Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP22-0117
Parcel: 11450004K

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP22-0117
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/16/2022 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
05/19/2022 SBLOOD1 ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change Development Package Comments:
Sheet 1
1. Sheet numbers don't match the index. Please revise.
2. Project reference number is DP 22-0117. Please add reference number to all sheets.

Sheet 3
3. Please ensure keynote 11 points to all cleanouts/septic items to be removed.

Sheet 4
4. Please add parking count circles to legend.
5. Delineate vehicle maneuverability for refuse collection area and dimension clear zone.
6. Please add to the drainage report a discussion of the maintenance responsibility of continual feces removal within detention basin.
7. Please clarify if the entire basin area will be open to animals. Landscape plan labels indicate yes. If so, please add appropriate fencing linework around the limits of the exercise area.

Sheet 5
8. Detail 8 does not show pipes. Please revise to read detail 9.
9. Please clarify spot elevation labels FG 7.55 and GB,FG 7.74 location/purpose by adding linework/flow arrows.
10. Please add additional slope tags in all pavement areas to demonstrate adequate drainage slopes.
11. (TSM 10-01.4.2.F.2) Hand rails are required for any ramp other than a curb ramp with a rise greater than six inches. Please check all ramps, specifically the ones on the eastern side of the new building.
12. Reference sheet number C7.1 for the location of Detail 13 in the outfall grading callout.
13. Please include sheet numbers for all detail references.

Sheet 6
14. Provide design explaination for placing waterline/hydrant within basin.

Sheet 7
15. Please add a vertical curve to detail 7 as the gradebreak is greater than 4%.
16. Please provide detail for modified curb mentioned in Detail 1's keynote 8.
17. Please consult comment on sheet C5.0 regarding use of handrail in Detail 8.
18. In Detail 9, please show the pavement section. RCP should have minimum 1' cover below the pavement section and minimum 3' cover below unimproved areas. Please revise.

Sheet 8
19. Please note that an offsite grading permit will be required for connection to existing swale on NW corner.
20. Please revise weir elevation in detail 13 contractor notes. Weir elevation should read 2506.25 instead of 2606.25.
21. In detail 13, please include all basin information as shown on sheet 5.
22. This basin appears to be constructed with embankments which requires 12" of free board. Please revise the weir elevation and/or bottom/top of basin to accommodate this freeboard.
23. Please provide an estimated drainage slope from weir outlet to connection to existing in Detail 11.

Sheet 10
24. Please provide SWPPP details in the final SWPPP document and include reference to the appropriate BMPs in the legend.
25. Please provide inlet protection for the entrance drive culvert and the spillway northeast of the basin.
26. Erosion measures should be included for the grading of the basin weir oulet to the connection to existing ground. Extend the disturbance area to match this location.

Sheet 11
27. Sheet numbers don't match the index. Please revise.

Sheet 12
28. Landscape plans show utilities in different locations than civil plans, typical. Please revise.




