Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: CDRC RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S02-031
Review Name: CDRC RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/2003 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering DISAPPROVES this TP. 1. Per DS 3-01.0 figures 20, 21 no parking is allowed in cul-de-sacs. No parking signs shall be shown indicating this on the TP per rezoning case #C9-02-04,condition 11. 2. No parking in cul-de-sacs necessitates relocating visitor parking that is designated in front of lots 4/5, 17/18 and 27/28. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dkelch1@ci.tucson.az.us |
| 10/25/2002 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | INITIALIZE THE WORKFLOW | Completed | |
| 10/30/2002 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 201 N. Stone Ave, 1st Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO : CITY PLANNING FROM : KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT : S02-031 CHANTLALLI ESTATES/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE : October 28, 2002 ************************** The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/ addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1.) Change "Silver Tree Drive" to "Silverbell Tree Drive" on Sheet Index. 2.) Change "Teocally" to "Teocalli." 3.) Language review is needed for "Mechica," "Chante" and "Aztlan." |
| 10/30/2002 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 201 N. Stone Ave, 1st Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING SUPERVISOR PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO : CITY PLANNING FROM : KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT : S02-031 CHANTLALLI ESTATES/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE : November 26, 2002 *********************************************************************************************************** The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/ addressing, and we hereby approve this project. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County=s Geographic Information System. Your Support is greatly appreciated.*** |
| 11/01/2002 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S02-031 Chantlalli Estates 07/30/02 (-) Tentative Plat (-) Development Plan (-) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat (-) Board of Adjustment (-) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-02-04 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Interim Land Use Policy GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Gateway Route – Silverbell Road COMMENTS DUE BY: November 7, 2002 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: (-) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (-) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions (-) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (-) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 7.30.02 (-) Resubmittal Required: (-) Tentative Plat (-) Development Plan (-) Landscape Plan (-) Other REVIEWER: Rafael Sebba DATE: October 30, 2002 COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S02-031 Chantlalli Estates 07/31/02 ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-02-04 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Interim Land Use Policy GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Gateway Route – Silverbell Road COMMENTS DUE BY: July 31, 2002 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: Rafael Sebba DATE: July 30, 2002 COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION COMMENTS S02-031 Chantlalli Estates Subdivision This project is to comply with the conditions of Rezoning Case No. C9-02-04. Please address the following: Rezoning Condition 8 stipulates that a ten (10) foot landscape/pedestrian area shall be provided on both sides of all interior streets, measured from the back of the curb. The landscape/pedestrian area shall contain a minimum of one canopy tree for every two lots. Please relocate required canopy trees inside the 10 foot landscape area. Rezoning Condition 11 stipulates that the location of any “No Parking” signs shall be disclosed by a note on the final plat and shall be shown on the tentative plat. Please provide locations of “No Parking” signs on tentative plat where required. Rezoning Condition 14 stipulates that any required or proposed masonry screen walls shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. These screen walls shall incorporate on of the following decorative materials: (a) tile, (b) stone, (c) brick, (d) textured brick/block, (e) a coarse-textured material such as stucco or plaster, or (f) a combination of the above materials. Please include on the tentative plat a detail of the wall treatments that satisfy this requirement. Rezoning Condition 15 stipulates that any continuous wall greater than 75 feet and 3 feet in height visible from the public right-of-way shall vary in alignment (jogs, curve, setback, notch, etc.) and include trees or shrubs in the voids created by the variations. Please include on the tentative plat a detail of the wall treatments that satisfy this requirement. There appears to be a need for additional arterial modifications along Silverbell Road due the increased traffic from “Street A” and from Silverbell Tree Drive, which is directly across Silverbell Road Rezoning. In addition, Condition 3 stipulates that a seventeen (17) foot wide, 250 foot long, southbound right turn/deceleration lane and transition/tapers shall be constructed on Silverbell Road. This condition does not appear to have been met. However, Planning defers to Traffic Engineering on this matter. |
