3 10. Determine the basin 100-yr. peak ponding limits and WSEL. What is the mechanism for basin overflow? SMDDFM, 2.3.1.6.A.e 11. A soils report is required in conjunction with the design of each surface storage facility which utilizes infiltration as a method of basin drainage. The report shall, as a minimum, address soil classification, soil erodibility, soil permeability, slope stability, and ground-water elevations. Provide associated calculations, based on the percolation tests, showing that the basin will drain in less than 12 hours. 12. Provide a detailed Basin Maintenance Checklist and Schedule. SMDDFM, 2.3.1.6.C LANDSCAPE PLAN 1. The Landscape buffer is not allowed in the right of way. 2. Sight visibility triangles on the Landscape Plan must match those on the Tentative Plat. See comment 17 above. James C. Tate, P.E. Civil Engineer |
| 11/20/2002 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: November 19, 2002 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Senior Planner, Parks and Recreation RE: CDRC Transmittal, Project S02-048 Navajo Place Apts CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has reviewed and approved. |
| 11/27/2002 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S02-048 Navajo Place Apartments 11/25/02 ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: CDRC: C12-83-51 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Cragin-Keeling Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: December 11, 2002 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 11-25-02 Comprehensive Planning Task Force Comments Navajo Place Apartments, S02-048 Since this is an RCP, it must be in conformance with the design policies and criteria of the Cragin-Keeling Area Plan, the General Plan, and any of their components. The Design Guidelines Manual, which offers insight and clarification into land use and community design policies, is also used as an additional resource. It should be noted that this project is a re-plat of the existing approved Navajo Place, Lots 1 thru 9 and Common Area A, C12-83-5, developed under the planned unit development criteria. It is re-platted to comply with the current residential cluster project (RCP) criteria and Plan policy. The proposed project on its prior plat (C12-83-51) indicated two common areas. However, the current re-platting of this subdivision does not provide for any common areas or recreational facilities. The Plans call for usable common space, passive or active, with possible detention/retention basins designed as common open areas. Please provide for usable common area / open space for this project on the tentative plat. The proposed project presents possible buffering and screening concerns for the existing multiple-family units to the north and west of Lots 3 & 4. Please demonstrate on the tentative plat how the parking areas will be screened to mitigate any potential negative impacts, such as noise, odor, and lighting. Plan policy delineates that refuse containers should be located away from adjacent residential areas; screened with masonry walls and landscaping to mitigate any visual impacts. Please provide a detail of the dumpster enclosure so as to demonstrate compliance with Plan policy. The Plans call for the screening of electrical, mechanical, and other free-standing equipment using masonry wall and /or landscaping with drought tolerant vegetation. Please provide a detail showing the screening of electrical, mechanical, and other free-standing equipment for this project. The Plans call for the softening of the visual impact of masonry walls. Please provide a detail which shows, and/or, a note which reads “All walls are to be graffiti-resistant and incorporate one or more visually appealing design treatments, such as; the use of two or more decorative materials like stucco, tile, stone, or brick; a visually interesting design on the wall surface; varied wall alignments (jog, curve, notch, setback, etc.); and/or, trees and shrubbery in voids created by wall variations.” The tentative plat does not appear to adequately address or show how the existing duplex on Lot 1 is to be integrated with the proposed multiple-family units, including but not limited to parking, pedestrian paths, and common areas. Please demonstrate on the tentative plat integration of the existing duplex on Lot 1 with the proposed multiple-family project. The Plans call for new developments to incorporate “Safe By Design” concepts in order to enhance public safety and reduce the incidences of crime, including that multi-family projects be designed to extend the area of responsibility of residents beyond entryways of individual units. Please indicate in the tentative plat the incorporation of “Safe By Design” concepts for this project, to include but not limited to the following: - Utilize screening which allows visibility and