Drainage Statement Comments:
1. Section 2.2 2nd paragraph - Please switch order of "is it.." in second sentence.
2. Section 3.2 - Please add sentence stating detention/retention requirements as well as peak discharge reduction percentage
3. Section 3.2 1st paragraph - please state weir shape
4. Section 3.2 - Please discuss required basin freeboard, side slopes, etc
5. Section 5.1 Scuppers Table - Please match Length Provided and Ldesign in Appendix C; revise calcs if necessary
6. Section 5.1 - Please state in paragraph scupper was designed for 10-yr frequency design storm event, and explain what happens in the 100-year event.
7. Section 5.3 - Please add "ft" after 7.87 headwater value.
8. Section 5.3 - Please add information for the asterisk symbol under the headwater column in the Culvert Table and add column with culvert length and material
9. Section 5.4 - Please add rip rap apron calcs for scupper rip rap apron as well as reference for the manual or equations used to size riprap.
10. Figure 7 - Please add linestyle for existing basin to figure and add to legend or callout.
11. Figure 8 - Please label proposed scupper, culvert, at grade crossing, and proposed channel
12. Figure 9 - Please label proposed scupper, culvert, at grade crossing, and proposed channel
13. Section 3.2 - Please state whether the site is located within a balanced or critical basin
14. Sectoin 4.1 - FEMA Maps and FIS Report do not always reflect correct information. Please confirm and explain why the floodway and floodplain elevations are the same; ie located in a backwater or ineffective flow area behind Tanque Verde Road.
15. Section 4.2 - Please provide a Radius/TW calculation to demonstrate Eqn. 7.7a is correct. Please also include the calculation sheet stated as in appendix C that appears to be missing. Please state the distance of the site from the channel bank as the measurement used to comply with EHS standards.
16. Section 5.1 - Q10 for paved areas is typically 50% of the Q100 though shown as only 0.4cfs in the scupper table. Please verify design discharge and scupper size, and revise report as necessary to reflect any changes.
17. Section 5. - Please state the equation or reference used to calculated channel freeboard.
18. Sectino 5.2 - Channels are typically designed with a minimum slope of 0.30. Please explain the reasoning a lesser slope was used and the potential for sedimentation.
19. Section 5.3 - Please explain if the flow along Woodland exists prior to the development, or revise the design to show no impact outside of the property limits.
20. Section 5.2 - Please provide a discussion of erosion protection along channel for off site flows entering it.
21. Section 5.4 - Please provide apron thickness and flare
22. Section 5.5 - Please provide justification for the header sizing. The 1984 Pima County Channel Design Guidelines provide equations, or state that a 2' minimum depth is required upstream and that the minimum width shall extend across the 10-year flood depth. Please also describe the dip crossing to be 4% or explain why that is not feasible.
23. Figure 5 - Please label culvert adjacent to OS1 and demonstrates it capacity to convey the 100-year event without breakout toward the proposed development.
24. Scupper calculation - The calculation sheet shows the orifice equation as being the flow type, however the equations shown at the top of the page indicate orifice flow occurs when the ponded depth is 1.4times the opening height, therefore orifice flow isn't occurring. It also seems incorrect that weir flow provides a greater flow rate than orifice. Please review the excel spreadsheet to confirm the result and revise if necessary.
25. Appendix Cross Section Data - Please include a cross section depiction with the flow depth shown
26. PDF Page 58 - Please provide a title for this calculation and include the result in the text of the report.

This project was reviewed by a contract reviewer. If you have questions about any of these comments contact Stephen Blood at Stephen.Blood@TucsonAz.gov or Loren Makus at Loren.Makus@TucsonAz.gov.
06/01/2022 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Freeze-proof safety yard hydrants that use a below-grade stop-and-waste valve (keynote W7, Sheet C6.0) are prohibited unless an approved upstream backflow prevention device is use to protect the upstream potable water source and the downstream outlets are identified with signs that read, "Caution, Nonpotable water, Do Not Drink." Reference: Sections 608.8 and 608.9.1, IPC 2018.
06/09/2022 PAUL CAMARENA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL



TO: Development Services Department

Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Paul Camarena

PDSD Zoning Review Section



PROJECT: 8300 E TANQUE VERDE RD

Development Package (1st Review)

DP22-0117

TRANSMITTAL DATE: 6/09/2022

DUE DATE: 6/07/2022


COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.


Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is June 9 , 2022 .

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)



2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:



2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;

COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.B - Provide the legal description "TANQUE VERDE COUNTRY ESTS CTRL PTN LOT 4"



2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx).
COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D - Revise the page number to accurately reflect the sheet index.



2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP22-0117, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.


2-06.4.7 - General Notes

The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.
Zoning and Land Use Notes



2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Revise this note to state " The existing use of the property is Animal service, General and will remain the same, and is subject to use specific standard 4.9.4.D.5

2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan.



COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 - Provide a note that this site subject to MS&R arterial scenic overlay.

The following comments are related to the MS&R overlay

5.3.5.A. The maximum height of a structure is one-third the distance of the structure from the future right-of-way line , with the following exceptions. (See Figure 5.3-C.) . Nonresidential structures shall not exceed 30 feet in height.

5.3.9. UTILITIES A. All new utilities for development on private property and on public right-of-way along Scenic Routes shall be underground.

