Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP22-0123
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/02/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/13/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The rim elevation of Manhole S3, the next upstream manhole, is 2381.48'. Plumbing fixtures located on a floor elevation of 2382.48' or less (not 2382.99'), will require a backwater valve . Fixtures located 12" or more above the rim elevation of the next upstream manhole shall not discharge through the backwater valve. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018. |
| 06/14/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Cascade Apartments ACTIVITY NO: DP22-0123 Address: 1346 N Stone Ave Zoning: OCR-1 Existing Use: Educational Use Proposed Use: Multi-family TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 14, 2022 DUE DATE: June 10, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 2. General Note - Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 3. Please identify all hatching on landscape plan. 4. Please label the existing and future rights of way for all public streets, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 5. The parking calculations are incorrect, there are 53 spaces and 13 trees are required to be placed to maximize shade in the parking area. The placement now does not accomplish this, please revise. Placing trees along the edge of a parking area or at the ends of parking row does not meet the intent of the UDC. All spaces within 40' of a tree is only one of the requirements, and it is required to meet all. The intent is to provide as much shade on the asphalt as possible, and the requirement is 1 tree per 4 parking spaces; trees are expected to be placed within the parking area itself to mitigate the heat and glare radiated by the built environment, UDC 7.6.1.A.3. Trees are to be distributed evenly throughout the parking area, UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a., UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2 6. Please add a detail to show depressed landscape areas or indicate with notes. 7. Provide a detail to show tree planting with root barrier adjacent to walkways. 8. A Commercial Rainwater Harvesting plan is required. Multi-family projects are commercial developments. UDC Technical Standards Manual - Section 4-01.0.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening. Demonstrate how water harvesting is being maximized. 9. The grading plan (is almost complete) and water harvesting plan (not submitted) do not meet the requirements of the water harvesting ordinance and technical standard. The plan doesn't show the effective use of run-off to supplement irrigation. a. The catchment areas must provide water to the infiltration areas. Revise the grading to direct runoff to the landscape infiltration areas to the maximum extent possible. b. Catchment areas in the water harvesting table can only count the areas that are directed to the landscape infiltration areas. c. Clearly show the areas in each catchment area and the areas of effective infiltration and water harvesting. All landscape areas should be included within infiltration areas. d. UDC section 7.6.6.C requires the use of all runoff to supplement irrigation. Show how this is attained. e. Provide a planting inventory or some other mechanism so we can confirm the canopy areas for each water harvesting infiltration area. Ensure all on-site landscape areas are accounted in the canopy area. f. Show rooftop drainage patterns and show how they are incorporated into the water harvesting calculations. g. Water harvesting areas should be depressed between 6 and 9 inches. These areas can be counted toward first flush retention requirements. 16. Provide a maintenance schedule for the landscape and irrigation for this project. UDC 2-10-4.2.A.4., please be specific. Please add that shearing shrubs is prohibited. 17. Grading, hydrology, and landscape plans must be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. UDC 7.6.6.C.2. The landscape, water harvesting, and grading plans must match. 13. Retention/detention basins should be designed naturally and organically, whenever practicable. Square and rectangles are not organic shapes. 14. The basin floor requires something other than bare dirt, hydroseed or rock larger than 4" is acceptable. 22. The native plants in the right of way cannot be counted towards the mitigation requirements for the site. Please redo the calculations to reflect only plants within the property. Required mitigation trees are in addition to other required plants. 23. The monitor is responsible for an assessment of the condition of the site's plants one year after the final inspection has been performed on the site. The monitor shall visit the site and prepare a report on plant status, including general plant condition, the identification of plants under stress and the appropriate method to relieve the stress, and recommendations for replacement of plants that are dead or dying. Dead or dying plants must be replaced with the same size plant at a one-to-one ratio of like genus and species. Copies of the report must be submitted to the site owner/developer and to PDSD. The owner must respond to the plant needs as outlined in the status report within six months of report submittal or within a shorter period if required to improve the health of stressed plants and prevent plant loss. 23. Please identify the project monitor prior to any grading activities, UDC 7.7.5. On-monitoring of all aspects of site clearing, grading, plant protection, preservation, salvage, and mitigation must be provided during project construction at the expense of the developer for all residential development that is over five acres and for all commercial and industrial development that is over one acre . The monitoring must be performed by an individual who is qualified in arid lands native plant resource identification and protection as specified in UDC Section 7.7.4.D, Professional Expertise. The monitor must provide periodic progress reports to the developer outlining the status of work accomplished and any problems encountered. A copy of these reports must be submitted to the PDSD for the project file. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/15/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Cascade Apartments – Multi-Family for the Elderly Development Package (1st Review) DP22-0123 TRANSMITTAL DATE: Revised June 17, 2022 DUE DATE: June 10, 2022 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings and a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is May 08, 2023. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0123, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 – As the proposed and existing cmu wall with wrought iron called out under Keynotes 20 & 27 are located within the SVT clearly demonstrate that the requirements of TSM Section 10-01.5.1.A are met. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Access to the exiting loading space for the billboard shall meet the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.I. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.C.4 are met for the proposed vehicle parking space just south of the existing Billboard. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.c – Demonstrate how access to the billboard on the adjacent property will be provided. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.c – Cleary demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.5.4.A.2 are met for the billboard loading space. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.e are met. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Based on the height provided the street perimeter yard setback shown from Stone Ave is not correct. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 06/22/2022 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | IFC 2018, Chapter 9 Section 905.3.1 Height. Class II Standpipe systems shall be installed throughout buildings where any of the following conditions exist: (1) Four or more stories are above or below grade plane (2) The floor level of the highest story is located more than 30' above the lowest level of fire department access. IFC 2018, Chapter 5, Section 507.5.1.1 Hydrant for Standpipe Systems. Buildings equipped with a standpipe system installed in accordance with Section 905 shall have a fire hydrant within 100 feet of the fire department connections. The 4 story shall have one full side with aerial fire department access IFC 2018, Appendix D, D105.3. Provide a Fire Protection Sheet that will show the aerial access along with a note: Parking spaces along aerial access road shall never have awnings, carports, solar shades and or other obstructions placed and or planted. Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Jennifer.Peel-Davis@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033Fire Plans Examiner |
| 07/29/2022 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | Passed | Email from: Nicholas Jordan <Nicholas.Jordan@pima.gov> To: CDRC Fri 7/29/2022 9:37 AM Please remove Pima County Addressing from the review for DP22-0123 Cascade Apartments. We will handle the unit addressing outside of the DP process. Thank you Nicholas Jordan Site Review Project Manager - Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 |
| 08/01/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Include the contact information of the firm responsible for the Geotechnical report including name, address, email, and phone number. 2. Clarify if any vehicular access to the site will be gated or just pedestrian entrances. 3. The grading plan (is almost complete) and water harvesting plan (not submitted) do not meet the requirements of the water harvesting ordinance and technical standard. The plan doesn't show the effective use of run-off to supplement irrigation. a. The catchment areas must provide water to the infiltration areas. Revise the grading to direct runoff to the landscape infiltration areas to the maximum extent possible. b. Catchment areas in the water harvesting table can only count the areas that are directed to the landscape infiltration areas. c. Clearly show the areas in each catchment area and the areas of effective infiltration and water harvesting. All landscape areas should be included within infiltration areas. d. UDC section 7.6.6.C requires the use of all runoff to supplement irrigation. Show how this is attained. e. Provide a planting inventory or some other mechanism so we can confirm the canopy areas for each water harvesting infiltration area. Ensure all on-site landscape areas are accounted in the canopy area. f. Show rooftop drainage patterns and show how they are incorporated into the water harvesting calculations. g. Water harvesting areas should be depressed between 6 and 9 inches. These areas can be counted toward first flush retention requirements. 4. In the drainage report on the conceptual drainage plan clarify what is going on at CP-2 and CP-2.1, why the need for the 8" storm drain pipe if there is a sidewalk scupper and swale discharging into the parking lot and eventually into the water harvesting basin, where does the 0.6 cfs at CP-2.1 come from if at CP-2 it is 0.3 cfs, and why isn't the landscape area depressed for water harvesting just before discharging at CP-2.1? Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/01/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Jason Morse Mon 8/1/2022 3:24 PM REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP22-0123 Site/Grading/Swppp - Cascade Apartments. New 4-story multi-family development with associated parking and landscaping. 1346 N STONE AV FEE BALANCE: $ 1,807.30 Please pay at a minimum, the REVIEW category fees. A payment is required before your next submittal. ONLINE PAYMENTS ** If the online amount doesn't match "Fee Balance" shown above, check back in a few hours ** https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this field blank 4- "Continue" 5- In the Pay column - check the boxes 6- "Continue" YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. Title your SECOND submittal documents accordingly, example: 2_Comment Response Letter 3. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL to Filedrop: - Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) - Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) - Any other documents requested by review staff FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - "Existing Application" - "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff) - Select "PLANS" for all documents Sharon Beasley, Certified Permit Technician City of Tucson, Planning & Development Services Dept. Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (for development packages, land splits, Thursday Presubmittal meetings) Email: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov (for building permits) |