Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP22-0189
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/09/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/09/2022 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Passed | |
| 08/09/2022 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 08/09/2022 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 08/09/2022 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 08/12/2022 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Reqs Change | (View the following in the DOCUMENTS section of PRO, titled: "ADOT Exhibit A, access improvements", "ADOT, Transportation Impact Analysis (DRAFT), May 2022", and "ADOT letter to EPS Group regarding Traffic Impact Analysis, 07.08.2022".) Email from: Jay Gomes <jgomes@azdot.gov> To: CDRC 08/11/22 ADOT has comments on the development and is providing documents for this DP file. The DP file should note that this Development is a part of a larger planned project with the following comments. ADOT received a TIA for this Development which included a Residential portion for the entire northwest quadrant of I-10 and Wilmot, called Arroyo at Los Reales, see attached TIA and Site Proposal. We have provided comments on the TIA report and are awaiting revisions/resubmittal for the TIA for acceptance, see attached correspondence. ADOT supports this Development (for the Self-Storage) and is hereby informing CDRC that there will be Off-Site Improvement requirements along Wilmot Road and for a new roadway within the total Development footprint. It is our recommendation that the City work with the Developer to ensure the new roadway within the Site and the Off-Site Improvements along Wilmot Road are accomplished. We believe Off-Site Improvements along Wilmot should be required of the Residential Development, and not this self storage. I have copied Mr. Orsini from DTM for his awareness. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns regarding this item. Jay Gomes Arizona Dept. of Transportation |
| 08/19/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Development Package Comments: Sheet 1 1. Provide a Key Map on the cover sheet including the following: street names, lot numbers, adjacent parcel information, adjacent street names, north arrow, scale (no smaller than 1"=400'). 2. Provide a brief legal description with the Location Map. 3. Provide the name and date of the geotechnical report. Provide the name, address, and phone number of the firm who prepared the report. Sheet 3 4. Show project area on site plan. 5. Provide distance and bearing of property line east of 1/2" REBAR "RLS 12214". 6. Identify whether monuments are found vs set. 7. Add zone linetype to legend on sheet 1. 8. Add easement linetype to legend on sheet 1. 9. Provide road recording information for all roads bordering the project- site. 10. Identify the hatch in the south east corner of the viewport. Label and add to the legend on sheet 1. 11. The arrow on the callout for the center line of I-10 does not appear to be pointing to the correct line. Please verify. 12. Please clarify if Civil is stamping survey information or should RLS stamp survey information. 13. Verify all linework is labeled and add all linetypes and symbols to the legend on sheet 1 (typ, all sheets). 14. All abandoned easements must be in effect before approval or with holder's consent. Sheet 4 15. Provide a list of all abbreviations on sheet 1 (typ, all sheets). 16. Show and label significant conditions (fences, structures, etc.) as "to be removed" or "to be retained". 17. Label the dashed lines adjacent to the property lines and add the linetypes to the legend on sheet 1. 18. Reference any and all Adjacent Projects. 19. Show existing and proposed site visibility triangles. 20. Per UDC table 7.4.6-2: One-way PAAL within a Storage Use development must have a minimum width of 20 feet. The PAAL along the north and east side of the building are currently dimensioned to include the sidewalk area. Please revise. 21. Per UDC table 7.4.6-2: Two-way PAAL within a Storage Use development must have a minimum width of 30 feet. The PAAL at the southwest corner of the building and within the parking area does not meet the minimum required width. Please revise. 22. Per UDC table 7.4.6-1: Parking spaces must be 18.0 feet deep minimum. Please revise the large parking spaces to comply with this requirement. 23. Clearly label extents of proposed curbs on site. It is not clear from the site plan where new curbs are proposed. 24. Provide standard plan reference for driveway construction. 25. Per UDC table 7.4.6-2: Two-way PAAL within a Storage Use development must have a minimum width of 30 feet. The driveway does not meet the minimum required width. Please revise. 26. Per Technical Standards Manual section 7-01.4.2: Sidewalks associated with PAALs must be physically separated from any vehicular travel lane by means of curbing, grade separation (minimum six inches), barriers, railings, or other means, except at designated crosswalks. Please revise. 27. Show pedestrian access points to the building. 28. Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. 29. Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. Sheet 5 30. Provide labels on all major contour lines. 31. Show and label 100-year flood limits and water surface elevations for >100cfs flows. 32. Provide slope callouts with arrows for all sidewalk and pedestrian areas. 33. Provide the height of the Self Storage building. 34. Please identify FG of lot in addition to FFE. 35. Please locate basin inlet on plan. Please add basin top, bottom, water depth, side slope ratio, top width of basin and show how top of basin elevations connect to surrounding contours. 36. Proposed contours do not appear to be connecting to existing on north side of site, please revise. 37. Please identify what the large parking space area is. Additionally, does the adjacent sidewalk/pavement have a curb? 38. Please provide additional drainage information on the parking median area. Currently not proposing drainage measures. If harvest area, please identify and add basin info. 39. Please identify traffic circulation and connection points to public streets. 40. Please identify the purpose of proposed concrete on south end of site. Indicate whether it is curbed or flushed. 41. Please identify if sidewalk is curbed or flush. Provide sections. 42. Identify outer dashed boundary line, add to legend. 43. Identify all on/off site drainage discharge and acceptance points. Sheet 6 44. Show project area on site plan. 45. Show all existing utility lines including existing sewer and water that is shown on sheet 7. Provide information on location, size of pipes and invert and rim elevation of all manholes and cleanouts. 46. Label all existing electrical poles, boxes and street lights associated with the existing overhead electrical lines around the project site. Sheet 7 47. Differentiate between existing and proposed site improvements. 48. Unclear what the dimensions along the north of the viewport related to as they do not appear to be dimensioned to any feature in particular. Please revise. 49. Provide reference to standard details for water and sewer connections to existing main lines. Drainage Report Comments: 1. Figure 5 - Provide contour elevation labels. 2. Appendices - Provide HEC-RAS cross-section plots and WSEL profile. 3. Calculations - The HEC-RAS model need to extend north of Los Reales Road and add the additional 91 cfs where appropriate to show how flow crosses the road and that it does not breakout into the project site. 4. Figure 6 - Show same contours as Figure 5 and label. 5. Figure 6 - Include regulatory floodplain and account for offsite flows going into Basin RV 3. 6. Figure 6 - Clearly show watershed boundaries, which basin they drain to and label Los Reales Road. This figure is very hard to interpret. 7. Figure 14 - Add figure number. 8. Figure 14 - Include regulatory floodplain and re-delineate ON-1 to account for development and flows going in or around Basin RV-3. 9. Figure 14 - Clearly show watershed boundaries and flow arrows to indicate areas draining to Basin SS-1. Figure is quite hard to decipher. 10. Figure 14 - Basin SS-1 inflow/outflow data is not correct and needs to correlate with the calculations. 11. Figure 14 - Splash pads do not line up with pipe outlets in some cases. 12. Page 20 (Report) - The routing schematic shows basins RV-1 and RV-3 draining to Basin RV-2. Describe how this will be accomplished. The grading plan indicates slope around the site drain to the west towards Basin SS-1. 13. Page 20 (Report), Plan Sheet 5 - Check assumption SS-2 drains to Basin RIV-2 based on grading plan. How is retained flow in SS-2 in excess of infiltration capacity conveyed to Basin RIV 2? It appears to be a low area. 14. Address why Basin SS-1 does not outlet along Los Reales Road per existing conditions. Currently appears to outlet at existing inlet in Los Reales Road ROW. 15. Figure 6 (Report), Plan Sheet 5 - Show existing inlet and storm drain system along Los Reales Road west of CP ON-1. 16. Plan Sheet 5 - Show Basin SS-1 outlet. 17. Report - Address existing inlet and storm drain in Los Reales Road ROW. Review and Comments provided by third party engineer reviewers under contract with the City of Tucson. For Questions or Concerns contact: Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/22/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Wilmot Self Storage – 6131 E Benson Hwy Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0189 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 22, 2022 DUE DATE: September 2, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is July 10, 2023. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0189, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4 – Remove the subdivision case numbers from the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.3 – Provide the rezoning, C9-21-05, conditions on the plan. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – There are several easements on sheet 3 shown to be “ABANDONED BY FINAL PLAT”. Zoning was not able to find a final plat associated with this site. These easements will need to be abandoned prior to approval of the DP. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C - Provide the following information for Los Reales Rd, right-of-way width, dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – There is a “20.0’ ONE-WAY PAAL” called out along the north and east side of the building that encroaches into the 6’-0” sidewalk called out under keynote 5. The “PAAL” designation is not correct as no parking is being accessed along these areas ad it should be labeled as an access lane. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – There are “PAAL”s called out throughout the site that are not providing access to parking spaces and should be labeled access lanes. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Along the southeast side of this project there appears to be vehicle access proposed to what appears to be some type of development. Clarify what is happening along in this area. If this area is proposed development provide the DP case number. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.b are met for what appears to be fencing along the north, east, west and south side of the site. