Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP22-0247
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/22/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/22/2022 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | Approved. View in the Documents section of PRO: "TEP letter of approval, 09.15.22", and "TEP facilities map, 09.15.22". |
| 09/22/2022 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 09/22/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: River Terrace Development Package (1st Review) DP22-0247 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 16, 2022 DUE DATE: September 29, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is August 31, 2023. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0247, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – Revise Permitting Note 5 to include 5.3 SCENIC CORRIDOR ZONE (SCZ) 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – Sheet C3.1 eastern building there is a 30’ sewer easement that runs under the northwest corner of the building. This easement will either need to be abandoned, modified or written permission from Pima County Waste Water for the building to be within their easement. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B - Sheet C3.2 the 10’ Zoning acknowledges that you wish to have a hold put on the building C of O for release of the electrical easement shown on sheet C3.2 but until a building plan is submitted Zoning is not able to do this. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The required number of accessible vehicle parking spaces is not correct. Per 2018 IBC Table 1106.1 the required number of accessible vehicle parking spaces is based on the 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Provide heights fence and wall called out under keynotes 13 & 14 so that perimeter yard setback requirements can be determined, UDC Article 6.6.2.I. 7. COMMENT: PAD-41 River Terrace Part IV.A states “PAD design guidelines will be applied to the VC planning area where appropriate, and in some cases, the guidelines will be required review by the River Terrace Design Review Board”. Contact Elisa Hamblin, Zoning Administrator, to determine it review is required. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 09/22/2022 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 09/22/2022 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 09/26/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. On the cover sheet please include the contact information for the firm that prepared the geotechnical report per Admin Manual section 2-06.4.1. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/28/2022 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | email from: Howard Dutt To: CDRC 09/27/2022 No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard Dutt, RLA Project Manager/Landscape Architect Parks and Recreation | City of Tucson Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/29/2022 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA COUNTY - REGIONAL FLOOD CTRL DIST | Reqs Change | View comments in DOCUMENTS section of PRO, titled: "Pima Co Reg Flood Control, first submittal review comments, 09.28.22" |
| 09/29/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 09/29/2022 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Reqs Change | email from: Lena Porell To: CDRC 09/28/2022 Entitlements has the following comments on River Terrace, 1st Submittal Review: DP22-0247: The PAD requires that the Design Guidelines be developed prior to any DP being submitted; Has that been done, and have they been shared with PDSD? PAD design guidelines will be applied to the VC planning area where appropriate and the guidelines will require review by the River Terrace Design Review Board (RTDRB). Due to the integration of uses promoted in the PAD, compatibility design for mixing residential and commercial land uses within the Village Court will be addressed. The Developer will be responsible for establishing the RTDRB. The Board will consist of a minimum of five members responsible for review and approval of architectural styles, screen wall design, entry features, landscape plans, utility design and construction, and signage design. Has the review board been created? Contact information for the board should be provided to PDSD. Thank you, Lena Porell Lead Planner, Advanced Planning Division Planning and Development Services | City of Tucson lena.porell@tucsonaz.gov main 520.791.5550 | direct 520.837.4973 |
| 09/29/2022 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 10/13/2022 | DSTIFFE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | DP22-0247 Comments: 1. A PIA is going to be required for this project. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/tdot/private-improvement-agreement Contact TDOT Engineering for information. DOT-Engineering-Review-Section@tucsonaz.gov Or call. 520-791-5100 Jesus Villezcas David Stiffey DTM Project Coordinator David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/17/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: River Terrace ACTIVITY NO: DP22-0247 Address: 2850 E River Rd Zoning: PAD-41 Existing Use: residential, natural desert Proposed Use: Food Service, Multi-family TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 17, 2022 DUE DATE: September 29, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 1. FYI only - Engineer & LA comment - The tables 2.2 and 2.3, pages 12-13 in the PCRFCD Manuel can be used in lieu of the Water Budget Table (which is incorrect), the only thing that is missing is water demand for plants, which can be added. Make sure units match. 