Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP22-0178
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/13/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/18/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Development Package Comments: Sheet 1 1. Please provide areas in both square feet and acres on General Note #5. 2. Provide the name, address, and phone number of the firm who prepared the geotechnical report. 3. Provide 3"x5" box at the lower right quadrant of each sheet for approval stamp. 4. Provide name and contact information of engineering firm. Sheet 4 5. Riprap on both sides of the basin will block access to maintenance the existing power pole to remain in the middle of the eastern basin. Please revise plan as necessary. Sheet 5 6. Please provide additional spot slopes for surface flow to ensure there is no ponding water. 7. Please call out slope ratio on basins and evaluate if fencing of basin is necessary. 8. Please call out Section I on Sheet 6. Sheet 6 9. Please call out basin material & thickness in Section I. 10. Please reference on sheet 5 where details are used. 11. Provide depth, WSEL, and bottom width of basin in Section I. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Comments: Sheet 1 1. Please label bearings and distances o the project property lines. 2. Please identify the approximate stockpile location. 3. Please label APN/Owner for surrounding properties. 4. Please label basin volume, flow rate, top/bottom elevation for all proposed basins. Drainage Report Comments: 1. Krueger Wash Floodplain - Please provide calculations for the erosion hazard setback and show the proposed substation improvements are outside of those limits. 2. The City of Tucson considers the proposed substation a critical facility and therefore an evaluation of the 500-year floodplain must be provided and equipment elevated above the 500-year WSELs. Please revise report to include 500-year analysis. Please also provide an explanation for the use of the 3-hour storm event instead of the typical 1-hour storm event used for watersheds of this size. Note that a 1-hour storm may result in larger peak flow rates, floodplain limits and water surface elevations. 3. Proposed Drainage Plan 3rd Paragraph - Please discuss the dimensions of the wall openings and provide calculations of the peak discharges through the wall opening. 4. Proposed Drainage Conditions 5th paragraph - Please clarify "D2.3" in the last sentence of 5th paragraph. 5. Please provide a discussion and analysis on the First Flush volume per Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Section 2.2 and the City of Tucson Code of Ordinances. 6. Figure 2 Existing Conditions Drainage Map - Please provide contours with labels for offsite and onsite properties. 7. Figure 2 - Please provide full extents of the 100-year floodplain limits as well as WSELs. Please also include a discussion in the text and calculations for this floodplain delineation. 8. Figure 1 Proposed Conditions Drainage Map - Please add cyan hatching for the proposed basin into the legend. Please consider increasing the contour interval for the basin on the east side so the basin bottom and top elevation is clear. 9. Figure 1 - Proposed Conditions Drainage Map - Please provide labels for the offsite contours. 10. Figure 1 - Proposed Conditions Drainage Map - Please show the boundary between watersheds D1, D3, and D5. Review and Comments provided by third party engineer reviewers under contract with the City of Tucson. For Questions or Concerns contact: Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/21/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: TEP Demoss Petrie 230kV Substation Development Package (1st Review) DP22-0178 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 21, 2022 DUE DATE: July 27, 2022 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings and a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is June 30, 2023. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0178, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Per UDC TABLE 7.4.4-1: MINIMUM NUMBER OF MOTOR VEHICLE SPACES REQUIRED, UTILITIES USE GROUP minimum of 2 vehicle parking spaces are required for this facility. Provide a vehicle parking space calculation and show the required parking spaces on the plan along with dust control for the spaces and access to them. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The “WEST (STREET, FRONT)” setback listed under General Note 13 is not correct. Per UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 & Table 6.4.5.C-1 the street perimeter yard setback is 21’ or H = The height of the proposed exterior building wall, greater of the two as measured from the back of future curb. Show the future curb and provide a perimeter yard setback from the 10’-0” wall, called out under Keynote 10 to the back of future curb. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 07/28/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 08/02/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: TEP Demoss Retrie 230kV Substation ACTIVITY NO: DP22-0178 Address/Parcel: 107-07-014A Zoning: I-1 Existing Use: disturbed, vacant land Proposed Use: Utility distribution TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 2, 2022 DUE DATE: July 27, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 1. UDC Technical Standards Manual – Section 4-01.0.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening. Demonstrate how water harvesting is being maximized. 2. Engineer & LA comment - Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. First flush volumes should be directed to landscape areas. https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-manual-board-version-201511.pdf COT edits - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Detention_Retention_Manual_Tech_Standards_Amemdments.pdf 3. Engineer & LA comment - The table in the PCRFCD Manuel can be used in lieu of the Water Budget Table, the only thing that is missing is water demand for plants, which can be added. Make sure units match. 4. Engineer Comment - The grading plan and water harvesting plan do not meet the requirements of the water harvesting ordinance and technical standard. The plan doesn't show the effective use of run-off to supplement irrigation. The grade is directing most water to the retention basins and the driveway a. The catchment areas must provide water to the infiltration areas. Revise the grading to direct runoff to the landscape infiltration areas to the maximum extent possible. b. Catchment areas in the water harvesting table can only count the areas that are directed to the landscape infiltration areas. c. Clearly show the areas in each catchment area and the areas of effective infiltration and water harvesting. All landscape areas should be included within infiltration areas. d. UDC section 7.6.6.C requires the use of all runoff to supplement irrigation. Show how this is attained. e. The landscape, water harvesting, and grading plans must match. 6. Identify curb inlets/splash pads/ wall openings to landscape areas on grading and water harvesting plans. 7. The Retention/detention basins is not identified on the landscape plan, and there are PIP trees shown in the area. Please revise. 8. Hydroseed is shown along the east retention basin, except that there is grouted riprap. Please revise. 9. Tree 18 is shown as PIP, in the middle of grouted rip rap, please clarify. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/15/2022 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/26/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | email from: COTDSDPermits to: lisa bowers 08/26/2022 REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP22-0178 Site/Grading/Swppp - Tucson Electric Power Company. New substation. Fee Balance: $0 (zero) YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. Title your SECOND submittal documents accordingly, example: 2_Comment Response Letter 3. UPLOAD documents to Filedrop: - Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) - Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) - Any other documents requested by review staff FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - "Existing Application" - "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff) Sharon Beasley, Certified Permit Technician City of Tucson, Planning & Development Services Dept. Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (for development packages, land splits, Thursday Presubmittal meetings) Email: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov (for building permits) |
| 08/26/2022 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | Passed | Email from: Nicholas Jordan To: CDRC 08/23/2022 Please remove Pima County Addressing from this project as it does not require review. Thank you Nicholas Jordan Site Review Project Manager - Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 |