Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Number: S02-043
Parcel: Unknown

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - FINAL PLAT REVIEW

Plan Number - S02-043
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - FINAL PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/16/2003 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
04/18/2003 LAITH ALSHAMI ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied SUBJECT: Mesquite Cove
S02-043, T14S, R15E, SECTION 35

RECEIVED: Final Plat on April 16, 2003

The subject Final Plat has been reviewed. The Final Plat shall be recommended for approval pertaining to Engineering and Floodplain once the following comments have been satisfied.

1. All proposed easements to be dedicated by the plat should be labeled as such.
2. Where applicable, show the limits of the 100-year floodprone area in a surveyable and readily retraceable manner with frequent ties to intersecting lot lines for all flows of one hundred (100) cfs or more (D.S. 2-03.6.4.F.). This requirement includes all 100-year floodplains within the development, including contained floodplains.
3. In order to expedite the plat review and approval, provide the boundary survey and closure calculations report in accordance with D.S. 2-03.6.5.C.3.
4. Article X (Maintenance) of the CC & R's refers to "detention & retention, which are not proposed for this project. Remove the reference to the detention/retention and include instead the proposed channels, flumes and other drainage structures.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 or lalsham1@ci.tucson.az.us


SUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Final Plat and CC & R's
04/18/2003 LAITH ALSHAMI ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied SUBJECT: Mesquite Cove
S02-043, T14S, R15E, SECTION 35

RECEIVED: Final Plat on April 16, 2003

The subject Final Plat has been reviewed. The Final Plat shall be recommended for approval pertaining to Engineering and Floodplain once the following comments have been satisfied.

1. All proposed easements to be dedicated by the plat should be labeled as such.
2. Where applicable, show the limits of the 100-year floodprone area in a surveyable and readily retraceable manner with frequent ties to intersecting lot lines for all flows of one hundred (100) cfs or more (D.S. 2-03.6.4.F.). This requirement includes all 100-year floodplains within the development, including contained floodplains.
3. In order to expedite the plat review and approval, provide the boundary survey and closure calculations report in accordance with D.S. 2-03.6.5.C.3.
4. Article X (Maintenance) of the CC & R's refers to "detention & retention, which are not proposed for this project. Remove the reference to the detention/retention and include instead the proposed channels, flumes and other drainage structures.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 or lalsham1@ci.tucson.az.us


SUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Final Plat and CC & R's
04/29/2003 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office
FROM: David Rivera
Senior Planner

FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner

PROJECT: S02-043
Mesquite Cove, Lots 1-71, Common Area "A"
Final Plat

TRANSMITTAL: April 29, 2003

DUE DATE: April 29, 2003


COMMENTS:

1. An applicant has one (1) year from the date of approval of tentative plat to obtain approval of a final plat that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application. As of this final plat review date the tentative plat has not been approved and a final plat approval date is based on the approval date of the tentative plat. This final plat must be approved and recorded on or before one year of the approval date of the tentative plat. The final plat approval date will be provided as soon as the CDRC manager has provided a tentative plat approval memo.

2. Previous Comment: As indicated in comment seven of the tentative plat review, Label each common area individually with a separate letter designation, i.e. Private Street "A", Landscape Area "B", Drainageway "C" etc. Enclose with a solid line each common area, private street, etc., that will have separate restrictions, a separate homeowners' association, or any common area that is separated by a public right-of-way. All common areas must be listed in the title block.) DS 2-03.6.1.H.1 and DS 2-03.6.4.C

3. The number of lots proposed for this subdivision is now 73, which includes the proposed commercial lot. Revise the title accordingly. (Previous Comment: As a follow up to previous comment 6, the total number lots must be revised accordingly on the tentative plat and the final plat. If lots 70 and 71 are renamed to blocks and or common areas, please revise the title block to indicate the correct number of lots, the block names and common areas.) DS 2-03.6.2.B

4. I have left this comment as reference until we receive notification of the change of concept approval. (Previous Comment: Add the following general note, "This plat is subject to the conditions of rezoning case number C9-97-08, unless superseded by a subsequent rezoning ordinance."
DS 2-03.6.2.D

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608.

