Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: DP22-0127
Parcel: 10304001R

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP22-0127
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/02/2022 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
06/14/2022 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
06/17/2022 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT: Columbus Park – Site Improvements
Development Package (1st Review)
DP22-0127

TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 17, 2022

DUE DATE: June 14, 2022

COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings and a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is May 25, 2023.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0127, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The use listed under SITE DATE is not correct and should be listed as PARKS AND RECREATION, REGIONAL PARK. Also, remove the reference to “(PROPOSED USE IS DEFINED PER THE USE SPECIFIC STANDARDS SECTION 4.8.3 & TABLE 4.8-1) as there are no Use Specific Standards associated with this use.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As both Silverbell Rd is designated as Arterial Scenic, and El Camino Del Cerro is designated as Arterial on the COT MS&R Map provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.3 SCENIC CORRIDOR ZONE (SCZ) AND UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R)”.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Remove Zoning and Land Use Note 2 from the plan and provide a lot coverage calculation that meets the requirements of UDC Article 6.4.2.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Revise the vehicle parking space calculation to show the total number required 75.

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The number of required accessible spaces is not correct and should be 7,see 2018 IBC Chapter 11, Table 1106.1. The calculation is base on the total space provided. Also, include the number of van accessible space required and provided.

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The short-term bicycle parking calculation is not correct. Review UDC Table 7.4.8-1 and provide a correct calculation.

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a short-term bicycle parking space detail that demonstrates that the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B & .C are met.

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The street setback list under Site Date is not correct. Per the definition of Established Area Setback properties that have street frontage on a street designated on the COT MS&R map do not qualify for Established Area Setbacks. Review UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 and Table 6.4.5.C-1 and provide the correct street perimeter yard setback.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov.

To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
06/22/2022 JPEELDA1 FIRE REVIEW Approved
06/28/2022 AWARNER1 LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL
TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination
FROM: Anne Warner, RLA
PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section

PROJECT: Columbus Park Fields
ACTIVITY NO: DP22-0127
Address: 3495 W El Camino del Cerro
Zoning: RX-1
Existing Use: Park
Proposed Use: Park

TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 28, 2022
DUE DATE: June 14, 2022
COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed.
This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting.
General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.

General Note - Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval.

1. Preserved Native Desert Landscape indicated on plans must be preserved in place in perpetuity if the set-aside method is applied. Otherwise, the Native Plant Preservation plan is required to inventory all protected plant species on site. UDC 7.7.5.A.1.

2. Silverbell Rd requires a 30' undisturbed buffer area because it is a Scenic Corridor Overlay, UDC 5.3.4.. A Board of Adjustement variance is required to deviate from the requirements of the SCZ, UDC 5.3.14, 3.10.1 and 3.10.3. Note 15 on the cover sheet is incorrect.

3. Please provide all landscape calculations on the landscape plan, including required trees for the parking areas, Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.A.2.c .

4. Please label the existing and future rights of way for all public streets, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a.

5. Placing trees along the edge of a parking area or at the ends of parking row does not meet the intent of the UDC. All spaces within 40' of a tree is only one of the requirements, and it is required to meet all. The intent is to provide as much shade on the asphalt as possible, and the requirement is 1 tree per 4 parking spaces; trees are expected to be placed within the parking area itself to mitigate the heat and glare radiated by the built environment, UDC 7.6.1.A.3. Trees are to be distributed evenly throughout the parking area, UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a., UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2

6. Please distinguish between the mitigation/salvage plants and the other required plants on the legend, symbol or any other method that would communicate the information. Please note that mitigation trees are in addition to other required trees.

7. Please provide a summary of quantities of mitigation and TOS plants in a manner that makes it simple to cross check between landscape and NPP plans.

8. Please indicate the installation of a private submeter if a separate irrigation meter is not being provided. UDC Technical Standards 4-01.6.1.A.1.

9. Add a detail showing the backflow preventor and a locking enclosure.

10. Please add a detail to show depressed landscape areas or indicate with notes.

11. Provide a detail to show tree planting with root barrier adjacent to walkways.

12. Maximizing water harvesting is required, UDC section 7.6.6.C requires the use of all runoff to supplement irrigation. Show how this is attained..