the surveillance of the project and/or which creates an effective barrier around the property. - Plant materials, when used in areas adjacent to doors and windows, should be of such a height (e.g. less than 30 inches or with a greater than six foot space between the ground and the canopy) to retain visibility of building openings from the street or from other properties. When possible, thorny or spiny plant species should be utilized. - Provide lighting at doorways and windows. - Locate children’s and other outdoor recreation areas so that they are visible from a maximum number of units. The Plans provide for guidelines that help to promote compatibility of new development with existing land uses. The tentative plat does not appear to provide or show how it will mitigate the potential negative impacts of more intense development on the established neighborhood in regards to lighting and pole height. Please provide a note in the General Notes section to read, “ All lights to be low sodium, no higher than 18 feet, and directed downward and shielded away from residential parcels and public roadways.” The Plans provide for guidelines that help to promote compatibility of new development with existing land uses. The proposed project did not provide elevations or footprints of proposed multi-family units. Please provide elevations and footprints of proposed multi-family units in order to show that the side and rear of buildings are commensurate with appearance to the front façade and compatibility with existing neighborhood. Please provide a note to the General Notes section to read, ”Water harvesting techniques to be incorporated in the landscaping.” |
| 12/02/2002 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Case Number: S02-048 Project Name: Navajo Place Apartments Estimated Traffic Generation: 186 trips If you have any questions or need more information, please contact me. Sandy White Research & Statistical Analyst Pima Association of Governments ph: 520-792-1093 x108 fax: 520-792-9151 swhite@pagnet.org |
| 12/02/2002 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this tentative plat. Note...The near side SVT's are only required to be 185x20. Navajo is classified as a local street by MSRP not a collector. 265x20 is acceptable as it is conservative. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dkelch1@ci.tucson.az.us |
| 12/05/2002 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 3950 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702` Telephone: 520-884-3879 Fax: 520-770-2002 WR#97500 December 4, 2002 Ms. Debbie Shinstine 8220 S. Wentworth Road Tucson, Arizona 85747 Dear Ms. Shinstine: SUBJECT: Navajo Place Apartments S02-048 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the Tentative Plat/ Development Plan, dated November 8, 2002. It appears that the existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development were shown correctly. In the event conflicts do arrise due to this development, the cost for relocation shall be borne by the developer. The locations of the pole and the electrical pedestal do not show on the plan, but it must be in the record that these facilities will require some sort of protection, such as bumper posts around the pedestal, if necessary. Please submit a final set of plans, including electrical load plans, to determine how TEP will serve this commercial development. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Jim Marchbanks Distribution Services – WI-102 Tucson Electric Power Company P. O. Box 711 Tucson, AZ 85702 Please call me at (520) 884-3879, should you have any questions. Sincerely, S. Glynda Rothwell Right-of-Way Agent Land Management sgr cc: C. Gross, City of Tucson |
| 12/12/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | LANDSCAPE | Denied | 1) The landscape plan must be revised to accuartely identify the existing mesquite trees on the site. based on the photos submitted the trees are the protected species "prosopis velutina". The application for exception will not be approved until comments 1 & 2 have been addressed. 2) The existing protected trees on site must be protected for the duration of construction per LUC 3.8.6.7.D. 3) Dimension the 10' street landscape border. LUC 3.7.2.4. 4) Interior landscape borders are required along all property lines, based on LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Revise general note 21 on sheet 1. of the tentative plat. 5) Proposed screening for vehicular use areas within 100 feet of Navajo Road is insufficient. Vegetative screens must provide a continuous, opaque visual barrier a minimum of five feet high. [LUC 3.7.3] Revise the plans to provide the required screening. 6] Screening elements in excess of 30" must be located outside of sight visibility triangles. LUC 3.7.3.4 7) Provide calculation for 50% coverage of the street landscape border. Plants used for screening purposes are not included in the coverage calculation. DS 2-07.2.0 8) Specify a minimum 6' wall height for the dumpster enclosure on the landscape plan. LUC Table 3.7.2-I 9) Revise the plans provide the minimum tree planting area per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c. The minimum width is four feet. Resubmittal of the Tentative Plat/Development Plan and Landscape Plan is required. |