DGR C:\planning\cdrc\finalplat\S02043fp2.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: revised final plat
04/30/2003 CRAIG GROSS PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Approv-Cond PIMA COUNTY
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor
Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207

CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586
Director FAX: (520) 740-6380
June 03, 2003

TO: Mike Shipione, Full Circle Engineering

THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services

FROM: Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater)
Pima County Development Review Division

SUBJECT: Mesquite Cove, Lots 1-73 and Common Areas A-C
Final Plat - 2nd Submittal
S02-043



We have reviewed the above-referenced project on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use:

1. All Sheets: Revise the name of this project in the title block of each sheet to reflect the proper number of lot numbers. You’ve shown 73 lots, but the name of the project only indicates 72 of them.

2. Sheet 4: Show the 15' private sewer easement on Lots 12 & 27, and the 20' public sewer easement per DKT 11806, Page 64 using dashed lines. Only property lines should be depicted with solid lines on final plats.

3. We have no record any Private Sewer Service Agreement having been prepared under the development plan for this project (D01-043) as stated in Full Circle’s April 11, 2003 response letter. Either provide a copy of the Private Sewer Service Agreement prepared for that project for our records, or have the owner of record sign the revised Private Sewer Service Agreements described below.

4. We have sent to your office under separate cover a revised Private Sewer Service Agreement reflecting a Participating sewer connection rate for the revised number of lots. The Sewer Service Agreements must be signed by the owner of record, notarized, and all three originals returned to this office before we can approve the final plat.

5. Please submit a blueline with the above revisions to the Subdivision Coordinator for our records. No wastewater review fees will apply to this submittal.

6. We will approve the final plat when we have received the revised bluelines, and the Sewer Service Agreement is has been adequately addressed. Please hand-deliver the revised bluelines and the Sewer Service Agreement(s) directly to me, so that I can expedite the approval of this project. Do not just drop off these documents at our front counter, as this will cause them to be put in our queue of plans to review and delay the approval process.

If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6563.




Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater)
Pima County Development Review Division


TR/tr

Copy: Project
04/30/2003 GLYNDA ROTHWELL UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Denied 3950 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714
Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702


Telephone: 520-884-3879
Fax: 520-770-2002
WR#96012 May 16, 2003



Mr. Michael Shipione
Full Circle Engineering
1222 N. Euclid Avenue
Tucson, Arizona 85719

Dear Mr. Shipione:

SUBJECT: Mesquite Cove
Lots 1-72
S02-043

Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the Final Plat dated April 14, 2003. TEP is unable to approve the Plat at this time.

In order for this Company to approve the Final Plat, the following will be required.
An easement to Tucson Electric Power Company, recorded in Book 11978 at page 883, must be referenced by recordation information, and also must be shown in the areas that are within the boundaries of this project. There is an above-grade electrical facility within Lot 72, and an above-grade facility within the southeast area of Common Area B that will require depiction.
The public utility strip easements, in addition to the 4’x15’ areas, will meet this Company’s easement requirements for the transformers and pedestals.

Please depict the requested easement on a resubmittal of the Final Plat and forward it to the City, where it will be resubmitted to this Company for approval. Enclosed is this Company’s preliminary design which is being forwarded to Southwest Gas, Qwest and Cox Cable. Please contact me at (520) 884-3879 if you have any questions.

Sincerely,



S. Glynda Rothwell
Right-of-Way Agent
Land Management

sgr
cc: Craig Gross, City of Tucson
04/30/2003 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: S02-043 MESQUITE COVE/REVISED FINAL PLAT
DATE: April 30, 2003



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:

1.) Delete block numbers on Location Map.

2.) Change "Lots 1-72" to "Lots 1-73" on all pages.

3.) Sheet division does not match what is actually on sheet 2. Please correct.

4.) Label "Placita Pinole" on pg. 2.