Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Stopped
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP22-0225
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Stopped
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/22/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Stop | |
| 08/22/2022 | ANY | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Stopped | |
| 08/22/2022 | SBEASLE1 | WWM | REVIEW | Reqs Change | To: Applicant From: Planning & Development Services Dept. At your request, Pima County Wastewater was included in the review of this project. Please contact Pima County by email: Sewer@Pima.gov, or phone 520-724-6500 to request their approval. Submit the approval letter to the City of Tucson with your next submittal. Thank you. |
| 08/22/2022 | ANY | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Stopped | |
| 08/22/2022 | SBEASLE1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Reqs Change | To: Applicant From: Planning & Development Services Dept. At your request, Tucson Water was included in the review of this project. Please contact Tucson Water to request a Water Availability letter. Include the Letter in your next submittal. Thank you. |
| 08/22/2022 | ANY | COT NON-DSD | MAILING LABELS | Stopped | |
| 08/22/2022 | ANY | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | Stopped | |
| 08/23/2022 | FRANK PODGORSKI | HPZ ADVISORY BOARD | HPZ ADVISORY BOARD DATE | Needs Review | The property at 343 S Scott is a contributing resource to the Armory Park Historic Preservation Zone. Any exterior work requires review by the Armory Park Historic Zone Advisory Board and the Tucson Pima County Historical Commission Plans Review Subcommittee. |
| 08/24/2022 | JGARCIA1 | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/08/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Glenwood Townhomes - FLD Development Package (1st Review) – HC-3 DP22-0225 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 8, 2022 DUE DATE: September 14, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is August 08, 2023. 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.2.2 – Remove the aerial photo from the development package. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.B – As this is a resubdivision of an existing platted parcel provide a statement within the title block that this is a resubdivision and provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.C – Provide number of proposed lots and common areas within the title block. As functional open space is required and common parking is proposed common areas are required. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0225, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.B – Label all streets that abut the subject property on the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The proposed use is not correct, “SINGLE FAMILY TOWNHOMES” is not a use classified in the UDC. The use should be listed as “SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED, FLD, SUBJECT TO UDC ARTILE 8.7.3”. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.5 – Provide a general note stating the total number of lots proposed. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – Provide a general note stating the floor area for each building. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Provide a site coverage calculation on the plan the meets the requirements of UDC Article 6.4.3 per UDC Article 8.7.3.D.3. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A – Clearly show the proposed property lines on the plan along with distance and bearings. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.C - As functional open space and common vehicle parking is proposed it should be shown as a common area. Label each common area individually with a separate letter designation. Enclose with a solid line each common area, private street, etc., that will have separate restrictions, a separate homeowners' association. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F – Label the zoning for the parcels south of 14th. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Per UDC Article 8.7.3.I.2 An alley abutting an existing development shall not be used for parking access. A Board of Adjustment for Variance will need to be approved for alley access. If the Board of Adjustment is approved provide the case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets and provided a general note stating the case number, date of approval, what was modified and if applicable any conditions of approval. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Per UDC Article 8.7.3.I Parking shall comply with Section 7.4, Motor Vehicle and Bicycle Parking, applicable sections of Section 7.6.4.B, Landscaping and Screening in Vehicular Use Areas, and the Technical Standards Manual, applicable regulations related to accessibility. Demonstrate that the existing parking meets these requirements. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – There is a note on sheet 1 stating “MOTOR VEHICLE AND BICYLE PARKING ARE NOT REQUIRED UNDER DOWNTOWN PARKING DISTRICT, UDC SECTIN 7.4.5.b & 7.4.6.B”, this site is not located within the Downtown Parking District. Remove this note from the plan and provide a vehicle parking space calculation. This calculation shall show the number required and provided for the prior office and for the proposed single family attached units. As long as the number required for the prior use is more intense than the proposed use no additional parking is required, see UDC Article 7.4.3.D.2.b. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The proposed “REVISED PARKING LAYOUT” shown along 14th will need to be approved by COY DTM. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Demonstrate how the requirements of 8.7.3.J.2 & 3 are met on the plan. 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS) 18. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.C – Delineate the boundaries of the proposed functional open space on the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.C – Detail “A” sheet 3 only provides the square footage of the proposed functional open space. Clearly demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Article 8.7.3.F are met on the plan. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.D – Provide dimensioned building elevations of all proposed units. The elevations can be preliminary drawings. 21. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.G.1 – As functional open space and common parking is proposed provide a copy of the protective covenants or common use agreements for any shared areas being established by easements over individually-owned property. 22. COMMENT: - Provide written documentation that the requirements of UDC Article 8.7.3 .P.b.(1) have been met. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 09/13/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 09/13/2022 | DSTIFFE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 09/19/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Reference the previous subdivision plat in the title block. 2. Provide documentation of approval from DTM of the revised parking layout along E 14th St. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/20/2022 | ANY | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Stopped | |
| 09/20/2022 | JVINCEN1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 09/20/2022 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | email from: Howard Dutt To: CDRC 09/13/2022 No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard Dutt, RLA Project Manager/Landscape Architect Parks and Recreation | City of Tucson Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov main 520.631.2030 |
| 09/20/2022 | ANY | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Stopped | |
| 09/26/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved |