Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S02-043
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/16/2003 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/18/2003 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | SUBJECT: Mesquite Cove S02-043, T14S, R15E, SECTION 35 RECEIVED: Tentative Plat on April 16, 2003 The subject project has been reviewed. The Tentative Plat is acceptable and recommended for approval pertaining to Engineering and Floodplain. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 or lalsham1@ci.tucson.az.us |
| 04/24/2003 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586 Director FAX: (520) 740-6380 June 02, 2003 TO: Mike Shipione, Full Circle Engineering THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division SUBJECT: Mesquite Cove, Lots 1-73 and Common Areas A-C Tentative Plat - 2nd Submittal S02-043 We have reviewed the above-referenced project on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. Please be advised that item 2 of my December 11, 2002 review letter is incorrect. Per our files for the Mesquite Cove Mobile Home Park development plan (D01-043), this project would qualify for Participating sewer connection rates. 2. The tentative plat is hereby approved, subject to: 3. All Sheets: Revise the name of this project in the title block of each sheet to reflect the proper number of lot numbers. You’ve shown 73 lots, but the name of the project only indicates 72 of them. 4. Sheet 1: Delete General Notes 22 and 23. 5. Sheet 1: Revise General Note 40 to read: ON-SITE SEWERS ARE EXISTING AND WILL BE OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. 6. Sheet 4: Show the 15' private sewer easement on Lots 12 & 27 using dashed lines. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6563. Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division TR/tr Copy: Project |
| 04/24/2003 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S02-043 MESQUITE COVE/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: April 23, 2003 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete block numbers on Location Map . Change “Lots 1-72” to Lots 1-73 on all pages. Sheet divisions do not match what are actually on sheets. Please correct. Add “Mesquite Drive” to “Honey” on pg. 4. Include a north arrow and scale on pgs. 4-6. |
| 04/29/2003 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: S02-043 Mesquite Cove, Lots 1 - 71 and Common Area "A" ,B", and "C" Tentative Plat - Residential Cluster Project TRANSMITTAL: April 28, 2003 DUE DATE: April 29, 2003 COMMENTS: 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is October 17, 2003. 2. Per a conversation with Craig Gross regarding the effectuation of zoning from SR to MH-1 the zoning has not been effectuated until a building permit is issued. Craig has said that issuance of a grading permit would be allowed upon completion and approval of the tentative plat and the permit would effectuate the zoning from SR to MH-1. The SR to C-1 zoning will not be effectuated therefore the zoning classification shown on the tentative plat as C-1 must be revised to SR. A general note on the plan may be added to indicate that lot 73 is to be rezoned from SR to C-1 under separate development plan. In addition, the note should state that an extension for that lot 73 has been requested and has been granted. (Previous Comment: I reviewed this plan for zoning compliance as a manufactured home park earlier in the year. Did this development plan, after approval by CDRC, go before Mayor and Council for adoption of the rezoning ordinance? If so clarify how the rezoning was effectuated. If Mayor and Council adopted the rezoning ordinance and the rezoning has been effectuated please revise general note 4 to indicate that the existing zoning is MH-1 and C-1. Define clearly the rezoned areas with the zoning classification. Add as a reference note the rezoning ordinance number. If the MH-1 portion of the site has been rezoned please state as such. DS 2-03.2.2.B.2 3. All lot line distance and bearings must be added to the plat. Revise as required. (Previous Comment: Distance and measurements of all lot lines must be indicated on the plat. Please add all lot line dimensions and bearings as required. The distance and bearings of lot 70 (Boat and RV storage Area) must be indicated including the square footage of the lot. Clarify if the 17.25 acres includes the areas for lot 70 and 71.) DS 2-03.2.4.A 4. The Common Areas have not been designated correctly, i.e. "C. A. Drainageway", "C. A. Private Street" on the plat and in the title block. Revise as required. (Previous Comment: Label each common area individually with a separate letter designation, i.e. Private Street "A", Landscape Area "B", Drainageway "C" etc. Enclose with a solid line each common area, private street, etc., that will have separate restrictions, a separate homeowners' association, or any common area that is separated by a public right-of-way.) DS 2-03.2.4.C 5. Since the rezoning of lot 73 (previously lot 71) as it is now designated has not been effectuated the existing zoning classification of SR is current. All requirements or criteria such as building setbacks screening will apply. Revise all keynotes that refer to the C-1 Zoning of lot 73 to correctly identify the not only the current