| 11/04/2002 | DAN CASTRO | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | ZONING | Denied | COMMENTS CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is July 9, 2003. 2. The SCZ case number must be noted in the lower right corner of each sheet of the tentative plat, landscape and NPPO plans. All required elements of the SCZ (i.e. 30 foot buffer, view corridors, approved colors, etc..) as shown on the approved SCZ plan must be added to the tentative plat, along with date of approval and any conditions placed on that approval. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.7/ L.U.C. 2.8.2 3. Under RCP general note number six (6) on sheet 2 of 5, revise "Planning Department" to "Development Services Department." 4. All requested revisions must be made to the Tentative Plat, Landscape and NPPO plans. |
| 11/07/2002 | JIM TATE | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | ENGINEERING | Denied | TO: Craig Gross; CDRC Coordinator DATE: November 6, 2002 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Chantlalli Estates Tentative Plat. The activity number is S02-031. SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on October 25, 2002. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat or the Drainage Report. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: TP, DR GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. 1. Please provide the Assurance package with the Final Plat review. 2. Provide a copy of the Protective Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) as outlined in Tucson Code Sec. 3.6.1.5. Include the maintenance notes as specified in Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.3.2 3. A Grading Plan and Permit will be required. IBC Chapter 36 Sec. 6. Proposed grading in excess of 5000 yards is designated as "engineering grading" and a soils engineering and engineering geology report would be required. IBC Chapter 36 Sec. 9.3 The Soils Report must also address the requirements detailed in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.2.6. 4. Proposed developments exceeding 5 acres in size are subject to NPDES requirements. Contact Loren Makus, 791-4251 for submittal requirements. TENTATIVE PLAT: 1. Keynote 18 Sheet 5 top of basin should be 2302.5. 2. Basin 2 has a 100-yr peak WSEL of 5.79. Lot 21 FFE is 6.67. Finished floor elevations of structures must be a minimum of one foot above the 100-yr. WSEL of any adjacent basin. Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual, SDRM, 3.5.1.10 3. The development is in a Hillside Development Zone. Please provide a drawing with the information required in DS 9-04..2.1 and 9-04.2.2. 4. Sheet 3 Detail E Channel 5C specifies riprap but the detail says earthen swale and the worksheet in the Drainage Report uses a Mannings coefficient for earth. 5. Rezoning condition 7 requires culverts under Silverbell Rd. Provide. 6. The cul-de-sac right-of-way was changed from the first submittal to coincide with DS 3-01 Figure 21. Although the location of the curb is located correctly, figure 21 places the property line in its normal location i.e. with the sidewalk area being part of the right of way. This plat does not include the sidewalk area as part of the right of way. The property line in the cul-de-sac should be in the same location as it is in the street section (3 ft. from back of curb). 7. The Tucson Code specifies that the Scenic Corridor buffer be left in its natural state. Channels 5A, 5B, 5C, and 7B are in the buffer. Remove. Tucson Land Use Code 2.8.2.4 8. Sheet 4 Key Note 5 gives the top of basin elevation as 2206. This should be 2306. The bottom of basin is listed as 2202. This should be 2302. Drainage Report 1. The retention calculation is using 28 acres for the area in determining the weighted runoff coefficient. The volume calculation uses the site area of 23.32 acres. The determination of the required retention volume must be based on the site area. In determining the weighted runoff coefficient, offsite watersheds are not included. Correct the weighted runoff coefficient to include only the site area and recalculate the required retention volume. 2. A soils report is required in conjunction with he design of each surface storage facility which utilizes infiltration as a method of basin drainage. The report must address, as a minimum, soil classification, soil erodibility, soil permeability, slope stability, and ground-water elevations. The report must also provide a minimum setback of building from basins. SDRM, 3.5.1.5 SMDDFM, 14.2.6 James C. Tate, P.E. Civil Engineer |
| 11/07/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | LANDSCAPE | Denied | The Landscape Section does not recommend approval of the Development Plan at this time. Development of this parcel is subject to LUC 2.8.2 Scenic Corridor Zone. Additional comments may arise in the course of the SCZ Review. 1) Based on revisions made to the plans additional comments apply. 2) Non-wood fences and gates are not permitted within the Scenic Corridor Zone. LUC 3.7.3.7.D Revise the plans to include wood fencing. 3) Identify ground plane treatments in the scenic route buffer area for the access to the ramp into retention basin 3. 4) Detail 'E' on sheet 3 indicates a barricade fence within the MS&R right of way. Fencing and freestanding walls facing the Scenic Route must meet the material restrictions in Sec. 3.7.3. Screening Requirements. 5) The drainageways proposed within the scenic route buffer area are not permitted improvements per LUC 3.7.5.2. The proposed changes to existing topography are also not consistent with LUC 2.8.2.2.C 6) Identify pedestrian connections required by rezoning condition #9. C9 02-04 |
| 12/18/2002 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586 Director FAX: (520) 740-6380 December 17, 2002 TO: Wocky Redsar, Castro Engineering Corp. THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division SUBJECT: Chantlalli Estates, Lots 1-61, Common Areas A and B, and Block A Tentative Plat - 2nd Submitttal S02-031 We have reviewed the above-referenced project on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. The tentative plat is hereby approved. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6563. Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division TR/tr Copy: Project |