Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S02-040
Review Name: CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/05/2002 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | INITIALIZE THE WORKFLOW | Completed | |
| 09/10/2002 | JIM EGAN | CITY OF TUCSON - NOT DSD | FIRE | Approved | THE TENTATIVE PLAT IS APPROVED. 9/10/02. |
| 09/12/2002 | CDRC Review Process | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S02-040 DEREK ROBERTS LANDMARK ENGINEERING, INC DREXEL MANOR |
| 09/27/2002 | GLENN HICKS | CITY OF TUCSON - NOT DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | Staff has reviewed and approved. |
| 10/01/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | LANDSCAPE | Denied | THE LANDSCAPE SECTION DOES NOT RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE PLAT AT THIS TIME. THE PLANS MUST BE REVISED AS REQUESTED IN THE COMMENTS BELOW AND AS REQUESTED BY OTHER AGENCIES. 1) Revise sheet 1 of the native plant preservation plan in conformance with City of Tucson regulations. LUC 3.8 A) The methodology identified is not consistent with City terminology. B) References to Pima County code sections are not appropriate and should be changed to cite City of Tucson codes and standards. C) Preservation requirements expressed in note B on sheet 1 are inconsistent with City regulations. DS 2-15.6.0 D) Note regarding plan revision and monitoring requirements should be revised to reflect the responsible City Agency, the City of Tucson Development Services Department. 2) Include a key to the abbreviations used in the comments column of the native plant inventory. DS 2-15.3.2 3) Revise the landscape and native plant preservation plans to include the project title and legal description used for the tentative plat. DS 2-07.2.1 4) The plans include improvements proposed for the adjacent right of way areas, indicate on the native plant preservation plans if these areas are included. DS 2-15.3.1 5) An irrigation plan is required. DS 2-06.5.4 6) The landscape should include notes regarding the maintenance standards found in DS 2-06.6.0. See also LUC 3.7.6. 7) Sheet 4 and 5 of the landscape plan include bold lines traversing many of the lots, please identify any lines or symbols used. 8) The basin landscaping proposed requires additional plantings. Refer to DS 10-01.1 the Stormwater Retention/ Detention Manual. Basins located adjacent to arterial thoroughfares should include plantings for at least 35% of the basin area. A minimum of 20 trees per acre and two shrubs for each tree should be provided. The treatment of the ground surface planes must also be identified. All areas of the site must comply with LUC 3.7.2.7 which provides for dust control treatments. Note the proposed treatments for all areas of the site. 9) Add the subdivision case number (S02-040) to the lower right corner of the plan sheets. 10) Refer DS 2-07 for the list of landscape plan content requirements and revsie the plans as appropriate. |
| 10/01/2002 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | CITY OF TUCSON - NOT DSD | ENGINEERING - TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering recommends DISAPPROVAL of this tentative plat 1. Add note to sheet 1 2. Add SVT's to sheet 4 D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dkelch1@ci.tucson.az.us |
| 10/01/2002 | CDRC Review Process | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | ZONING | Denied | FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: Drexel Manor RCP S02-034 Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL: October 1, 2002 DUE DATE: October 2, 2002 1. An applicant has one (1) year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application. This tentative plat must be approved on or before September 4, 2003. LUC 4.1.7.1 2. Fill in the S02-040 number near the title block in the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the plat, landscape and NPPO plans. Also, add the annexation case number (C15-98-07) to the lower right hand corner of all sheets. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 3. Correct the adjacent zoning designations on sheets 1, 3 and 4 of the plat to show that portions of the property to the northeast, across Felix Blvd, are also zoned R-2 and C-2, and that property to the southeast across Benson Highway is zoned MU. Also, revise sheets 1, 3 and 4 to show that the property adjacent to the northwest and to the southwest (across Benson Highway) are within unincorporated Pima County, by depicting the city limits line correctly (as shown in the location map) and removing the City of Tucson Zoning designators from the Pima County areas. DS 2-03.2.4.D 4. Add the following general note: "This subdivision is subject to Ordinance No. 