Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP22-0175
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/21/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/21/2022 | FRANK PODGORSKI | HPZ ADVISORY BOARD | HPZ ADVISORY BOARD DATE | Needs Review | The site at 876 E University is a contributing resource to the West University National Register Historic District. The site is not within the historic preservation zone, but within the Main Gate District. The project will need to be reviewed by the Tucson Pima County Historical Commission Plans Review Subcommittee. Historic staff is concerned that the addition of the shades blocks the views of the historic resource. Staff is particularly concerned with the shade structure on the second floor. |
| 07/21/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed | The engineering review was passed by Mr. Loren Makus during the OK to Submit preview (review not required). |
| 07/21/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Illegal Pete’s – 2 Canopies & ADA Lift Addition Development Package (1st Review) DP22-0175 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 21, 2022 DUE DATE: July 27, 2022 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings and a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is June 28, 2023. 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.2.4 – Per Loran Shamis email 06/20/2022 “Include only the sheets that will be modified relevant to this proposal. Sheet 2 & sheets 4-16 are sheets from DP15-0033 with the old approval stamps and it doesn’t appear that there is any new work proposed on these sheets. There are numerous keynotes on sheet 3 that reference “NEW” but these items were constructed under DP15-0033, clarify what you are doing. Sheet 1 & 3 reference “NEW BUILDING EXPANSION” & “PROPOSED 3-STORY ADDITION” which is already built. Modify these plans to clearly show what is proposed under this DP. Additional comments maybe forth coming. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – Depending on how comment 1 is addressed the sheet index may need to be modified. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide the email address for the Architect & Landscape Architect listed on sheet 1 or if not applicable remove them from the plan. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – Depending on how comment 1 is addressed the page number and the total number of pages in the package may need to be modified. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0175, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – Design Review and Historic review will be required for this project. If approved provide the case numbers adjacent to the title block on all sheets and provide a general note stating the case number, date of approval, what if anything is modified and any conditions of approval. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 07/28/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Verify that no fixtures located above the rim elevation of the next upstream manhole discharge through the backwater valve (e.g. any floor 2418.75' or higher). Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 201. |
| 08/04/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PROJECT: Illegal Pete’s ACTIVITY NO: DP22 Address: 876 E university Blvd Zoning: Existing Use: Food Service Proposed Use: Food Service TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 4, 2022 DUE DATE: July 27, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 1. Remove CoT approvals from 2015. Remove all LUC references and replace with UDC references. 2. A Commercial Rainwater Harvesting plan is required. UDC Technical Standards Manual – Section 4-01.0.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening. Demonstrate how water harvesting is being maximized. Recognizing this is an existing development and water harvesting opportunities are limited, show how water harvesting is maximized on the grading and landscape plan. 3. Engineer & LA comment - The table in the PCRFCD Manuel can be used in lieu of the Water Budget Table, the only thing that is missing is water demand for plants, which can be added. Make sure units match. 4. The grading plan and water harvesting plan do not meet the requirements of the water harvesting ordinance and technical standard. The plan doesn't show the effective use of run-off to supplement irrigation. 5. UDC section 7.6.6.C requires the use of all runoff to supplement irrigation. Show . how this is attained. 6. Water harvesting areas should be depressed between 6 and 9 inches. These areas can be counted toward first flush retention requirements. 7. The landscape, water harvesting, and grading plans must match. 8. Identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on grading and water harvesting plans.Please add a detail to show depressed landscape areas or indicate with notes. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/15/2022 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | We need more information regarding exiting and stairwells to the 3rd floor. Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033 Fire Plans Examiner |
| 09/09/2022 | MGAYOSS1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Denied | Design Professional and Historic Preservation Officer will be reviewing the resubmittal of the Development Package against the Design Package approved on 9/9/2022 under T15SA00073. |
| 09/13/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | email from: COTDSDPermits to: lisa bowers 09/13/22 Returned for Corrections: DP22-0175 Site/Main Gate District/Historic zoning -:Illegal Pete's. Addition of canopies and ADA lift. Fee Balance: $0 (zero) YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on the blue tab - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. Title your SECOND submittal documents accordingly, example: 2_Comment Response Letter 3. UPLOAD documents to Filedrop: - Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) - Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) - Documents requested by review staff FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - "Existing Application" - "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff) Sharon Beasley Certified Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning & Development Services Dept. Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (for development packages, land splits, Thursday Presubmittal meetings) Email: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov (for building permits) |