| 12/12/2002 | DAN CASTRO | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | ZONING | Denied | COMMENTS CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is November 12, 2003. 2. In the location map, please reference all recorded subdivision plats by book and page numbers. D.S. 2-03.2.1.D.2 3. Add a statement to the title block, which indicates that the subdivision is a Residential Cluster Project (RCP). D.S. 2-03.2.1.G.2 4. This project has been assigned subdivision case number S02-048. Please note the subdivision case number in the lower right corner of each sheet on all plans. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.1 5. Revise general note number two (2) to state the correct number of lots. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.4 6. Add a statement to general note three (3) that this RCP-7 development is subject to L.U.C. Sec. 3.6.1 and 3.5.7.1.F. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.5 7. a) Cross vehicle parking and vehicle/pedestrian access agreement for all lots is required for this project. Provide a copy of the cross access and parking agreement for review prior to recording the agreement. b) Provide the vehicle and bicycle parking calculation for each individual lot and the overall site including the existing duplex on lot 1. c) Indicate the location of the handicap parking sign required in front of each handicap parking space. In addition, provide the sign detail on the plat which meets the language requirements of the City of Tucson (T.C.C. 20-222). The sign shall be permanently mounted on a stationary post or object with the bottom of the sign located 3 feet to 5 feet above the grade, and shall be visible directly in front of the parking space. L.U.C. 3.6.1.4.F/ L.U.C. 3.3.4 8. a) Connect the pedestrian sidewalk between lots 2 and 4. In addition, the existing duplex must be connected to the on-site pedestrian circulation system. b) Per D.S. 3-05.2.2.B.1, a minimum setback distance of five (5) feet for a pedestrian refuge area must be maintained between the units on lot2 and the PAAL. D.S. 2-03.2.4.M 9. Label the zoning classification for the adjacent property north of lot 3. D.S. 2-03.2.4.D 10. Demonstrate compliance with L.U.C. Sec. 3.6.1.4.A.3. D.S. 2-10.3.2.C 11. a) Barrier-free accessibility must be provided to 25% of the ground floor units, including parking areas. Provide a general note listing which units are proposed to be barrier-free. b) Add a detail showing how barrier-free accessibility will be provided. L.U.C. 3.6.1.4.A.5/ D.S. 2-10.3.1.D 12. a) Add the following general note: All mechanical equipment shall be screened from adjacent streets exterior to the project and from adjacent existing residential development. Screening shall be architecturally integrated with the overall design of the RCP. b) Provide a screening detail for the mechanical equipment. L.U.C. 3.6.1.4.A.9 13. Add the following general note: "There shall be no further division of land or resubdivision without the developer or successor in interest furnishing written notice to all property owners of record within the boundaries of the RCP. In no event shall further division of land occur without the written approval of the Mayor and Council." L.U.C. 3.6.1.4.A.10 14. a) Under the site coverage calculation please include the square footage of the total building area and vehicular use area for the entire site. b) Provide the density and lot coverage calculation of each lot. D.S. 2-10.3.1.C 15. All requested revisions must be made to the tentative plat, Landscape and NPPO plans. D.S. 2-07.2.1.A |
| 12/13/2002 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | NO OBJECTION |
| 12/16/2002 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 RICK LYONS ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: December 6, 2002 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S02-048 Navajo Apartments T131325 (106-04) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat. Your general note #2 shows the number of lots as 3 when it should be 4. Add the section tie to the center ¼ corner or which ever corner is easiest to tie to. The lot lines must be solid lines. Add the road information for Navajo Road. Show the adjacent subdivisions with the map and plat. If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan C. King |
| 12/16/2002 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | Comments + Attachment in file-dated 11/25/02 |