Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP22-0167
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/18/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/24/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Salad & Go – 7980 E Speedway Blvd Development Package (1st Review) DP22-0167 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 24, 2022 DUE DATE: September 6, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is August 17, 2023. 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.2.4 – Remove all building code references, i.e., “CONSTRUCTION TYP”, “OCCUPANCY TYPE”, “FIRE SPRINKLER” & “FIRE ALARM” from the “SITE AREA CALCUALTIONS” table as review for these items will not occur during the DP review. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide the name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, and the email addresses, and phone number developer of the project. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.A – Provide a brief legal description within the title block. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0167, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three-inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – Labe; the section, township, and range; section corners: and the scale on the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.2 – As a general note list the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage. This will include the entire shopping center, see AM Section 2-06.4.7.A.8.d. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The Use Specific Standards listed under General Note 2 are not correct. Review UDC TABLE 4.8-4: PERMITTED USES - COMMERCIAL AND MIXED-USE ZONES, C-1 Zone, Food Service: Excluding Soup Kitchens and provide the correct standards. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As Speedway Blvd is designated as an Arterial on the COT MS&R Map provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R).” 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Remove all references to “LOT COVERAGE” & “SITE COVERAGE” from the plan as lot coverage is not applicable to this zone/use. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – Provide a building expansion calculation on the plan. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met. This includes vehicle, bicycle parking etc. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide the following for Speedway Blvd, pavement width, sidewalk width, sidewalk and curb location dimensions. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A – It appears that some type of lot split/subdivision is proposed. As the original parcel was created via a final plat the number of divisions has exceeded the allowed per UDC Article 11.4.20 definition of Subdivision C. Any property whose boundaries are fixed by a recorded plat, which is divided into more than two parts. A block plat will be required and must be submitted and approved prior to approval of this DP. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide a width dimension from the sidewalk area along the west side of the proposed building, west, to the landscape island: from the west end of the dual roll curb shown south of the proposed building, west, to the landscape island: from the curb called out east of the proposed building, east to the existing curb shown on the plan. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.a.(2) are met. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation is not correct and should include the entire site, see comment 12. Also, the vehicle parking requirement does not exclude coolers or restrooms, vehicle parking is based on Gross Floor Area for this use, see UDC Article 7.4.3.F.4. If you are going to use the shopping center calculation provide a break down of all uses and clearly demonstrate on the plan that the definition of a shopping center is met, see UDC Article 11.3.9.C.3. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation shall include the number accessible vehicle parking space, required & provided for the entire site, along with the number of required & provided van accessible spaces for the entire site, see comment 12. 21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The bicycle parking space calculation is not correct. Review UDC Table 7.4.8-1: Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces, COMMERCIAL USE GROUP, Food Service and revise the calculation. The number provide is not correct per UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.d A single rack is designed and located to accommodate two bicycles. 22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Sheet 6 under “BICK RACK NOTES” #4 you list the distance of 2’-0” to walls and obstruction, this is not correct. Review UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.g and provide the correct dimension. 23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Sheet 6 “BICK RACK DETAILS” does not addressed UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.e & 7.4.9.B.f. 24. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed show the future curb and sidewalk based on the COT MS&R Plan street cross sections. 25. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – As s Speedway Blvd is designated as an Arterial on the COT MS&R Map based on the definition of Established Area Setback, see UDC Article 11.4.6, this site does not qualify for established area setbacks and is required to meet the requirements of UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 and Table 6.4.5.C-1. Once the future curb location is shown provide a developing area street perimeter yard setback from the back of future curb to the building. The “20’-0” FRONT SETBACK” shown on the plan is not correct. 26. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the height and use within the footprint of the proposed building. 27. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – The “MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT” listed under “SITE AREA CALCULATIONS” is not correct. Review UDC TABLE 6.3-4.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE C-1, C-2, C-3, OCR-1, & OCR-2 ZONES, C-1 Zone and provide the correct allowed height. 28. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.3.3.B & 7-01.4.1 a accessible sidewalk/pedestrian circulation is required from the proposed building to the buildings to the south. 29. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – The 5’ crosswalk shown running west from the proposed building to the center of the PAAL is a safety issue. Crosswalk should run perpendicular to the PAALs or Access lanes. 30. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Clearly demonstrate on the plan that the requirements of ICC A117.1-2009 Section 406 are met to include but not limited to, slopes width, etc., are met for the existing ramp shown north of the proposed accessible parking space. 31. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R - Provide width dimensions for all sidewalks show around the proposed building. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 08/25/2022 | JVINCEN1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/31/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 09/13/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Salad and Go ACTIVITY NO: DP22-0167 Address: 7980 E Speedway Blvd Zoning: C-1/C-2 Existing Use: vacant pad Proposed Use: Fast food TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 13, 2022 DUE DATE: September 6, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. An engineer is not the appropriate professional to prepare landscape and irrigation plans. 1. Demonstrate how water harvesting is maximized. UDC Technical Standards Manual – Section 4-01.0.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening. Demonstrate how water harvesting is being maximized. 2. If using d.g. at 2” depth, make sure that the water harvesting basins are 8” deep to allow for d.g. depth. Make sure that grading, water harvesting and landscape plans match, as well as details. 3. The landscape, water harvesting, and grading plans must match. 4. Identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on grading and water harvesting plans. 5. Please add a detail to show depressed landscape areas or indicate with notes. 6. Please provide all landscape calculations on the landscape plan, including required trees for the parking areas, Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.A.2.c and landscape borders, UDC Technical Standards 2-10.4.2.f & g. 7. Please label the existing and future rights of way for all public streets, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 8. Please label the separate irrigation meter “irrigation only”. UDC Technical Standards 4-01.6.1.A.1. 9. Identify the type of irrigation controller with soil moisture gauge, tensiometer, weather station and/or evaportranspiration data. UDC Tech Standards 4-01.4.A. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/16/2022 | LEVANS2 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. For the trash enclosure include details complying with TSM Section 8-01. 2. There must be a pedestrian path to the trash enclosure. Show a complete pedestrian circulation path to the rest of the shopping center to the south. Adjust the pedestrian circulation path to the disability accessible parking space so that it is not parallel the adjacent parking and access lane. 3. Show dimension from the north side of the structure to the proposed drive through vehicular area. Must be one foot or greater per UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2a. 4. Must show spot grades, flow lines, and proposed contours sufficient to understand the drainage path of stormwater in the drive through and parking areas. Show roof drainage paths and downspouts. 5. The landscaping details must show six-inch planting depression for water harvesting. The design should include curb cuts or scuppers that allow drainage to enter the landscaped areas to maximize water harvesting. 6. Include grading cut and fill quantities for permitting purposes. 7. Requires location map compliant with 2-06.4.4 of the Administrative Code. Include name, email, addresses, and phone numbers of owner and developer. Lianne Evans lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/20/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | email from: COTDSDPermits To: Augustin P. 09/20/2022 Returned for Corrections: DP22-0167 Site - Salad and Go. Restaurant with carry out facility. No interior or exterior eating/drinking facilities available on this project site. Fully Sprinklered, one story, approx. 828 sf. gross, with two canopies, walk-up=184sf, drive-through=113 sf, total covered area shall be 1,125 sf. 4 parking stalls provided, one of which is Van-Accessible. 7980 E SPEEDWAY BL Fee Balance: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on the blue tab - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. Title your SECOND submittal documents accordingly, example: 2_Comment Response Letter 3. UPLOAD documents to Filedrop: - Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) - Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) - Documents requested by review staff FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - "Existing Application" - "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff) Sharon Beasley, Certified Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning & Development Services Dept. Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (for development packages, land splits, Thursday Presubmittal meetings) Email: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov (for building permits) |