Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP22-0145
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/15/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/15/2022 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Passed | |
| 06/15/2022 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 06/15/2022 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 06/15/2022 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 06/23/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 06/24/2022 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | Email from: Howard Dutt To: CDRC Fri 6/24/2022 11:45 AM No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard Dutt, RLA Project Manager/Landscape Architect Parks and Recreation | City of Tucson Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov main 520.631.2030 |
| 06/27/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Emerge – Multi-Family Development Package (1st Review) DP22-0 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 27, 2022 DUE DATE: June 27, 2022 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings and a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is May 29, 2023. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.9 - The plan drawing shall be oriented with north toward the top of the sheet. If it is not practical to orient north to the top of the sheet, the plan drawing shall be oriented with north to the left side of the sheet. Sheets 4 & 5, sheets 9-11 and sheets 14-16 do not meet this requirement. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0145, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Review UDC TABLE 4.8-2: PERMITTED USES - URBAN RESIDENTIAL ZONES, R-3 Zone and provide the Use Specific Standards that apply to a multi-family use in the R-3 Zone within General Site Note 9. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 – Per TSM Section 10-01.5.1.A.1 Lines of sight will not be obscured between 30 inches and six feet through a triangular area adjacent to a driveway, a PAAL, an alley, or a street, where such access ways intersect with another street in a T-configuration. The propose trash enclosure and 3 northern most vehicle parking spaces encroach into the SVT’s. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide PAAL and access lane widths for all PAALs and access lanes shown on the plan. Sheet 8 only addressed the width of the eastern most PAAL. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.F.4 are met at the south end of the eastern parking area. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.b are met form the east corner of the trash enclosure to the PAAL. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.a.(1) are met for all covered parking structures shown on the plan. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.F It appears that the location of the wheel stop on detail “B” sheet 7 is not correct. Detail shows 2’ when the requirement is 2’-6”, see UDC Article 7.4.9.H.3. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – The only PAAL width dimension is shown on sheet 8. The dimension is 23’-1” and does not meet the required 24’-0” PAAL width, see UDC Article 7.4.6.D.1, Figure 7.4.6-a and Table 7.4.6-1. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.D.2.b are met for the vehicle parking space directly south of the trash enclosure. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Provide perimeter yard setback dimensions from all buildings to the applicable property line to include the street property line. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – As no heights were provided within the footprint of the buildings as required based on the wall height provided under General Site Note 16, 25’-9” the required perimeter yard setback from the proposed buildings to the south, east and west property lines is 19’-4”, proposed setback to the south property line is 11’-4”, east property line is 10’-0” and to the west property line is 10’-0”. A Design Development Option (DDO) must be submitted and approved to reduce the required setback, DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/DDO_for_Setback_and_Height_UDC_8.11.20.pdf. A DDO is a separate submittal from the building plan and shall be submitted at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd-filedrop, using the Submission Type “Zoning Administration”. If you have questions about the DDO application or process please contact Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the height and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Sections 7-01.3.3.B and 7-01.4.1.D show the required sidewalk to the trash enclosure. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V - Indicate location of the propose mail delivery to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W – If applicable show the location of any proposed signage on the plan. Also provide a general note stating all signs require separate permits. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 07/08/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Emerge ACTIVITY NO: DP22-0145 Address: 6226 E Lee St. Zoning: R-3 Existing Use: Multifamily Proposed Use: Multifamily TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 8, 2022 DUE DATE: June 27, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. General Note - Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 1. The Unified Development Code (UDC) requires all new development or an expansion of less than 25% of an existing development submit a landscape plan, UDC 7.6.2. Preparation of the landscape plan shall adhere to UDC 7.6.4. and Administrative Manual 2-10. 