Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP22-0112
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/25/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/16/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. An approved development plan is not to be used for construction or modification of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to buildings, building sewers, site lighting, electrical service to buildings, etc.). The construction of the on-site utilities may be included with the permit for constructing the building or as a separate permit. 2. A separate permit is required for the installation of a private sewer collection system with manholes and will require a review of the system design by the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality. Reference Title 18, R18-9-E302, 4.02 General Permit, Arizona Administrative Code. |
| 06/22/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Valencia Road Self Storage – 5000 E Valencia Rd Development Package (1st Review) DP22-0112 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 22, 2022 DUE DATE: June 22, 2022 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings and a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is May 24, 2023. 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.2.4 – The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. That said remove all building plan sheets from the DP package. Additional comments maybe forth coming once the drawing set is modified as there is required information scattered throughout the plan set and numerous duplications of information. The following comments are based on sheets 1 – 11. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – Once the building plan sheets have been removed revise the list of drawings. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D - Once the building plan sheets have been removed revise the page number and the total number of pages 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0112, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. COMMENT: Revise the vicinity map to meet the 3 following sections: 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map shall be drawn at a minimum scale of three-inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.B - Identify regional watercourses within the square mile area; and, 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Revise the “PROPOSED LAND USE” listed under “SITE PLAN DATA” on sheet one to include the applicable Use Specific Standards, see UDC TABLE 4.8-4: PERMITTED USES - COMMERCIAL AND MIXED-USE ZONES. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As I-10 is designated as a “STATE & INTERSTATE ROUTE” on the COT MS&R Map provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R)” 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Clearly show how access will be provided to this site to include the access lane and required sidewalk. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide a fully dimensioned vehicle use area. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Clearly indicate in the vehicle parking spaces calculation which buildings are included in the calculation for the storage units that do not have direct vehicular access. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation states “TOTAL STANDARD PARKING PROVIDED; 22 SPACES” and “PROVIDED ADA PARKING: 1 SPACES” which should add up to 23 spaces provide but there are only 22 spaces total on site, clarify. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Add number of required & provided Van Accessible spaces to the parking calculation. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a detail for the angled vehicle parking shown on the plan. This detail will clearly show that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.D are met. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Detail C sheet 6 shows a wheel stop located in the accessible parking space but the plans do not, clarify if a wheel stop is proposed and if so provide a wheel stop location dimension that meets the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.c – Provide a loading area calculation on the plan that provides the number required and provided, see UDC TABLE 7.5.5-A: REQUIRED LOADING AREAS. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a short- & long-term bicycle parking space calculation under the parking calculation on sheet 1 that shows the number required and provided. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Clearly show the required bicycle parking on the plan and provide a detail(s) that demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1, B.2, .C and if applicable .D are met. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the building height and square footage within the footprint of all buildings on site. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – As this site cannot stand alone and must access across the development to the north show the required sidewalk from this site out to the sidewalk along Valencia Rd, see TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A. 21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – For all buildings that do not provided direct vehicle access show the required sidewalks on the plan, see TSM Section 7-01.4.1.B 22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Show the proposed accessible access ramp on all plans and provide spot elevations. 23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Provide width dimensions for all proposed sidewalks on the plan. 24. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – As parking vehicles are allowed to overhang the sidewalk along the northwest side of “A” the sidewalk is required to 6’-6” wide to accommodate the required 4’-0” wide sidewalk and the 2’-6” vehicle overhang, TSM Section 7-01.4.3.A and UDC Article 7.4.9.H.3. 25. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also, provide a general note stating all signage requires a separate permit. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 06/22/2022 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide documentation that the new buildings meets the requirements of IFC 2018, Chapter 5, 507.5.1 of 400'. Provide a diagram to TFD from the nearest hydrant to the furthest part of the addition as the hose lays and the distance. If the distance exceeds 400' a fire sprinkler system shall be installed. 3 Story Building shall have fire sprinklers installed and the fire line shall be shown on the DP. DP Shows gates and those gates shall have a note KNOX Locking switch required on all powered gates along with KNOX Box Buildings exceeding 30' shall have one full side with aerial fire department access IFC 2018, Appendix D, D105.3 and the road shall meet D105.2 & D105.3. Fire apparatus access roads shall extend to within 150 feet of all portions of a facility IFC 2018, Chapter 5, Section 503. Provide a Fire Protection Sheet that will show the aerial access along with a note: Aerial access shall also meet D105.4 Obstructions. Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Jennifer.Peel-Davis@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033 Fire Plans Examiner |
