Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP22-0153
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/30/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/30/2022 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 06/30/2022 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 06/30/2022 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 07/18/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Development Plan / Tentative Plat Comments: Sheet 1 1. Please add the administrative street address to the title block, all sheets. 2. Please add an additional 3"x5" approval block space adjacent to this on the cover sheet only. (Cover sheet needs 2 approval blocks) 3. Please add common areas and types to project title and denote public street names. 4. Please match all line types and symbols between the legend and the plan set (water, sewer, overhead power, APN, etc.). Please show all symbols used (driveway, scupper, curb ramp. etc.). 5. Please add the address of the developer and owner. 6. Please add an email address for the owner. 7. Please add adjacent parcel information on the project layout. 8. Please add the following note to the general notes: "Any wastewater discharged into the public sanitary sewerage system shall meet the requirements of Pima County Ordinance No. 1991-140, as currently amended." 9. Please include COT field book number and page for Datum. 10. Please add the dates of the soils engineering and engineering geology reports together with the names, addresses and phone numbers of the firms or individuals who prepared the reports on the cover sheet. Sheet 2 11. Please correctly reference details - "Details 1 Sheet 3". 12. Verify that keynote 6 location is actually a join existing curb. Keynote 7 to the south of 6 states to replace curb. Please relocate keynote 6 to the location where curb replacement ends. 13. Curb ramp is not needed at keynote location 8. The proposed sidewalk may join existing. 14. Please label length of transition curb from 6" to 0" adjacent to keynote 4. 15. Please label TC and FL at each driveway to show substantial drainage patterns. 16. Please label FS elevations and slope arrows within parking areas. Demonstrate how flows are routed towards the detention basins prior to entering the street. 17. Is there an existing fence on site? Show all existing conditions and appropriately label for removal or retained. 18. There is a property line running within the Lot 5 pad. Please clarify, buildings cannot be placed on top of property lines. 19. Some existing power poles appear to be in conflict with proposed improvements. Please label each power pole as remove, retain, or relocate. Reference dry utility plans if applicable. 20. Show accessible parking spaces per ADA requirements. 21. Please label 100-yr ponding limit in detention ponds. 22. Use proposed flow arrows and flow lines to demonstrate on-site drainage patterns. If applicable, provide a detail showing lot drainage patterns. 2% min drainage slope away from buildings. 23. Please label height of residential duplex in section view. 24. Please show and label location and orientation of cross-section in plan view. 25. Show refuse collection areas if dumpsters are proposed. 26. Indicate location of gang mailboxes, if applicable. 27. Label grades on slopes within detention basins. 2:1 max, and in conformance with project geotechnical report. 28. The top of slopes (within detention basins) must have a min. 2' offset from the ROW/PL. Please revise (typ). 29. Please provide detail for 6' high screening wall. Label offset from PL to ensure foundations do not encroach neighboring properties. 30. Please avoid text overwrites throughout set. 31. Please provide elevations of outlet channels for each detention basin. Sheet 3 32. Add missing keynote label for water lateral servicing Lot 5 and sewer laterals servicing Lots 5, and 7. 33. Sewer lateral servicing lot 3 is mislabeled - please revise keynote. 34. 6" curb is proposed on top of an existing sewer manhole. Revise design as necessary. 35. There does not appear to be existing fire hydrants nearby. Coordinate with the fire department regarding the need for proposed hydrants. 36. Please add TC and Pavement grades to all drives. 37. Please add pavement elevations at all corners of driveways, show how drainage either gets to basins or across driveways, and show how basins drain to scuppers without backing up to pad elev. 38. Identify structure symbol "W" appearing on S Fontana Avenue. 39. Please identify circled A symbol appearing on back of Lot 2. 40. Call-out curb removal and pavement sawcut/replacement, typical all driveways. Sheet 5 41. Please locate the north arrow and scale in the upper right-hand corner of each sheet (sheet 5 and 6). Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Comments: Sheet 2 1. Please label locations for on-site material, waste, borrow areas, or equipment storage areas, and other supporting activities. 2. Show and label locations of detention basin outlets. Use existing flow arrows to show direction of flows after discharging the site. 3. Please provide detail of construction entrance or provide more information on gravel type and thickness. Drainage Report Comments: 1. Section 2.1.2 - Onsite Hydrology -Please provide adequate discussion of the analysis per COT SDDFM Section 2.3.1. 2. Section 2.1.1 - Offsite Hydrology - Please verify the flow rate along Drexel Road, provide a floodplain analysis to depict how the site may be impacted by its flows and how the development impacts the floodplain. Please also note that analysis of spread within the new curbed pavement sections for the 10-year and 100-year events may be required. 3. Section 2.1.2 Offsite Hydrology - Contours shown on report exhibits indicate offsite areas flow onto the proposed project site. Please provide a discussion and calculations as necessary to demonstrate no impact to adjacent parcels. 4. General Comment - Per City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management Section 2.1.1, all projects greater than 1 acre must submit a drainage report. Please revise the report to include the formatting, information/discussion and calculations required of a drainage report per section 2.3.1, specifically including detention/retention and floodplain mapping which are not sufficiently discussed and or provided herein. 5. Section 2.2.2 - Please add statement describing if the project site is in a balanced or critical basin and how that impacts the required detention retention. Please provide water surface elevations for each basin and available freeboard. Note that FFEs are required to be above the basin WSELs. Please provide impervious areas and required volumes used to calculate the first flush volume shown. 6. Existing Onsite Drainage Map - Please label the street wash. 7. Onsite Drainage Map - Please provide a column with the impervious and disturbed areas used to determine first flush volumes. 8. Onsite Drainage Map - Please label all drainage features and provide floodplain and basin water surface elevations. Review and Comments provided by third party engineer reviewers under contract with the City of Tucson. For Questions or Concerns contact: Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/25/2022 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | Email from: Howard Dutt To: CDRC Fri 7/22/2022 2:43 PM No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard Dutt, RLA Project Manager/Landscape Architect Parks and Recreation | City of Tucson |
