Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP22-0118
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/29/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/14/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Institute for Better Education – Covered Parking Development Package (2nd Review) DP22-0118 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 14, 2022 DUE DATE: July 20, 2022 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings and a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is May 05, 2023. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. This comment was not fully addressed, show Swan RD on the location map. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.B - Label all streets that abut the subject property on the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. This comment was not addressed. Per UDC TABLE 4.8-4: PERMITTED USES - COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE ZONES, Commercial Services Land Use Group With Land Use Class/Type: an Administrative and Professional Office use is subject to Use Specific Standard 4.9.13.O. Provide the Use Specific Standard under Zoning and Land Use Note 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Provide the Use Specific Standards for an Administrative and Professional Office use in the C-1 Zone under General Note 4. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 3. The setback shown from the proposed shade structure is not correct. As vehicle parking is allowed on Benton Ave the setback is measured from edge of the nearest travel lane, 8’-0” west of the vertical curb. Provide a setback dimension from the nearest edge of travel lane to the shade structure. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – As this overall site boarders on a street, Swan Rd, designated as an Arterial on the COT MS&R map the street perimeter yard setbacks for both Swan Rd and Benton Ave are based on UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 & Table 6.4.5.C-1. The street perimeter yard setbacks shown on the plan for both Swan Rd and Benton Ave are not correct. Perimeter yard setback along Swan is based on an ADT of 1,000 or greater, which requires a setback of 21’ or the height of the proposed exterior building wall, greater of the two measured from the back of curb. Perimeter yard setback along Benton is based on an ADT over 140 but less than 1,000, which requires a setback of 21’ or the height of the proposed exterior building wall, greater of the two measured from the outside edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane. Show the correct street perimeter yard setback from the proposed covered parking structure to the outside edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane along Benton Ave. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – There is a “PROPOSED (REF. BUILDING PERM.)” 8’-0” high metal fence as shown on building permit T21CM09091. As this fence exceeds 6’-0” provide a perimeter yard setback dimension from the fence to the nearest edge of travel lane along Benton Ave. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 07/15/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | email from: COTDSDPermits To: Michael Hernandez Fri 7/15/2022 2:12 PM REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP22-0118 Site - Institute for Better Education. Parking shade structure. 921 N SWAN RD FEE BALANCE: credit of $-66.00 YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. Title your THIRD submittal documents accordingly, example: 3_Comment Response Letter 3. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL to Filedrop: - Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) - Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) - Any other documents requested by review staff FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - "Existing Application" - "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff) - Select "PLANS" for all documents Sharon Beasley, Certified Permit Technician City of Tucson, Planning & Development Services Dept. Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (for development packages, land splits, Thursday Presubmittal meetings) Email: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov (for building permits) |