| 07/05/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Valencia Storage ACTIVITY NO: DP22-0112 Parcel: 140-39-043B Zoning: C-2 Existing Use: Undisturbed Sonoran Desert Proposed Use: Personal storage TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 5, 2022 DUE DATE: June 17, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. General Note - Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 1. Engineer & LA comment - Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention is required for first-flush and shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. First-flushhttps://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-manual-board-version-201511.pdf COT edits - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Detention_Retention_Manual_Tech_Standards_Amemdments.pdf 2. The grading plan and water harvesting plan do not meet the requirements of the water harvesting ordinance and technical standard. The plan doesn't show the effective use of run-off to supplement irrigation. a. The catchment areas must provide water to the infiltration areas. Revise the grading to direct runoff to the landscape infiltration areas to the maximum extent possible. b. Catchment areas in the water harvesting table can only count the areas that are directed to the landscape infiltration areas. c. Clearly show the areas in each catchment area and the areas of effective infiltration and water harvesting. All landscape areas should be included within infiltration areas. d. UDC section 7.6.6.C requires the use of all runoff to supplement irrigation. Show how this is attained. e. Provide a planting inventory or some other mechanism so we can confirm the canopy areas for each water harvesting infiltration area. Ensure all on-site landscape areas are accounted in the canopy area. f. Show rooftop drainage patterns and show how they are incorporated into the water harvesting calculations. g. Water harvesting areas should be depressed between 6 and 9 inches. These areas can be counted toward first flush retention requirements. The landscape, water harvesting, and grading plans must match. 3. Engineer & LA comment - The table in the PCRFCD Manuel can be used in lieu of the Water Budget Table, the only thing that is missing is water demand for plants, which can be added. Make sure units match. 4. Identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on water harvesting or landscape plans. 5. Please label the existing and future rights of way for all public streets, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 6. Please add a detail to show depressed landscape areas or indicate with notes. 7. Provide a detail to show tree planting with root barrier adjacent to walkways. 8. Retention/detention basins should be designed naturally and organically, whenever practicable. Square and rectangles are not organic shapes. 9. Please identify the project monitor prior to any grading activities, UDC 7.7.5. On-monitoring of all aspects of site clearing, grading, plant protection, preservation, salvage, and mitigation must be provided during project construction at the expense of the developer for all residential development that is over five acres and for all commercial and industrial development that is over one acre . The monitoring must be performed by an individual who is qualified in arid lands native plant resource identification and protection as specified in UDC Section 7.7.4.D, Professional Expertise. The monitor must provide periodic progress reports to the developer outlining the status of work accomplished and any problems encountered. A copy of these reports must be submitted to the PDSD for the project file. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/17/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Include the contact information for the firm that prepared the geotechnical report per Admin Manual section 2-06.4.1 2. Clarify how access to the site will be achieved along with the required pedestrian access to E Valencia Rd. 3. Show how the site is maximizing water harvesting by routing roof drainage and pavement runoff into the landscaped areas 4. Post development discharges in a critical basin are to be a 15% reduction not a 10% reduction. Please update the drainage report and to show compliance with the 15% reduction. The newly adopted Detention/Retention Manual can be found: https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-final-201406-manual.pdf With edits to the manual found: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Detention_Retention_Manual_Tech_Standards_Amemdments.pdf Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/19/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Michelle Bach 08/19/2022 REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP22-0112 Site/Grading/Swppp - Valencia Road Self Storage. The facility includes both climate-controlled self storage and non-climate controlled storage. 5000 E VALENCIA RD Fee Balance: amount is pending No payment is due at this time YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. Title your SECOND submittal documents accordingly, example: 2_Comment Response Letter 3. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL to Filedrop: - Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) - Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) - Any other documents requested by review staff FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - "Existing Application" - "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff) - Select "PLANS" for all documents Sharon Beasley, Certified Permit Technician City of Tucson, Planning & Development Services Dept. Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (for development packages, land splits, Thursday Presubmittal meetings) Email: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov (for building permits) |
| 09/06/2022 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | email from: Nicholas Jordan To: CDRC 09/06/2022 Please remove Pima County Addressing from the review for DP22-0112. The project can apply for building numbers after the DP is approved. Please note that the project requires a new address and building should be identified numerically. Thank you Nicholas Jordan Site Review Project Manager - Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 |