| 07/25/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Drexel Heights, Lots 1-10 Development Package (1st Review) DP22-0153 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 25, 2022 DUE DATE: July 28, 2022 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings and a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is June 08, 2023. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide an email address for the owner listed on sheet 1. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0153, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4 – Remove the subdivision shown on the location map as they are not required. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The proposed use listed under General Note 3 is not correct and should be Duplex. Also review UDC TABLE 4.8-2: PERMITTED USES - URBAN RESIDENTIAL ZONES, R-2 Zone, Duplex Use and provide the applicable Use Specific Standards within General Note 3. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As Drexel is listed as a Collector on the COT MS&R Map provide a general note stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R)”. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – As it does not appear that this subdivision is being developed as a Flexible Lot Development (FLD) site coverage is not applicable, lot coverage will be looked at time at the time of building permitting for each individual lot. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Per UDC Article 7.6.4.B and a Zoning Administrators determination the when more than four vehicle parking spaces are provided the requirements of UDC Articles 7.6.4.B & 7.4.6 apply to the vehicle use area. The following comments apply: 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Per UDC Article 7.4.6.D.1, Table 7.4.6-A, 7.4.6-1 & 7.4.6-2 the minimum two-way Parking Area Access Lane (PAAL) is 24’ wide, the 20’ shown on the plan does not meet these requirements. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Per UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. Demonstrate how parking vehicles will be prevented from accessing unimproved portions of the site. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.J – Cleary dimension the curb and sidewalk location along Drexel Rd. It does not appear that the curb location is correct, review the COT MS&R Plan, located at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/plans/MSR.pdf, and provide curb & sidewalk location dimensions based on the applicable street cross section. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The east street setback is not correct. Per a Zoning Administrators determination when a site boarders on a street designated on the COT MS&R Map all streets that the proposed site will use developing area setbacks. Developing area setbacks shall not be mixed with Established area setbacks. The required street perimeter yard setback to Fontana Ave shall be 21’ or the height as measured from the outside edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 08/01/2022 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Reqs Change | View in DOCUMENTS section of PRO, titled, "TAA review comments, first submittal, 07.28.22" |
| 08/02/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (8936-18F, 2514.32) is more than 12"below the first floor elevation of lot 10 (2515.40). A backwater valve shall not be installed per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. 2. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (8936-17F, 2512.08) is more than 12"below the first floor elevation of lots 3 and 4 (2513.20 and 2513.50). A backwater valve shall not be installed per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 08/05/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Drexel Heights Subdivsion ACTIVITY NO: DP22-0153 Address: 220 E Drexel Rd Zoning: R-2 Existing Use: previously graded, vacant land Proposed Use: multi-family residential TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 4, 2022 DUE DATE: July 28, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 1. Correct landscape calculations on the landscape plan, along Fontana Ave, a 10’ street landscape border is required, Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.A.2.c and landscape borders, UDC Technical Standards 2-10.4.2.f & g. 2. Add additional shrubs/groundcover to mitigate the loss of Fontana landscape border of 2’x1570’= 3470/.5 = 1570 sf of vegetation. The vegetation can be planted along Drexel Rd. 3. Please label the existing and future rights of way for all public streets, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 4. Installing landscape/irrigation in the right of way requires approval from DoT&M, contact david.marhefka@tucsonaz.gov, plans cannot be approved without the department’s consent. Please upload documentation. 5. Please indicate the installation of a private submeter if a separate irrigation meter is not being provided. UDC Technical Standards 4-01.6.1.A.1. 6. Identify the type of irrigation controller with soil moisture gauge, tensiometer, weather station and/or evaportranspiration data. UDC Tech Standards 4-01.4.A. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/12/2022 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | Email from: TEP-DEVREV <TEPDEVREV@tep.com> To: CDRC 08/12/22 TEP has reviewed plans received on June 30th, 2022, the plat for the Tentative Plat - Drexel Heights Subdivision, Lots 1 thru 10, and Common Area "A" subdivision, and has no objections at this time. Costs for removing or relocating existing TEP facilities will be billable to the developer. A Preliminary electrical design is in process. The customer is responsible for compliance with City Ordinances. Please note jurisdictional permit for any work on a public road right of way where applicable. Easements are required for TEP facilities if not appropriately recorded on the final subdivision plat. They will need to be obtained by separate instrument. Tucson Electric Power Co. Land Resources Department |
| 08/15/2022 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | Plans shall show the existing and new hydrants and or fire sprinklers shall be installed. Building shall be within 600' of a hydrant to the furthest part as the hose lays and or fire sprinklers shall be installed IFC 2018, 507.5.1 Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033 Fire Plans Examiner |
| 08/24/2022 | DSTIFFE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 08/31/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | email from: COTDSDPermits To: Peter Salonga 08/31/2022 REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP22-0153 Tentative Plat - Drexel Heights Subdivision, Lots 1 thru 10, and Common Area "A" (landscape, detention basin). 220 E DREXEL RD FEE BALANCE: $ pending No payment due at this time YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. Title your SECOND submittal documents accordingly, example: 2_Comment Response Letter 3. UPLOAD documents to Filedrop: - Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) - Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) - Documents requested by review staff FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - "Existing Application" - "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff) Sharon Beasley, Certified Permit Technician City of Tucson, Planning & Development Services Dept. Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (for development packages, land splits, Thursday Presubmittal meetings) Email: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov (for building permits) |
| 08/31/2022 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | Needs Review |