13. The basin floor requires something other than bare dirt, hydroseed or rock larger than 4" is acceptable.

14. The NPP monitor is responsible for an assessment of the condition of the site's plants one year after the final inspection has been performed on the site. The monitor shall visit the site and prepare a report on plant status, including general plant condition, the identification of plants under stress and the appropriate method to relieve the stress, and recommendations for replacement of plants that are dead or dying. Dead or dying plants must be replaced with the same size plant at a one-to-one ratio of like genus and species. Copies of the report must be submitted to the site owner/developer and to PDSD. The owner must respond to the plant needs as outlined in the status report within six months of report submittal or within a shorter period if required to improve the health of stressed plants and prevent plant loss.

15. Please identify the project monitor prior to any grading activities, UDC 7.7.5. On-monitoring of all aspects of site clearing, grading, plant protection, preservation, salvage, and mitigation must be provided during project construction at the expense of the developer for all residential development that is over five acres and for all commercial and industrial development that is over one acre . The monitoring must be performed by an individual who is qualified in arid lands native plant resource identification and protection as specified in UDC Section 7.7.4.D, Professional Expertise. The monitor must provide periodic progress reports to the developer outlining the status of work accomplished and any problems encountered. A copy of these reports must be submitted to the PDSD for the project file.

16. Identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on landscape plans.

17. Provide a maintenance schedule for the landscape and irrigation for this project, in accordance with UDC 2-10-4.2.A.4., please be specific.


RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package

YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop
https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp
Select "Existing Application"
1) Comment Response Letter (your response to
the reviewer's Requires changes comments)
2) Plan Set (or individual sheets)
3) Any other items requested by review staff

If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov
08/11/2022 SBLOOD1 ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Show a trash enclosure detail that is compliant with Technical Standards Manual section 8.
2. Demonstrate how this site is maximizing water harvesting by showing landscaped areas depressed 6"-9" with curb cuts allowing runoff to enter.
3. The site is within the 100-yr floodplain and requires a floodplain use permit for the grading work proposed. Please follow the instruction below to apply using our online portal:

Please start a new FUP at our permit application web page: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp.
Instructions:
1. Is this for a new or existing activity application? - Please select New Application.

2. Submission Type - Select Floodplain Use Permit.

3. Project Name - Enter a name for your project.

4. Type of Permit - Select Commercial or Residential (Residential is for work on single family residences and duplexes.)

5. Select Street Name from the list. You can type the first two letters or number to get closer to your choice in the list. Then select the rest of the address in the boxes provided.

6. Description of Work - Enter in Floodplain Use Permit for…and then put a description of the work being done or reference the building permit number associated with this floodplain use permit.

7. Complete the Applicant Info. (Note APA# is for applicants with an advance payment account. Leave blank is you do not have an APA account.

8. Complete the Contractor, Owner and Architect/Engineer sections as applicable.

9. Supporting Documentation Upload - Provide a complete cost estimate for the project unless it is for a new build/separate structure. You may also provide additional documents you think will be helpful.

10. Sign the application and submit.

Stephen Blood
(520) 837-4958
Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov
08/15/2022 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change Email from: COTDSDPermits
To: Dustin Simmons
08/15/2022


REVIEW NOTICE

Returned for Corrections: DP22-0127
Site/Grading/Swppp - Columbus Park. New parking, baseball and soccer fields, field lighting, restroom structure, and associated site work (City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Dept.).
3495 W EL CAMINO DEL CERRO

FEE BALANCE: $ 2,950.28
Please pay at a minimum, the REVIEW category fees.
A payment is required before your next submittal.

ONLINE PAYMENTS
** If the online amount doesn't match "Fee Balance" shown above, check back in a few hours **
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees
1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees
2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000
(not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed)
3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this field blank
4- "Continue"
5- In the Pay column - check the boxes
6- "Continue"

YOUR NEXT STEPS
1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro
(If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.)
- Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number
- Permits - click on blue tab
- Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS
- Documents section - click on VIEW

2. Title your SECOND submittal documents accordingly, example: 2_Comment Response Letter

3. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL to Filedrop:
- Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments)
- Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made)
- Any other documents requested by review staff

FILEDROP
https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp
- "Existing Application"
- "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff)
- Select "PLANS" for all documents


Sharon Beasley, Certified Permit Technician

City of Tucson, Planning & Development Services Dept.
Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov
(for development packages, land splits, Thursday Presubmittal meetings)
Email: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov
(for building permits)