2. The landscape calculations are not correct, an interior border is required along the south property line and the required trees for the landscape border need to be shown. There are two options for street landscape border; place the trees somewhere else on the site, or provide smaller trees to avoid the electric lines, Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.A.2.c and landscape borders, UDC Technical Standards 2-10.4.2.f & g. 3. Please label the existing and future rights of way for all public streets, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 4. Installing landscape/irrigation in the right of way requires approval from DoT&M, contact david.marhefka@tucsonaz.gov, plans cannot be approved without the department's consent. Standard Notes for Planting in ROW It is the owner's responsibility to keep the Sight Visibility Triangles (SVT), and the pedestrian access area clear of vegetation at all times, per Unified Development Code (UDC) Technical Standards Manual Section 10. 1. It is the owner responsibility to keep a 5' wide by 7' tall clear pedestrian access open across the entire property. 2. It is the owner responsible to keep vegetation from growing past the curb line clear and keep a 15' high clear zone over the travel lane. 3. Final plant locations must be in compliance with all utility setback requirements. 4. The owner understands that if the City of Tucson Transportation Department or any utility company needs to work within the ROW in the landscaped area, plants and irrigation may be destroyed without replacement or repair. 5. The owner takes full liability for this landscape and irrigation, and any damage to roadway, sidewalk and utilities. 6. The only private irrigation equipment that is allowed within the ROW are lateral lines, tubing and emitters that are not under constant pressure. All other equipment must be on private property. (excluding water meter) Contractor to obtain a Right Of Way permit prior to construction within the right-of-way. 5. Page 8 conflicts with the landscape plans, please delete landscaping from that page. 6. Please indicate the installation of a private submeter if a separate irrigation meter is not being provided. UDC Technical Standards 4-01.6.1.A.1. 7. Information Only Engineer & LA comment - The table in the PCRFCD Manuel can be used in lieu of the Water Budget Table, the only thing that is missing is water demand for plants, which can be added. Make sure units match. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/14/2022 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | Fire Code Appeal shall be processed and approved by TFD prior to DP approval Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033 Fire Plans Examiner |
| 08/02/2022 | DSTIFFE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | DP22-0145 Comments: 1. Sheet 3- Add the street name to the DP, plan. 2. Sheet 3- Note No. 19 "Concrete Header." Do not install concrete header on a city street. The curb will be "depressed" vertical curb, per P.A.G. standard 209. 3. Call out sidewalk width of 5 Ft, on the plan. 4. Sheet 3- Note the sidewalk buffer 3 Ft between sidewalk and curb. David Stiffey DTM Project Coordinator David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/10/2022 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Passed | |
| 08/19/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. On the cover sheet please include the contact information for the firm that prepared the geotechnical report per Admin Manual section 2-06.4.1. 2. Show the back-up spur dimensions for the southern most parking space on the east parking row per UDC 7.4.6.F.4. 3. The parking space just south of the trash enclosure needs to be shown as 10' wide per UDC 7.4.6.D.2.b. 4. The trash enclosure needs to be shown 2' from the adjacent access lane per UDC 7.4.6.F.2.b. 5. Show a complete pedestrian circulation path including out to the trash enclosure. 6. The trash enclosure and parking spaces can't be in the sight visibility triangles. Revise as necessary. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/26/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Ed Sakwa cc: A. Juarez 08/26/2022 REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP22-0145 Site/Grading - Emerge Center. New community building and three new residence buildings. 6226 E LEE ST FEE BALANCE: $ 1,576.30 ONLINE PAYMENTS ** If the online amount doesn't match "Fee Balance" above, check again in a few hours ** https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this blank 4- "Continue" 5- In the Pay column - check the boxes YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. Title your SECOND submittal documents accordingly, example: 2_Comment Response Letter 3. UPLOAD documents to Filedrop: - Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) - Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) - Any other documents requested by review staff FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - "Existing Application" - "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff) Sharon Beasley, Certified Permit Technician City of Tucson, Planning & Development Services Dept. Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (for development packages, land splits, Thursday Presubmittal meetings) Email: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov (for building permits) |
| 08/26/2022 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | Passed | Email from: Nicholas Jordan To: CDRC 08/25/2022 Please remove Pima County Addressing from the review queue for this project. We will work with the project to finalize and issue building numbers. Thank you Nicholas Jordan Site Review Project Manager - Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 |