zoning but the required building setback of 25 feet from the property line for lots 65 through 69. Revise the typical plot plan detail drawings accordingly. (Previous Comment: If the rezoning for lot 71 has also been effectuated please indicate the new zoning classification (C-1). If the rezoning has not been effectuated list the existing zoning classification SR. The perimeter setback adjacent to lot 71 must be based on the existing zoning classification, 25 feet if SR zoned or the height of the structure from design grade if C-1 zoned. Provide confirmation that the proposed rezoning C-1 portion (lot 71) of the site has been effectuated. (Per the rezoning case file it appears that a request for an extension of the rezoning was requested, therefore it does not appear at this time that the C-1 portion has been rezoned. Building setbacks adjacent to the proposed C-1 lot must meet setbacks for the SR zoning, 25 feet from the property line to the structure.) DS 2-03.2.4.D 6. Parking space symbols or no parking note were not added to the Honey Mesquite Drive roadway along the frontage of lots 13, 26, 70 and 71. If the "Common Area A" parking area is to serve as visitor parking for these lots they must be within 150 feet of the lots. If on street parking is not to be allowed add a "No Parking" note to the plat. The on street parking symbols should be shown as provided on the street not on the sidewalk. In addition the building setback as noted on the lot typical detail drawing as 21 feet from the nearest edge of travel lane must be revised. The two (2) feet wide wedge curb counts towards the eight (8) feet wide on street parking space. Therefore the eight (8) feet dimension must be revised to indicate that the parking spaces is from the back of the wedge curb. Revise as required. (Previous Comment: On street visitor parking spaces must be a minimum length of 23 feet. Utilizing a symbol designating an on street vehicle parking space, show the symbol on the side of the street throughout the subdivision to ensure sufficient spaces will be accommodated and provided without interfering with the proposed private driveways. Visitor parking spaces must be within 150 feet of any proposed lot to comply with Development standards 3-05.2.4.A.1) DS 2-03.2.4.G 7. It is not clear if the 25 feet dedication has been made. If it has been made and accepted by the City of Tucson please add the Docket and Page number of the document dedicating the right-of-way. (Previous Comment: Add the docket and page number of the document that dedicated the right of way for Houghton Road.) DS 2-03.2.4.H 8. Please add to the title of the CC&R's cover sheet, the number of lots and Common areas. (Previous Comment: CC&R's will be required and must be provided for review. See LUC 3.6.1.5 for further information. If preliminary copies are available at this time please submit a copy with the next submittal.) DS 2-10.3.2.E. and .F 9. Revise all titles, title block, notes that refer to the number of lots proposed for this subdivision. The number of lots proposed is 73, which includes the proposed commercial lot 73. Revise as required. (Previous Comment: Please review all general notes on sheets 1 and 2 of 9 for redundancy. General note 7 states that 69 lots will be residential and 2 lots will be commercial. According to the rezoning map lot 71 is the only area proposed for commercial zoning, lot 70 is or was to be rezoned to MH-1. Lot 70 may not be used for commercial purposes and may be used only for the residents of the subdivision. Personal storage for the general public is not allowed in the MH-1 zone. Lot 70 will need to be reclassified, as a common area for storage of private RV's or boats by the residents of the Mesquite Cove Subdivision.) 10. I acknowledge that a change or clarification of condition is proposed for the number and location of access points along the west boundary of the proposed subdivision. (Previous Comment: Rezoning condition 1.k states that 2 access points along Houghton Road and 3 along Irvington Road were permitted but the condition does not state an access point along Mesquite Ranch Road was allowed. None of the rezoning conditions indicate an allowance for a street opening From Mesquite Ranch Road to the subdivision or the RV and boat storage area. A cul-de-sac will be required at the west end of Honey Bean Drive. Condition 7 also states that access to the storage area and all lots is be from interior streets only. It appears on the drawing that a curb return or driveway opening is proposed along Mesquite Ranch Road for the Storage area. The proposed access as indicated on the plan will not be allowed, without a change to the rezoning condition 1.k by Mayor and Council.) C9-97-08 Rezoning condition 7 11. Per a conversation with Craig Gross regarding this project the proposed change from a Mobile Home Park to Single Family Home subdivision requires an approval by Mayor and Council because it is a change in concept. The change in concept is subject to further conditions placed on the site and will need to be addressed. If this is the case, further comments may be forthcoming on subsequent reviews. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S02043tp2.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised Tentative plat and response letters as requested |