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking spaces required number is not correct. Per UDC TABLE 7.4.4-1: MINIMUM NUMBER OF MOTOR VEHICLE SPACES REQUIRED, STORAGE USE GROUP, Personal Storage, 2 spaces for any associated office are required. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide the number of accessible, required & provided, within the vehicle parking calculation along with the number of van accessible, required & provided. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The short-term bicycle parking detail does not address UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.e, or 7.4.9.B.2.f. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Provide the required sidewalk out to Los Reales Rd, TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A. 16. COMMENT: – Clarify what the item is that is shown southeast of the trash enclosure. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 08/29/2022 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | See the letter in the DOCUMENTS section of PRO: "Tucson Electric Power, letter of approval, 08.16.22" |
| 08/31/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 09/12/2022 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approved | Approved. View in the DOCUMENTS section of PRO - "TAA letter of approval, 09.06.22" |
| 09/13/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Wilmot Self Storage ACTIVITY NO: DP22-0189 Address: Zoning: C-2 Existing Use: partially graded land, vacant Proposed Use: Self Storage TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 13, 2022 DUE DATE: September 2, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 1. If using d.g. at 2” depth, make sure that the water harvesting basins are 8” deep to allow for d.g. depth. Make sure that grading, water harvesting and landscape plans match, as well as details. 2. Clearly identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on grading and water harvesting plans. 3. Please add a detail to show depressed landscape areas or indicate with notes. 4. Ensure that the trees in the parking area are placed to maximize shade on the asphalt. Placing trees along the edge of a parking area or at the ends of parking row does not meet the intent of the UDC. All spaces within 40’ of a tree is only one of the requirements, and it is required to meet all. The intent is to provide as much shade on the asphalt as possible, and the requirement is 1 tree per 4 parking spaces; trees are expected to be placed within the parking area itself to mitigate the heat and glare radiated by the built environment, UDC 7.6.1.A.3. Trees are to be distributed evenly throughout the parking area, UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a., UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2 5. The monitor is responsible for an assessment of the condition of the site’s plants one year after the final inspection has been performed on the site. The monitor shall visit the site and prepare a report on plant status, including general plant condition, the identification of plants under stress and the appropriate method to relieve the stress, and recommendations for replacement of plants that are dead or dying. Dead or dying plants must be replaced with the same size plant at a one-to-one ratio of like genus and species. Copies of the report must be submitted to the site owner/developer and to PDSD. The owner must respond to the plant needs as outlined in the status report within six months of report submittal or within a shorter period if required to improve the health of stressed plants and prevent plant loss. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/21/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | email from: COTDSDPermits To: Erin Harris cc: Jason Shinn 09/21/2022 REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP22-0189 Site/Grading/Swppp - Wilmot Self Storage. 6050 E LOS REALES RD FEE BALANCE: $ 1,940.38 ONLINE PAYMENTS ** If the online amount doesn't match "Fee Balance" above, check again in a few hours ** https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this blank 4- "Continue" 5- In the Pay column - check the boxes YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on the blue tab - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. Title your SECOND submittal documents accordingly, example: 2_Comment Response Letter 3. UPLOAD documents to Filedrop: - Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) - Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) - Documents requested by review staff FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - "Existing Application" - "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff) Sharon Beasley, Certified Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning & Development Services Dept. Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (for development packages, land splits, Thursday Presubmittal meetings) Email: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov (for building permits) |
| 09/21/2022 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | Plans show two different heights, 22' on sheet 1 & 36' on 4. Please correct the height. Plans shall show that the building is compliant with the 2018 IFC, Appendix D, Section D104.1, D105.1-D105.4 Plans shall show the location of the FDC's If a fire sprinkler system is required the F.D.C. shall be located on the street side in compliance with IFC 2018, Chapter 9, Section 912.2.1 Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033 Fire Plans Examiner Tucson Fire Department |