B. Where possible, existing poles shall be used to provide the required transition to underground service to new developments adjacent to scenic corridors. However, a new pole set in line with the existing overhead system when necessary to serve approved new developments is not deemed to be a new utility. Upgrades and reinforcements of existing overhead facilities is allowed to the extent that the total number of electrical circuits or communication cables is not increased. Relocation of overhead utility facilities required by public improvement districts along scenic corridors shall conform with existing franchise standards.

C. When an existing development is expanded by 50% or more in floor area or land area, new and existing utilities to all portions of the development shall be located underground. Incremental expansion shall be cumulative.

5.3.13. GRADING

Grading cannot occur until 30 days prior to building construction. For commencement of grading , the building construction plans shall be, at minimum, in the review process for permits, or the building construction permits shall have already been ready to be issued. Grading permits shall cover only those areas for which base plans have been approved






2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:


2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building;
COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Provide the information noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage;
COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Provide the information noted by the standard above. In the SR zone the lot coverage maximum for Nonres is 15%. If this site is not able to adhere to the to the 15% maximum lot coverage a Board of Adjustment for Variance will be required. Board of Adjustment requirements and application can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Zoning_Administration_Application_BA_fillable.pdf. The Board of Adjustment is a separate submittal from the building plan and is submitted at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd-filedrop, using the Submission Type “Zoning Administration”. Contact Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov if you have any questions about the Board of Adjustment.




2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions

The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.


2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B - If applicable provide the information noted by the standard above.



2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C - Provide the recordation data for the right of way adjacent to the site as noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development

The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.



2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - Provide the information noted by the standard above for the lots across the right of way.






2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Provide the information noted by the standard above





2-06.4.9.H.3 - Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability.


COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.3 - Show fire circulation as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.



COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Provide a dimension for the PAALs located on the west side of the new building. Dimension the Drive on the east side of the new building. Clarify if the Drive areas are to be considered a two way or one way access lane.





2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.)



COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.J - Provide information noted by the standard above for Tanque Verde.


2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.



COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O - Provide the information noted by the standard above. Show how the New Livestock round pen/chutes adhere to Use specific standard 4.9.4.D.5 :The minimum perimeter yard for buildings , shelters, animal runs, and fenced areas from a property line adjacent to a residential zone is 100 feet.





2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).



COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the information noted by the standard above





2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.



COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R - Show pedestrian circulation to the New Livestock round ped. Clearly show how vehicles are to get to the chutes. Show how this portion of the site is going to be accessed





2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual.


COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.S - Sidewalks maybe required along woodland rd





2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm.


COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.T - Show vehicle maneuverability as noted by the standard above








***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations






If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Paul Camarena at (520)837-4986 or by email Paul.Camarena@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
06/09/2022 AWARNER1 LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL
TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination
FROM: Anne Warner, RLA
PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section

PROJECT: Adobe Veterinary Center
ACTIVITY NO: DP22-0117
Address: 83 E tanque Verde Rd
Zoning: SR
Existing Use: undisturbed Sonoran Desert, Veterinary Services
Proposed Use: Veterinary Services

TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 9, 2022
DUE DATE: June 3, 2022
COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed.
This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting.
1. General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.

2. General Note - Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval.

3. Please provide all landscape calculations on the landscape plan, including required trees for the parking areas, Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.A.2.c and landscape borders, UDC Technical Standards 2-10.4.2.f & g.

4. Please label the existing and future rights of way for all public streets, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a.

5. Please add a detail to show depressed landscape areas or indicate with notes.

6. The grading plan and water harvesting plan do not meet the requirements of the water harvesting ordinance and technical standard. The plan doesn't show the effective use of run-off to supplement irrigation.
a. The catchment areas must provide water to the infiltration areas. Revise the grading to direct runoff to the landscape infiltration areas to the maximum extent possible.
b. Catchment areas in the water harvesting table can only count the areas that are directed to the landscape infiltration areas.
c. Clearly show the areas in each catchment area and the areas of effective infiltration and water harvesting. All landscape areas should be included within infiltration areas.
d. UDC section 7.6.6.C requires the use of all runoff to supplement irrigation. Show how this is attained.
e. Provide a planting inventory or some other mechanism so we can confirm the canopy areas for each water harvesting infiltration area. Ensure all on-site landscape areas are accounted in the canopy area.
f. Show rooftop drainage patterns and show how they are incorporated into the water harvesting calculations.
g. Water harvesting areas should be depressed between 6 and 9 inches. These areas can be counted toward first flush retention requirements.

7. Identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on water harvesting or landscape plans.

17. Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention is required and shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-manual-board-version-201511.pdf

COT edits - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Detention_Retention_Manual_Tech_Standards_Amemdments.pdf

18. Grading, hydrology, and landscape plans must be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. UDC 7.6.6.C.2. The landscape, water harvesting, and grading plans must match.

11. The basin floor requires something other than bare dirt, hydroseed or rock larger than 4” is acceptable.

12. The monitor is responsible for an assessment of the condition of the site’s plants one year after the final inspection has been performed on the site. The monitor shall visit the site and prepare a report on plant status, including general plant condition, the identification of plants under stress and the appropriate method to relieve the stress, and recommendations for replacement of plants that are dead or dying. Dead or dying plants must be replaced with the same size plant at a one-to-one ratio of like genus and species. Copies of the report must be submitted to the site owner/developer and to PDSD. The owner must respond to the plant needs as outlined in the status report within six months of report submittal or within a shorter period if required to improve the health of stressed plants and prevent plant loss.

13. Please note that smaller caliper trees can used for TOS and may be counted towards larger caliper tree quantities or mitigation plants.

14. Please identify the project monitor prior to any grading activities, UDC 7.7.5. On-monitoring of all aspects of site clearing, grading, plant protection, preservation, salvage, and mitigation must be provided during project construction at the expense of the developer for all residential development that is over five acres and for all commercial and industrial development that is over one acre . The monitoring must be performed by an individual who is qualified in arid lands native plant resource identification and protection as specified in UDC Section 7.7.4.D, Professional Expertise. The monitor must provide periodic progress reports to the developer outlining the status of work accomplished and any problems encountered. A copy of these reports must be submitted to the PDSD for the project file.


RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package

YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop
https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp
Select "Existing Application"
1) Comment Response Letter (your response to
the reviewer's Requires changes comments)
2) Plan Set (or individual sheets)
3) Any other items requested by review staff

If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov
06/13/2022 JPEELDA1 FIRE REVIEW Reqs Change New Building is 4,996 square feet and requires a fire hydrant within 400' of the furthest part of the new building as the hose lays and or fire sprinklers shall be installed. IFC 2018, Chapter 5, Section 507.5.1

Questions:
Jennifer Peel-Davis
Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov
520-837-7033
07/14/2022 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change email from: COTDSDPermits
To: Jason Morse
Thu 7/14/2022 8:54 AM

REVIEW NOTICE

Returned for Corrections: DP22-0117
Site/Grading/Swppp - Adobe Veterinary Center. New building, with parking and drainage improvements.
8300 E TANQUE VERDE RD

FEE BALANCE: $ 2,043.70
Please pay at a minimum, the REVIEW category fees.
A payment is required before your next submittal.

ONLINE PAYMENTS
** If the online amount doesn't match "Fee Balance" shown above, check back in a few hours **
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees
1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees
2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000
(not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed)
3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this field blank
4- "Continue"
5- In the Pay column - check the boxes
6- "Continue"

YOUR NEXT STEPS
1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro
(If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.)
- Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number
- Permits - click on blue tab
- Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS
- Documents section - click on VIEW

2. Title your SECOND submittal documents accordingly, example: 2_Comment Response Letter

3. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL to Filedrop:
- Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments)
- Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made)
- Any other documents requested by review staff

FILEDROP
https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp
- "Existing Application"
- "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff)
- Select "PLANS" for all documents


Sharon Beasley, Certified Permit Technician

City of Tucson, Planning & Development Services Dept.
Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov
(for development packages, land splits, Thursday Presubmittal meetings)
Email: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov
(for building permits)
07/14/2022 SBEASLE1 PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING Passed email from: Nicholas Jordan <Nicholas.Jordan@pima.gov>
To: CDRC
Wed 7/13/2022 4:46 PM

Please remove Pima County Addressing from the review queue for DP22-0117 as it does not require review.

I’m happy to issue building numbers to the applicant outside of the review process.
Thank you

Nicholas Jordan
Site Review Project Manager - Addressing Official

Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-9623