Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: DP22-0175
Parcel: 12405049A

Review Status: Active

Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - DP22-0175
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Active
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/21/2022 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
09/21/2022 ANY LANDSCAPE REVIEW Active
09/22/2022 MGAYOSS1 DESIGN PROFESSIONAL REVIEW Approved DATE: September 22, 2022
FROM: Rick Gonzalez, Architect (#26992)
COT On-Call Design Professional
RE: MGD Development Package Review, MGD-15-01 (T15SA00073),
876 E University Blvd. DP22-0175

I have completed a Review of the Development Package for 876 E University Blvd resubmitted in September 2022 for the purpose of determining its conformance with the Design Requirements of the MGD Ordinance 11394. I have checked the submittal against Section C-19.

1. Lighting: minimize light glare and trespass, conserve energy, promote safety and security, full cut-off fixtures,
concealed from public right-of-way view. -- N/A to modification

2. Building Materials and Colors: chosen for tactile effects, contrast... like rough to smooth, vertical patterns vs. horizontal. Etc., integral colors, visual and physical permanence in the Sonoran Desert. Localizing effect, ambiance, coherence with the neighborhood. Facades on public streets or open space: Use high quality materials such as: brick, stone, pre-cast concrete, cast stone, CMU's. Brick panels... Architectural metals... panels, sheets... with expressed seams, cuts, stamps, casts, or ornamental panels. Glass/glass block... Modular panels: EIFS, stucco, but less than 25% of total facade at the base along public streets. At lower floors adjacent to street frontage, respond to pedestrian ways... using quality scale, texture color, detail. Material combinations reinforce architectural scaling requirements. Reflects tradition of U of A, COT, adjacent historic neighborhoods. Use accent colors consistently throughout: signs, architectural features, lighting, window/door frames, and accent walls. Avoid glare reflective producing materials. -- Conforms to the approved Design Package.

3. Architectural Elements and Features: Balconies, outdoor stairs, ornaments and surface details the approved such as screening, cladding and fenestration shall be Design Package provided to enhance the architectural style of the
building. No balconies allowed in group dwellings. Consider appropriate use, scale, proportion, texture Carefully integrate in the concept design. Clear visual distinction between the ground and upper floors. Arcades, when used, place along south and west facades, unless along Park Avenue. Construct out of wood, brick, canvas, metal, stone or concrete. Street facing facades: 20' maximum single plane without architectural detailing. Outdoor vending and gathering areas encouraged. Delineate with hardscape, grade change, or vegetation. -- Conforms to the approved Design Package.

4. Building Articulation: 3 consecutive street facing facade areas: same paint or method of articulation. Articulate facades at entries between retail spaces for patio and outside engagement. Building long than 85' – articulate each 85' to appear as separate buildings along a front property line. Building corners – add articulation to emphasize and promote gathering (e.g. roof/facade higher at corner).
Local public art encouraged (e.g. sculpture art). -- N/A to Modification.

5. Doors. shade and w. eather protection at entries, clear
identification, safe, secure, universally accessible. Storefronts – provide awnings, canopies for shade, color, and material variation; integrate with sidewalk
design and treatment. Clearly identifiable “front door” at each facade on a major street. Residential Units - provide separate street access, residential scale, demarcated by awning, stoop or recess. -- N/A

6. Windows and Glazing: low e, visual connection through either side. Size, proportion, pattern relates to unit type/layout. Reinforces facade patterns of scale and variety.
property and the proposed use(s). Mixed usesuses a variety of ratios of clear to opaque surfaces (i.e. glass to wall) and on commercial greater glass to wall. -- N/A

7. Building Facades: Base to have at least two of the following... the approved trellis or vertical garden with 50% vegetation. Local artist Artwork (e,g, public mural, custom
panel, small retail space (50 sf plus GFA, coffee cart, kiosk, etc.). Outdoor dining, gathering patio, delineated by low wall, fence, planter, change of elevation, or other buffers. Distinctive Lighting. Shade structure, changes of plane such as indentations, textures, or accent materials. Windows – 75% minimum visible light on each side of window. Window displays or visible activity on ground floor. -- Conforms to the approved Design Package.

8. Streetscape: along Speedway and Euclid Avenue, design to promote community. -- N/A

General Comments:
1. I Recommend Approval as noted in the above review and the documents indicated below. This review is based on a Development Package Review of the proposed project as shown in the Revision 2 September, 2022 development package: approved Design Package and Decision
Notice, I recommend to the Planning Director, approval of this revised Development Package.

Sincerely,
Rick Gonzalez,
Architect (RGA)
10/04/2022 JPEELDA1 FIRE REVIEW Approved
10/13/2022 FRANK PODGORSKI HPZ ADVISORY BOARD HPZ ADVISORY BOARD DATE Active
10/13/2022 ANY ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Active
10/17/2022 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Approved
10/18/2022 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed