Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Active
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP22-0226
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Active
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/19/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/19/2022 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 08/19/2022 | ANY | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Active | |
| 08/19/2022 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 08/19/2022 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 08/22/2022 | FRANK PODGORSKI | HPZ ADVISORY BOARD | HPZ ADVISORY BOARD DATE | Needs Review | Property is located within the Armory Park Historic Preservation Zone and as such must be reviewed by the Armory Park Historic Zone Advisory Board and the Tucson Pima County Historical Commission Plans Review Subcommittee. |
| 08/24/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Shiner Armory Park Lots 1-6 Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0226 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 24, 2022 DUE DATE: September 01, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is August 10, 2023. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0226, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – Clarify what the accessory building is that is shown on lot 1. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Based on discussions with staff it has been determined that the vehicle parking calculation is no correct. Lots 4, 5 & 6 do not front on a street with parking on both sides, UDC Article 7.4.6.B.2.b, therefore the calculation needs to be revised to show that 3 visitor spaces are required for Lots 4, 5, & 6 and Lots 1, 2 & 3 require 1 visitor space. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The required north perimeter yard setback to the north project boundary, based on a wall height of 16.25’, should be 10.83’. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The required street perimeter yard setback to 4th Ave, based on a wall height of 24.16’, should be 24.16’ as measured to the back of curb. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The required east perimeter yard setback to the east project boundary, based on a wall height of 16.25’, should be 10’-10”. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The required street perimeter yard setback to 18th St, based on a wall height of 24.16’, should be 24.16’ as measured to the back of curb. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The required street perimeter yard setback to 18th St, based on a wall height of 16.25’, should be 21.00’ as measured to the back of curb. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The required street perimeter yard setback to Herbert Ave, based on a wall height of 16.25’ should be 8.125’ as measured to the back of curb. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – List the setback requirements for interior lots on the plan, see 8.7.3.L If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 08/31/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (9891-04, 2411.46') is more than 12"below the first floor elevation of building 1 (2413.50') and building 2 (2412.85'). Backwater valves shall not be installed per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 09/06/2022 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | Passed | email from: Nicholas Jordan To: CDRC 09/06/2022 This project does not require review by Pima County Addressing. We will participate in the Final Plat review. Thank you Nicholas Jordan Site Review Project Manager - Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 |
| 09/07/2022 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | email from: Howard Dutt To: CDRC 09/01/2022 No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard Dutt, RLA Project Manager/Landscape Architect Parks and Recreation | City of Tucson Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov main 520.631.2030 |
| 09/08/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Needs Review | Landscape/irrigation plan required per UDC 8.7.3.H. |
| 09/10/2022 | ANY | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | WRITE DECISION LETTER | Active | |
| 09/12/2022 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Reqs Change | Changes requested. View letter in DOCUMENTS section of PRO - "TAA review comments, first submittal, 09.01.22". |
| 09/13/2022 | DSTIFFE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | DP22-0226 Comments: (Pg. 4- Site Plan) 1. Any existing curb, sidewalk and curb access ramps which are not compliant with current standards will be modified or replaced to meet current standards. 2. New Concrete Curb shall be per P.A.G. standard 209. 3. Concrete sidewalk per P.A.G. standard 200. New sidewalk is to be 5 Ft. wide. 4. Connect new sidewalk to existing per P.A.G. standard 203. (Taper from 4 Ft wide to 5 Ft. wide.) 5. Concrete curb access ramp per P.A.G. standard 207. 6. Existing curb may remain if it is compliant with current standards. 7. Existing sidewalk may remain if it is compliant with current standards. 8. New Driveway Apron's per P.A.G. standard 206. (Keynote No. 20, shall be standard 206 driveway aprons.) David Stiffey DTM Project Coordinator David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/14/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide written approval from DTM (David Marhefka) for landscaping/water harvesting in the right-of-way. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/20/2022 | JVINCEN1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 10/03/2022 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Reqs Change | email from: TEP-DEVREV <TEPDEVREV@tep.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2022 8:20 AM To: CDRC <CDRC@tucsonaz.gov> Subject: Shiner Armory Park, S22-054 TEP has reviewed plans received on September 12th, 2022, the plat for the Shiner Armory Park, Lots 1 through 6 subdivision. Please note that TEP is awaiting customer approval of the Preliminary Construction Design. Customer approval and a copy of the Approved Tentative Plat are required for TEP to prepare a final Construction Drawing. If revisions to the preliminary design are needed, easements are required for TEP facilities if not appropriately recorded on the final subdivision plat. They will need to be obtained by a separate instrument. Costs for removing or relocating existing TEP facilities will be billable to the developer. The customer is responsible for compliance with City Ordinances. Please note a jurisdictional permit for any work on a public road right of way where applicable. Tucson Electric Power Co. Land Resources Department, attn: Diane |