9226, which established zoning in the Alvernon/Benson Highway Annexation District per C15-98-07". Also, add any conditions of annexation as a general note. DS 2-03.2.2.B.9 5. Add to general note 1 a statement that this RCP-7 development is subject to LUC Sec. 3.6.1. LUC 2.5.4.2.F.2 6. Revise RCP note 8 to also include the maximum proposed building height. Building setbacks, and compliance with Airport Hazard District height limitations, may not be verified until proposed building heights are specified. Also, because this site is within the Airport Hazard District, add the elevation above mean sea level of the northeast end of Tucson International Airport runway #21, which is 2,567 feet, and add the elevation above mean sea level of the project site to general note 17. DS 2-03.2.4.M LUC 2.8.5.7 7. Revise the last sentence in RCP note 5 to read: "…to the Development Services Department." LUC 3.6.1.4.A.5 DS 2-10.3.1.D 8. Add the recordation information for the 10-foot public utility easement, or state that it is "by final plat". Detail any other existing or proposed easements on the plat. DS 2-03.2.3.C DS 2-03.2.4.J 9. The project location map must be revised to show all recorded subdivisions by book and page numbers within the square mile shown. DS 2-03.2.1.D.3 10. Provide the approximate square footages and all dimensions of common area "A". DS 2-03.2.4.I 11. Remove the word "sideyard" from the street perimeter yard setback detail. Add lots 45 and 46 to the list of lots adjacent to a street with an ADT greater than 1,000. Remove the perimeter (side yard) setback detail and Lot Setback Requirement note #4 because, per comment 3, there is no immediately adjacent C-2 zoning, only street perimeter yards and unincorporated Pima County around the perimeter of the site. LUC 3.2.6.4 12. Revise the street yard perimeter setback detail to read: "….from back of future curb." LUC 3.2.6.5 13. Add the telephone number of the owner/developer of the project 11 to the plat. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 14. Provide a one-half (1/2) inch margin along the sides of the project on the plat. DS 2-03.2.1.B 15. Please make sure that the lot coverage calculation in RCP note 11 includes the garage square footage. LUC 3.2.9.2 16. Add a general note to the plat, which details the requirements for completion of project amenities and site improvements as stated in LUC 3.6.1.4.H. LUC 3.6.1.4.H 17. A copy of proposed CC&R's must be provided to the Zoning Review Section for review and approval prior to approval of the final plat. The CC&R's must meet the criteria of LUC 3.6.1.5 and DS 2-03.6.6. DS 2-10.3.2.E 18. All requested revisions must be made to tentative plat, landscape & NPPO plans. DS 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 10/02/2002 | CDRC Review Process | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Craig and Ferne, Attached is the transportation information for case #S02-040. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sandy White Research & Statistical Analyst Pima Association of Governments ph: 520-792-1093 x108 fax: 520-792-9151 swhite@pagnet.org |
| 10/02/2002 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 201 N. Stone Ave, 1st Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO : CITY PLANNING FROM : KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT : S02-040 DREXEL MANOR/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE : September 27, 2002 *********************************************************************************************************** The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/ addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1.) Delete "S" from "S Country Club Rd." on Location Map. 2.) Change "Los Ranchitos Book 8, Page 71" to "Los Ranchitos Number 7 Book 8, Page 71" on pgs. 1 and 3. 3.) The street labeled "Drexel Manor Place" cannot be a Place. Please choose another street name. |
| 10/02/2002 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | ENGINEERING | Denied | ===================== SUBJECT: Drexel Manor Tentative Plat Engineering Review REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach DATE: October 4, 2002 ACTIVITY NUMBER: S02-040 SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on September 9, 2002. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat or the Drainage Report. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS 1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No.2-03.2.3.G: Label existing stormdrain facilities adjacent to site. Clarify discrepancy in size of box culvert noted on page 11 of Drainage Report and shown on sheet 4 of Tentative Plat. On Drainage Exhibit 2 (existing) show all existing onsite and offsite drainage structures: a) label type and size of box culvert at CP1; b) show existing 78" grated inlet storm drain east of the site; c) clarify existing watersheds in Benson Highway; d) provide watershed identification, Q100, and drainage area for southwest watershed adjacent to lots 87-123; e) show where stormwater flows near Alvernon Way. 2) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.5: Documentation from Pima County for acceptance of proposed construction and acceptance of exit flows at northwest corner within Benson Highway right-of-way, shall be submitted. Otherwise, all construction including drainage outlet structures shall be placed within the project boundaries. 3) On page 6, clarify discussions in sections for the Offsite Hydrology (developed) and Onsite Hydrology (developed). 4) Clarify Table 9 and discussions for basins DET4 and DET5. Assure table data matches report and Tentative Plat. 5) Label locations of the warped section analyses in Appendix D. 6) Clarify scupper cell width for Drexel Heights Scuppers calculation sheet in Appendix D. Where only the 10-year flows are conveyed in the scuppers, assure with spot elevations and sections that the 100-year flows are maintained within watershed boundaries and do not exceed maximum depth of flow. 7) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.I: Check watershed for OFF1. It appears from site visit and existing contours that a portion of Felix Boulevard, between Olympia Stravenue and Drexel Road, drains westerly across the roadway section into watershed OFF3E. Provide depth of flow in roadway for Felix Boulevard between and at the intersection of Olympia Stravenue and Drexel Road. On page 5 and 9 of the Drainage Report, clarify "crowned" section for Felix Boulevard. Explain how site is "generally isolated" from offsite flows. 8) DS Sec.10-01.V.2.5: Address the following for Drainage Exhibit 3 (Developed): a) show property line; b) delineate all proposed watersheds; c) clarify concentration points (i.e. how does 9 cfs enter basin DET1?); d) assure all text is legible. 9) DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a: Provide discussion in Drainage Report for infiltration rates within basins. Provide results from percolation tests. Rates shall meet Detention / Retention criteria. 10) DS Sec.10-01.III.3.4: Provide basin DET4 velocity and erosion protection calculations. 11) On page 4, clarify dashed lines on Soils Map. 12) Based on a review calculation, an impervious number of 65% was determined for watershed evaluations in developed conditions. Explain value provided on page 7. 13) Clarify verbiage on page 9 regarding area that "will be landscaped to maximize the water that will be discharged". 14) On page 11, clarify discrepancy of elevation for Type 4 catch basin outlet elevation and that shown on sheet 4 of Tentative Plat. 15) Will a screen wall be placed at rear of lots 87-123? Provide wall opening calculation. TENTATIVE PLAT COMMENTS 16) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.C: All lettering, including contour line labels, shall be twelve (0.12) point or greater in size. 17) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.D: On location map, label adjacent subdivisions with recorded book and page numbers. Also clarify City and County jurisdictional limits. 18) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.H: Provide contour interval next to north arrow / scale at upper right corner of each sheet. 19) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.J: Assure linetypes (contours), hatching (proposed curb), and symbols (monument) match on all sheets. 20) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.A.1: Provide owner / developer's phone number on cover sheet. 21) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.B.1: Provide subdivision case number "S02-040". 22) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.B.7: Add a general note stating that the plat is designed to meet the overlay zone(s) criteria for: Sec.2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes Setback Zone; and, Sec.3.6.1, Residential Cluster Project. 23) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.G.2: Revise General Note 12 to match verbiage for this section of code. 24) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.A: For boundary data, clarify the following: a) indicate datum location on a plan view; b) label section corners (south and west quarter corners?) on sheet index plan view; c) provide degrees, minutes and seconds for basis of bearings; d) check boundary bearings, distances, curve data on sheets 3 & 4; data shall match title report exhibit "A"; e) provide one copy of boundary closure calculations. 25) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.C: There are easements and provisions listed in part two of Schedule B of Title report. Show all existing easements with recordation information, locations, widths, and purposes on the Tentative Plat. If the easement is not in use and proposed for abandonment, so indicate. 26) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.D: Provide the following existing conditions: a) cross section details for Drexel Road, Benson Highway; b) on section B on sheet 2, clarify 60-foot right-of-way dimension and 12+ foot lane width for Felix Boulevard; c) on sheets 3 and 4, label existing public right-of-way dimensions (and any MS&R future right-of-ways) and recordation data for Drexel Road, Benson Highway, and Felix Blvd. 27) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.I: Provide the following existing conditions: a) show existing curbs, and sidewalks at the corners of Felix Boulevard and Drexel Road as well as Benson Highway and Drexel Road; b) show and label existing wedge curb along Felix Boulevard; c) show tie to existing curb at the corner of Drexel Road from proposed curb and sidewalk on Felix Boulevard on sheet 3. 28) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.C: Clarify Common Areas boundaries labeled on sheets 1, 3, and 4. 29) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.F: Dimension cul-de-sacs curb returns radii. Also label radii dimensions for curves at Olympia Stravenue and Drexel Manor Avenue. 30) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.J: Label private 20-foot maintenance access easements for drainage facilities. 31) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.2: Clarify flow arrows for front or rear draining lots. 32) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.4: Provide all storm drainage inlet invert elevations. Also provide spot elevations / labeled contour lines for proposed channels to clarify slope configuration and direction of flow in basin channel. Provide cross sections at lots 123 and 116. 33) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.5: Show any drainage easements along Benson Highway. Verification of adjacent owners' permission is required for any drainage solution occurring outside the boundaries of the project. (Additional notarized documentation of that approval will be submitted with the revised drainage report.) 34) DS Sec.3-01.3.1.A.1: Clarify aggregate base course depth for flexible pavement section Detail A on sheet 2. 35) DS Sec.3-01.4.2.D: Provide detail or call-out for sidewalk ramp landing. 36) DS Sec.3-01.4.4.B: Show flow arrows showing how flows are directed at the intersection of Drexel and Alvernon Way. 37) Tucson City Code (TC) Section 25-38: Minimum distance from driveway curb cut is 4 feet from end of curb return. Dimension edge of driveway locations per this section on sheets 3 and 4 or on the Typical Lot Detail. 38) DS Sec.3-01.6.4.G: Designate a star symbol for corner lots indicating which street will be used for access. 39) DS Sec.3-01.6.4.H: Show no-vehicular access easements along Drexel Road and Benson Highway. 40) DS Sec.10-01.III.3.4: Label velocities at basin spillways and exits and associated erosion protection. Provide basin DET4 velocity and erosion protection calculations. Provide basin spillway embankment cross section details. 41) Provide cross section showing proposed pad grades, existing and proposed slopes adjacent to Benson Highway, and any proposed walls with openings. Label wall opening size and spacing for any future walls. 42) On sheet 4, clarify discrepancy of Type 4 catch basin outlet elevation and that elevation which is shown on page 11 of Drainage Report. LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS 43) Explain how water harvesting will be provided on Landscape Plan. Design shall correspond to Drainage Exhibit in Drainage Report. 44) Show sight visibility triangles for existing and proposed conditions. Provide notation for restriction of existing or proposed structures within 30" to 72" in height within the sight visibility easements. GENERAL COMMENTS 45) Proposed developments exceeding 5 acres are subject to NPDES requirements. Contact Loren Makus, 791-4251 for submittal requirements. 46) IBC Chapter 36, Section 9: A Grading Plan and Permit will be required. Grading in excess of 5,000 yards is designated as "engineered grading" and a soils engineering report is required with the Grading Plan submittal. Resubmittal is required. Submit revised Drainage Report and revised Tentative Plat. The next submittal should address all the above items. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 2204. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Section Development Services ===================== |
| 10/03/2002 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: October 2, 2002 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S02-040 Drexel Manor T151404 (140-05) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections to the final plat. Add the bearings to the lot lines; the bearings and dimensions to the street centerline and the complete curve data for the street and lots. Remove shading and stippling. Add road information for Felix Boulevard and Drexel Road. Add Common Area “B” to the title block and label Common Area “A” on the plat. Add square footage for the common areas. If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan C. King |
| 10/09/2002 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 3950 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 Telephone: 520-884-3879 Fax: 520-770-2002 WR#94304 October 4, 2002 Mr. Derek Roberts Landmark Engineering, Inc. 300 N. Main Avenue, Suite 104 Tucson, AZ 85701 Dear Mr. Roberts: SUBJECT: Drexel Manor Lots 1-123 & Common Area A S02-040 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the Tentative Plat submitted for review stamped September 4, 2002. The power for this project will probably come from the overhead primary line running along Felix Boulevard. Enclosed is a copy of TEP’s facility map showing the approximate location and unit numbers of the existing facilities. For your information, the pole line running along Felix Boulevard, from Unit #72 through Unit #175, as shown on the attached TEP facilities map, may be in conflict with the running curb and possibly the driveway entrances to the lots along Felix Boulevard. Also, pole Unit #204 may be in conflict with the extension of Olympia Stravenue, south. In the event these facilities do present a conflict, costs for relocation or removal shall be borne by the developer. ALSO, for your information, as far as this Company is concerned, No. 6, under Residential Cluster Project Data, on the front page of the Tentative Plat, does not pertain, in any way, to Tucson Electric Power Company. TEP facilities are not considered mechanical equipment, nor does TEP allow above-grade facilities (transformers & pedestals) to be screened in because of the difficulty it would create in maintaining said facilities. Page 2 TEP will provide an electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. at the customer’s written request, a design can be provided prior to the Approved Tentative Plat, however, once a design is provided, any design changes will be billable to the developer. Sincerely, S. Glynda Rothwell Right-of-Way Agent Land Management Sgr Enclosure cc: Craig Gross, City of Tucson D. Wianas, Schmac Properties, Inc. |
| 10/09/2002 | CDRC Review Process | CITY OF TUCSON - NOT DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | 09/30/02 Denied-Comments On File Manny Padilla |
| 10/17/2002 | CDRC Review Process | CITY OF TUCSON - NOT DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No objection |
| 11/13/2002 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586 Director FAX: (520) 740-6380 November 8, 2002 TO: Derek Roberts, Landmark Engineering THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division SUBJECT: Drexel Manor Tentative Plat - 1st Submittal S02-040 We have reviewed the above-referenced project on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. There is currently capacity in the existing downstream sewerage system for this development. This response is not to be construed as a commitment for conveyance capacity allocation, but rather an analysis of the existing sewerage system as of this date. 2. Based on the preliminary sewer layout as shown on the referenced tentative plat, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. 3. Add the subdivision plat case number, S02-040, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than the cross reference numbers. 4. The proposed public sewer lines in Felix Boulevard must be placed under the pavement, as required by Title 13.20.030. 5. Run a sewer line stub from Drexel Manor Place into Drexel Road for flow-through. Please Note: No oversizing credits can be given for the use of 10" sewer lines in this subdivision, as the 10" lines are not necessary to carry the expected flow-through. The 10" lines have been used only to meet minimum slope requirements. 6. Show the elevations of the contour lines using numerals 1/8" in size or greater. 7. Common Area A will need to be granted to the public as a public sewer easement on the final plat. 8. We will require a revised set of bluelines showing the necessary corrections. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6563. Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division TR/tr Copy: Project |