2. All water harvesting areas should be depressed between 6 and 9 inches, if covered with d.g at 2” depth, then the basins have to be 8-11” deep. These areas can be counted toward first flush retention requirements. Please add a detail to show depressed landscape areas or indicate with notes. 3. The basin floor requires something other than bare dirt, hydroseed or rock larger than 4” is acceptable. 4. Unless these drawings are going to become your construction documents, all of the specification sheets are unnecessary, as is the Landscape Cover sheet, that information should all be on the Development Package cover sheet. 5. General plant symbol comments – The plant symbols are difficult to read and there are many graphic conflicts. Please simplify for readability. 6. General plant comments – consider other species for the parking areas, Schinus molle is very messy and Quercus is very slow growing. Nerium oleander and rosmarinus and lantana were often used in the past prior to sustainability practices. Consider using native or near-native plants and pollinators, especially instead of using almost 800 lantanas. Creosote in containers tend to die easily 7. The street border along River Rd. should mimic natural desert, linear plantings are too formal. 8. The City has specific notes that must be on a development plan, provide a maintenance schedule for the landscape and irrigation for this project. UDC 7.6.8, Admin Manual 2-10-4.2.A.4. and Technical Standards 5-01.9. Consolidate LA0.1,, 2, and all other pages with notes to only 1 page. 9. LA0.2 has references to a different project than this DP. 10. Add salvage quantities on planting plans. 11. Decomposed granite cover over the entire project is not acceptable, River Road requires a natural desert in line with the Scenic Corridor requirements. The retention/detention and Water Harvesting Basin require larger dimensions than ½” screened d.g. 12. Please modify landscape calculations on the landscape plan, It appears that the 50% groundcover is not met, but there is no way to confirm. Provide dimensions on the plans for the street landscape border. 13. Please label the existing and future rights of way for all public streets, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 14. Please label the separate irrigation meter “irrigation only”. UDC Technical Standards 4-01.6.1.A.1. 15. Identify the type of irrigation controller with soil moisture gauge, tensiometer, weather station and/or evaportranspiration data. UDC Tech Standards 4-01.4.A. 16. Provide a detail to show tree planting with root barrier adjacent to walkways. 17. All High and Medium viability trees are required to be salvaged or mitigated. accordance with Sections 7.7.3.D.3 & .4 of the Unified Development Code (UDC) and Admin. Manual Section 2-11.0.0 prior to Grading Plan approval. Please double check for accuracy. 18. Please sort the Plant Inventory spread sheet by species for ease of checking calculations. 19. Please identify the project monitor prior to any grading activities, UDC 7.7.5. On-monitoring of all aspects of site clearing, grading, plant protection, preservation, salvage, and mitigation must be provided during project construction at the expense of the developer for all residential development that is over five acres and for all commercial and industrial development that is over one acre . The monitoring must be performed by an individual who is qualified in arid lands native plant resource identification and protection as specified in UDC Section 7.7.4.D, Professional Expertise. The monitor must provide periodic progress reports to the developer outlining the status of work accomplished and any problems encountered. A copy of these reports must be submitted to the PDSD for the project file. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/18/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | email from: COTDSDPermits To: Jason Morse 10/18/2022 REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP22-0247 Site/Grading/Swppp/Floodplain - River Terrace. Multi-family development with associated parking and landscaping. 2850 E RIVER RD FEE BALANCE: $ 2,473.66 ONLINE PAYMENTS ** If the online amount doesn't match "Fee Balance" above, check again in a few hours ** https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this blank 4- "Continue" 5- In the Pay column - check the boxes YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on the blue tab - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. Title your SECOND submittal documents accordingly, example: 2_Comment Response Letter 3. UPLOAD documents to Filedrop: - Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) - Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) - Documents requested by review staff FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - "Existing Application" - "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff) Sharon Beasley, Certified Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning & Development Services Dept. Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov |
| 10/18/2022 | CHRIS POIRIER | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Needs Review |