Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Active
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP22-0249
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Active
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/08/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/08/2022 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Active | |
| 09/08/2022 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 09/08/2022 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 09/08/2022 | ANY | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Active | |
| 09/08/2022 | ANY | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Active | |
| 09/08/2022 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 09/08/2022 | ANY | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | Active | |
| 09/20/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Development Package (1st Review) DP22-0 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 11, 2022 DUE DATE: May 11, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is , 2023. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0249, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the rezoning case number, C9-21-05, adjacent to the title block on all sheets 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.3 - COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.3 – Provide the rezoning conditions for case C9-21-05 on the plan. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Under Zoning and Land Use Note 4 you list “USE SPECIFIC STANDARDS 4.9.10.C3 & 6” but Table 4.8-4 Multifamily Development does not have any use specific standards. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C - COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide the following information for both Wilmot & Los Reales, dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A - Under the vehicle parking calculation you list “TOWNHOMES”, townhomes at typically attached single family dwellings on individual lots that can be sold. There are no lot lines shown for the townhomes. Clarify what you are proposing as a tentative/final plat would be required if you are proposing to have townhomes on this site. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The ratio use for the 3-bedrrom townhomes is not correct. Based on a multifamily use a 3-bedroom unit only requires 2.25 spaces, based on a townhome, single-family where no on-street parking is provided the requirement is 2 spaces per dwelling and 1 visitor spaces per dwelling unit. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide the number of van accessible spaces required and provided within the vehicle parking calculation. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The short-term bicycle detail on sheet 15 does not addressed UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.e or 7.4.9.B.2.f. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – As this site is being developed as a single site, apartments & townhomes, on a single parcel provide the required sidewalk between the apartments & townhomes, see TSM Section 7-01.3.3.B. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W – Per rezoning condition 5 clearly show that the billboard located in the northwest corner of the site and indicated that it will be removed per the condition. 12. COMMENT: - Sheet 5 keynote 6 references “DETAIL N ON SHEET 14” but detail N is on sheet 15. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 09/20/2022 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Reqs Change | (View the "...correspondence as it relates..." document in the DOCUMENTS section of PRO, titled "ADOT, first submittal review comments, 09.14.22") EMAIL FROM: Jay Gomes <jgomes@azdot.gov> To: CDRC Date: 09/14/2022 ADOT has been working with the Developer, Traffic Study preparer, and COT DTM on this project and the Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) called Arroyo at Los Reales Residential Development. We previously reviewed the TIA contained within the PRO website for this DP and attached you will find correspondence as it relates to our review. We have not yet received an update on the TIA. Ultimately, we would like to coordinate with COT DTM & CDRC on the recommendations for Off-Site improvements along Wilmot Road. Thank you. Jay Gomes ADOT |
| 09/22/2022 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | Approved. View in the Documents section of PRO, titled: "TEP letter of approval, 09.15.22", "TEP Facilities map, 09.15.22", and "TEP Redline, 09.15.22". |
| 09/28/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. On the cover sheet please include the contact information for the firm that prepared the geotechnical report per Admin Manual section 2-06.4.1. 2. The drainage report calls out that the required critical basin reduction is 10% but should be 15% per edits to the newly adopted retention/detention manual: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Detention_Retention_Manual_Tech_Standards_Amemdments.pdf. Revise as needed. 3. Engineering will accept the underground detention/retention as proposed as long as landscaping is good with the water harvesting. 4. A floodplain use permit will be required for this project and a floodplain use permit and elevation certificate will be required for each building that borders the wash (buildings 1-5, 14,16-17). Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/03/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Revise the site utility drawings to indicate that backwater valves will not be required for buildings 6, 7, 15, and 16 because in each case, the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole is 12" or more below the proposed first floor elevations. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 10/04/2022 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | All Buildings require aerial access. Buildings meet the requirement however, a note shall be added to the plans that those areas are for aerial access and shall not have trees, carport covers or solar installed in those areas. Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033 |
| 10/04/2022 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | email from: Howard Dutt To: CDRC 10/03/2022 No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard Dutt, RLA Project Manager/Landscape Architect Parks and Recreation | City of Tucson Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/13/2022 | DSTIFFE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | DP22-0249 Comments: 1. A PIA is going to be required for this project. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/tdot/private-improvement-agreement Contact TDOT Engineering for information. DOT-Engineering-Review-Section@tucsonaz.gov Or call. 520-791-5100 Jesus Villezcas David Stiffey DTM Project Coordinator David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/20/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Arroyo at Los Reales ACTIVITY NO: DP22-0249 Parcel: 140-44-248A Zoning: C-2 Existing Use: previously graded vacant land Proposed Use: Multi-family TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 20, 2022 DUE DATE: October 3, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 1. Water harvesting areas should be depressed between 6 and 9 inches. If using d.g. at 2” depth, make sure that the water harvesting basins are 8” deep to allow for d.g. depth. Make sure that grading, water harvesting and landscape plans match, as well as details. 2. Engineer comment - Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. Show how First flush volumes relate to plant water demand. See pages 9-16 and Tables 2.2 and 2.3. 3. Engineer & LA comment - The tables 2.2 and 2.3, pages 12-13 in the PCRFCD Manuel can be used in lieu of the Water Budget Table, the only thing that is missing is water demand for plants, which can be added. Make sure units match. 4. Engineer Comment – Water harvesting plan and Grading Plan do not match. Show rooftop drainage patterns on grading plans. Identify splash pads or other erosion control from the roof to landscape areas on grading plans. 5. Engineer Comment – How are the southern water harvesting basins connected to each other? Demonstrate how water is flowing into those basins. 6. Engineer Comment – Flow lines do not match water harvesting plan in the small parking area south of Bldg. 5. 7. Engineer Comment – inlets to basins are not clear on grading plan, please label clearly. 8. Please provide all landscape calculations on the landscape plan, including oasis requirements, Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.A.2.c and landscape borders, UDC Technical Standards 2-10.4.2.f & g. 9. What does amenity (oasis) areas by separate instrument mean? Is this a phased development? 10. Please label the existing and future rights of way for all public streets, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |