Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: DP22-0245
Parcel: 14103028A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP22-0245
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/01/2022 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
09/01/2022 SBEASLE1 UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Reqs Change Requires changes.

View in Documents section of PRO, titled:
"TEP review comments, first submittal, 09.19.2022",
"TEP Facilities Map, 09.19.2022", and
"TEP Redline, 09.19.2022".
09/01/2022 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed
09/01/2022 SBEASLE1 UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Passed
09/01/2022 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed
09/14/2022 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT: Arizona Auto Parts – Phase 2
Development Package (1st Review)
DP22-0245

TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 14, 2022

DUE DATE: September 22, 2022

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is August 25, 2023.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.A – Remove the reference to “PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN” from the title block on all sheets.

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0245, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – General note 2 remove the reference to “VACANT” and show the existing use as Salvaging and Recycling.

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Clearly demonstrate on the plan how the requirements of 4.9.5.C.8 will be controlled for the entire area south of the Proposed 2,500 S. F. Storage Building along the entire street frontage.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Provide a front street perimeter yard setback dimension from the Proposed 2,500 S. F. Storage Building to the street property line, see UDC Article 6.4.5.C.1.a.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov.

To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
09/15/2022 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
09/20/2022 SBEASLE1 COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved EMAIL FROM: Howard Dutt
To: CDRC
09/20/2022

No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development.

Howard Dutt, RLA
Project Manager/Landscape Architect

Parks and Recreation | City of Tucson
Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov
main 520.631.2030
09/21/2022 SBLOOD1 ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change 1. The drainage report has a table for first flush goals and volumes retained, however, what appears to be missing is the calculations supporting the results from the table, for example how the first flush volume goals were calculated. Provide complete discussion, calculations, tables, and exhibits to establish accomplishment of first flush requirements. Include an exhibit comparable to Figure 2.1 in the Retention/Detention Manual that shows undisturbed area, disturbed area, impervious surfaces, non-contributing basins with landscape, stormwater harvesting basins including first flush, watershed #, stormwater harvesting basin #, and flow direction. Also include both tables 2.2 and 2.3 in the same section of the Retention/Detention Manual to demonstrate required/achieve retention volumes.

2. Infiltration tests for new basins will be required to confirm basin draw down times before final inspections.
3. Before approval we will need documentation that shows acceptance from gas line operator for work shown in the gas line easement.

Stephen Blood
(520) 837-4958
Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov
09/26/2022 JPEELDA1 COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
09/27/2022 DSTIFFE1 COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved
10/03/2022 AWARNER1 LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL
TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination
FROM: Anne Warner, RLA
PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section

PROJECT: Arizona Auto Parts
ACTIVITY NO: DP22-0245
Address: 6671 E Littletown Rd
Zoning: I-2
Existing Use: Salvaging and recycling, undisturbed desert
Proposed Use: Salvaging and recycling

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 3, 2022
DUE DATE: September 22, 2022
COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed.
This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting.
General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
1. Demonstrate how water harvesting is being maximized. If there are no plants in retention basins, they are not counted as water harvesting basins or infiltration areas.
2. If using d.g. at 2” depth, make sure that the water harvesting basins are 8” deep to allow for d.g. depth. Make sure that grading, water harvesting and landscape plans match, as well as details.
3. Engineer Comment- Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. First flush volumes should be directed to landscape areas. See pages 9-16 and Tables 2.2 and 2.3. https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-manual-board-version-201511.pdf
COT edits - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Detention_Retention_Manual_Tech_Standards_Amemdments.pdf
4. Engineer & LA comment - The tables 2.2 and 2.3, pages 12-13 in the PCRFCD Manuel can be used in lieu of the Water Budget Table, the only thing that is missing is water demand for plants, which can be added. Make sure units match.
5. The grading plan and water harvesting plan do not meet the requirements of the water harvesting ordinance and technical standard. The plan doesn't show the effective use of run-off to supplement irrigation.
a. The catchment areas must provide water to the infiltration areas. Revise the grading to direct runoff to the landscape infiltration areas to the maximum extent possible.
b. Catchment areas in the water harvesting table can only count the areas that are directed to the landscape infiltration areas.
c. Clearly show the areas in each catchment area and the areas of effective infiltration and water harvesting. All landscape areas should be included within infiltration areas.
d. UDC section 7.6.6.C requires the use of all runoff to supplement irrigation. Show how this is attained.
e. Provide a planting inventory or some other mechanism so we can confirm the canopy areas for each water harvesting infiltration area. Ensure all on-site landscape areas are accounted in the canopy area.
f. Show rooftop drainage patterns and show how they are incorporated into the water harvesting calculations.
g. Water harvesting areas should be depressed between 6 and 9 inches. These areas can be counted toward first flush retention requirements.
6. The landscape, water harvesting, and grading plans must match.
7. Identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on grading and water harvesting plans.
8. Please add a detail to show depressed landscape areas or indicate with notes.
9. Retention/detention basins should be designed naturally and organically, whenever practicable. Square and rectangles are not organic shapes.
10. Please label the existing and future rights of way for all public streets, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a.
11. On DP19-0194 it appears that a lot of landscaping shown on the plans was not installed. Use different plant symbols for existing plants to clearly show what was installed, not just shown on the plans.
12. Please show the location of the existing water meter on irrigation plans, or provide reference. UDC Technical Standards 4-01.6.1.A.1.
13. Identify the existing irrigation controller, which should have a soil moisture gauge, tensiometer, weather station and/or evaportranspiration data. UDC Tech Standards 4-01.4.A.
14. Provide a maintenance schedule for the landscape and irrigation for this project. UDC 7.6.8, Admin Manual 2-10-4.2.A.4. and Technical Standards 5-01.9., please be specific.
15. The tributary to Pima Air Museum requires an ERR report unless all of the 100 year floodplain is treated as a Protected Riparian Area, and labeled as such, on the plans and the 100 year floodplain is clearly labeled. The PIP trees indicated within the floodplain cannot be used for Preservation Credits.
16. Please note that the trees in the ret/det basin need to be inventoried, and should be included in NPP inventory UDC 7.7.6.
17. Please distinguish between the mitigation/salvage plants and the other required plants on the legend, symbol or any other method that would communicate the information.
18. Please sort the plant spreadsheet by species rather than number.
19. The monitor is responsible for an assessment of the condition of the site’s plants one year after the final inspection has been performed on the site. The monitor shall visit the site and prepare a report on plant status, including general plant condition, the identification of plants under stress and the appropriate method to relieve the stress, and recommendations for replacement of plants that are dead or dying. Dead or dying plants must be replaced with the same size plant at a one-to-one ratio of like genus and species. Copies of the report must be submitted to the site owner/developer and to PDSD. The owner must respond to the plant needs as outlined in the status report within six months of report submittal or within a shorter period if required to improve the health of stressed plants and prevent plant loss.
20. Please identify the project monitor prior to any grading activities, UDC 7.7.5. On-monitoring of all aspects of site clearing, grading, plant protection, preservation, salvage, and mitigation must be provided during project construction at the expense of the developer for all residential development that is over five acres and for all commercial and industrial development that is over one acre . The monitoring must be performed by an individual who is qualified in arid lands native plant resource identification and protection as specified in UDC Section 7.7.4.D, Professional Expertise. The monitor must provide periodic progress reports to the developer outlining the status of work accomplished and any problems encountered. A copy of these reports must be submitted to the PDSD for the project file.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package

YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop
https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp
Select "Existing Application"
1) Comment Response Letter (your response to
the reviewer's Requires changes comments)
2) Plan Set (or individual sheets)
3) Any other items requested by review staff

If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov
10/03/2022 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Completed
10/18/2022 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change email from: COTDSDPermits
to: natalee w.
10/18/2022

REVIEW NOTICE
Returned for Corrections: DP22-0245
Site/Grading/Swppp - Arizona Auto Parts, Phase Two. Auto recycling and salvaging yard.

Fee Balance: $0 (zero)

YOUR NEXT STEPS
1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro
- Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number
- Permits - click on the blue tab
- Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS
- Documents section - click on VIEW

2. Title your SECOND submittal documents accordingly, example: 2_Comment Response Letter

3. UPLOAD documents to Filedrop:
- Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments)
- Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made)
- Documents requested by review staff

FILEDROP
https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp
- "Existing Application"
- "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff)


Sharon Beasley, Certified Permit Specialist

City of Tucson, Planning & Development Services Dept.
Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov
10/18/2022 SBEASLE1 PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING Needs Review