Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: DP22-0104
Parcel: 132171350

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - DP22-0104
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/29/2022 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
07/14/2022 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT: Halo Manufacturing
Development Package (2nd Review)
DP22-0104

TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 14, 2022

DUE DATE: July 20, 2022

COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings and a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is April 21, 2023.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

1. This comment was not addressed Provide the Use Specific Standards 4.9.9.E.2 and 4.9.13.Q within General Note 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Review UDC TABLE 4.8-5: PERMITTED USES - INDUSTRIAL ZONES and provide all applicable Use Specific Standards for a marijuana dispensary off-site manufacturing location use in I-1 Zone under General Note 1.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2. This comment was not addressed. Zoning was not able to find a percentage of expansion on sheet DP1 as stated in the comment response. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – Provide a building are expansion percentage on the plan

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

3. The bicycle parking space calculation is not correct. The calculation is based on a Retail Trade Uses Less Than 50,000 sq. ft. GFA, Short Term is based on 1 space per 5,000 sq. ft. GFA. Minimum requirement is 2 spaces. Also demonstrate on the plan or detail how the requirement of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.e is met for the short-term bicycle parking and how the requirement of UDC Article 7.4.9.D.5 is met for the long-term bicycle parking. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a short- & long-term bicycle parking calculation on the plan. This calculation shall provide the number required and provided. Per UDC Table 7.4.8-1: Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces a minimum 2 short-term 2 long-term spaces are required for the expansion. Show the require bicycle parking on the plan and provide a short- & long-term bicycle parking detail that demonstrates that the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B, .C & .D are met. If the intent is to use existing on-site bicycle parking to meet this requirement demonstrate that the existing bicycle parking meets the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B, .C & .D

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – No sidewalk widths were provided on the DP. Provide sidewalk width dimensions for all sidewalks shown on the plan, TSM Section 7-01.4.3.A

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nocholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov.

To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
08/05/2022 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change Email from: COTDSDPermits
To: Josh Carlson
Fri 8/5/2022 11:42 AM

REVIEW NOTICE

Returned for Corrections: DP22-0104
Site: Halo Manufacturing. Marijuana dispensary off-site location. Interior renovation to existing building. New 170 Sq. Ft. addition.
4401 S SANTA RITA Avenue

FEE BALANCE: $ 82.50
One extra hour review time for Fire Dept.

ONLINE PAYMENTS
** If the online amount doesn't match "Fee Balance" shown above, check back in a few hours **
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees
1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees
2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000
(not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed)
3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this field blank
4- "Continue"
5- In the Pay column - check the boxes
6- "Continue"

YOUR NEXT STEPS
1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro
(If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.)
- Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number
- Permits - click on blue tab
- Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS
- Documents section - click on VIEW

2. Title your THIRD submittal documents accordingly, example: 3_Comment Response Letter

3. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL to Filedrop:
- Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments)
- Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made)
- Any other documents requested by review staff

FILEDROP
https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp
- "Existing Application"
- "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff)
- Select "PLANS" for all documents


Sharon Beasley, Certified Permit Technician

City of Tucson, Planning & Development Services Dept.
Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov
(for development packages, land splits, Thursday Presubmittal meetings)
Email: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov
(for building permits)
08/05/2022 JVINCEN1 FIRE REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Hydrants do not meet the requirement of 2018 IFC 507.5.1. Hydrants shall not be more than 400 feet. Measurement shall be from the hydrant, as the hose lays, to the furthest point of the building. Add additional hydrants within the required distances to meet the fire flow.
2. The building does not meet the required fire flow per 2018 IFC Appendix B, Table B105.1(2). Fire flow of 2750 GPM/2hrs @ 20psi required per the table. Tucson Water only allows 1000gpm per hydrant. This would require three hydrants within the required distances or sprinler the building to take advantage of the reduction per IFC Table 105.2
john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov
5203495581