Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP22-0213
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/15/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/15/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | (The comments below are from the OK to Submit) 1. The general notes on the plan sheet don't match the proposed project. Revise the notes to apply to this site. 2. The application describes a property different from the property on the plans. Provide consistent documentation. 3. The plans need to provide onsite maneuvering so vehicles don't have to back into Oracle Road if they cannot get into the gate. See Tucson Code 25-42. 4. The proposed fence doesn't allow the eastmost parking spaces to maneuver in and out of the spaces. These parking spaces must be revised. Loren Makus loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/17/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Wildcat Inn Housing - Fencing Development Package (1st Review) DP22-0213 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 17, 2022 DUE DATE: August 25, 2022 COMMENT: Resubmit revised drawings and a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is August 03, 2023. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – The sheet index is not correct. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0213, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The use listed under Property Summary is not a use classified in the UDC, clarify what the use is? 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As Oracle Rd is designated as an Arterial Gateway on the COT MS&R map provide a general note stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R) & UDC ARTICLE 5.5 GATEWAY CORRIFOR ZONE (GCR)”. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – The proposed one-way access does not allow for correct access to the existing angled vehicle parking. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Keynote 4 calls out to relocated parking blocks, provide a dimension for the blocks that meets the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – As the proposed fence along the east side of the ramada appears to push the vehicle parking to the east, provide a parking space depth dimension and a PAAL width dimension that demonstrate that the UDC requirements are maintained. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Cleary demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.D.2.b are met for the northern most parking space located east of the ramada. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Keynote 1 calls out an 8’-0” high fence and it does not appear that the fence is meeting street perimeter yard setbacks in several locations clearly demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 6.6.2.I.1 are met. If the proposed fence does not meet this requirement a Board of Adjustment for Variance will be required. Review UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 and Table 6.4.5.C-1 and provide street setback dimensions on the plan. As Oracle Rd is designated as an Arterial Gateway on the COT MS&R Map all street perimeter yard setbacks are considered developing area setbacks. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – As the proposed fence along Elm & 13th is located within the right-of-way some type of easement maybe required. Contact COT Real Estate. 11. COMMENT: - Remove the general notes as they do not appear to apply to this project. 12. COMMENT: - Under Property Summary you reference “ELECTRICAL SERVICE YARD MODIFICATION”, it does not appear that this applies to this project. 13. COMMENT: - Under Property Summary Setbacks you reference “ZONES (I-1)” remove this reference as it does not apply. 14. COMMENT: - Along Elm & 13th Keynote 4 appears to point to the proposed fence but the keynote references parking blocks. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 08/22/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/08/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | email from: COTDSDPermits To: Kristen Dibone 09/08/2022 Returned for Corrections: DP22-0213 Site: Wildcat Inn. New security fencing on east, west, south. (Owner is City of Tucson) 1701 N ORACLE RD FEE BALANCE: $ 429.00 ONLINE PAYMENTS ** If the online amount doesn't match "Fee Balance" above, check again in a few hours ** https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this blank 4- "Continue" 5- In the Pay column - check the boxes YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on the blue tab - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. Title your SECOND submittal documents accordingly, example: 2_Comment Response Letter 3. UPLOAD documents to Filedrop: - Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) - Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) - Documents requested by review staff FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - "Existing Application" - "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff) Sharon Beasley Certified Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning & Development Services Dept. Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (for development packages, land splits, Thursday Presubmittal meetings) Email: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov (for building permits) |
| 09/08/2022 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Fire department apparatus access lanes shall be 20’ wide. IFC 2018, Chapter 5, Section 503.2.1 Dimensions. Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of 20’, exclusive of shoulders, except for approved security gates in accordance with Section 503.6, and an unobstructed vertical clearance of 15’ (TFD modification from 13 to 15’) Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Tucson Fire Department Fire Plans Examiner Fire Inspector I, II and Fire Alarm Plans Examiner Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov Desk: 520-837-7033 |