Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP22-0099
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/02/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/05/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: A-Family – Drexel/Campbell Development Package (1st Review) DP22-0099 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 05, 2022 DUE DATE: May 20, 2022 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings and a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is April 17, 2023. 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.2.2 – Remove all references to the LUC from this set as the LUC has not been applicable since 2011, i.e., Development Designator, Perimeter Yard Indicator, LUC 3.5.10.3, etc. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.3.5 – Remove the old development package stamp from all sheets as an electronic stamp will be affixed once the DP can be approved. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide an email address for the owner listed on sheet 1. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0099, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Remove the reference to “DP14-0098” & “DP12-0005” from all sheets as these plans have expired. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Revise General Note 2 so that it provides the correct UDC Use Specific Standards. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - Revise General Note 2r so that it provides the correct UDC Article reference. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Remove the reference to Floor Are Ratio as it is not applicable. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide a access lane width dimension from the northwest corner of the refuse enclosure to a point directly south of the southeast corner of the wrought iron fence just to the northwest of the enclosure. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Based on the height of 16’ for the proposed buildings the required setback of 22.5’ shown under setbacks and shown on sheet 2 to the east property line. 16 x 1.5 = 24’. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nocholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 05/11/2022 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA COUNTY - REGIONAL FLOOD CTRL DIST | Reqs Change | Email from: RFCD I J Reviews <rfcd.ij.reviews@pima.gov> To: CDRC Wed 5/11/2022 8:40 AM The District has the following comments: 1. Show the limits of the Drainage Easement, Docket 07098, Page 00883, along the south property boundary. 2. Call out the distance between the irrigation and the top of bank protection or provide a cross-section of the Rodeo Wash. Call out the bank protection and the existing fence. The District typically requires a minimum 12-foot setback from structures that may need maintenance or replacement. Because there is access on the south side of the Wash, a smaller setback is acceptable, but please show clearly the relation of all proposed improvements, including fencing and landscaping, and the easement boundary. Add a Permitting Note and/or call out on the plan sheets that any work in or access to the Drainage Easement requires a Facility Impact Permit. 3. CDRC, if possible, add a condition that prior to the pre-construction meeting, the contractor will submit a Facility Impact Permit to the Regional Flood Control District. Ann B. Moynihan, P.E., CFM Pima County Regional Flood Control District 201 N. Stone Avenue, 9th Floor Tucson AZ 85701 520-724-4638 |
| 05/12/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The maximum distance between cleanouts in the building sewer shall be 100-feet, measured along the developed pipe length. Reference: Section 708.1.1, IPC 2018. 2. Provide a cleanout in the building sewer prior to entering the right-of-way. Reference: Pima County Standard Detail RWRD 401, 2015. |
| 05/24/2022 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | I see that three hydrants are proposed. Can you please advise the Fire Flow that they will achieve? Provide diagram showing that all portions of the building can be reached by a fire hydrant as the hose lays with the distances Fire Department access lanes with a fire hydrant shall be 26' wide IFC 2018, Appendix D, Section D103.1 Provide documentation if the building will have fire sprinklers and the type of construction Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Jennifer.Peel-Davis@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033Fire Plans Examiner |
| 05/31/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: A-Family Storage ACTIVITY NO: DP22-0099 Address: Zoning: C-2 Existing Use: partially disturbed Sonoran desert Proposed Use: Personal Storage TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 31, 2022 DUE DATE: May 20, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 2. General Note - Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 3. Please refer to zoning conditions C9-09-04. An archaeological survey is required prior to grading on site, CoT Parks & Recreation must approve trail location and connection, landscape and irrigation, prior to approval, color elevations, exterior wall and perimeter fencing shall be provided to demonstrate compliance with rezoning conditions and conformance with existing neighborhood character. 4. Please label the existing and future rights of way for all public streets, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 5. Please provide a summary of quantities of total non-viable plants, mitigation and TOS plants in a manner that makes it simple to cross check between landscape and NPP plans. 6. Please indicate the installation of a private submeter if a separate irrigation meter is not being provided. UDC Technical Standards 4-01.6.1.A.1. 7. Please add a detail to show depressed landscape areas or indicate with notes. 8. The grading plan and water harvesting plan do not meet the requirements of the water harvesting ordinance and technical standard. The plan doesn't show the effective use of run-off to supplement irrigation. a. The catchment areas must provide water to the infiltration areas. Revise the grading to direct runoff to the landscape infiltration areas to the maximum extent possible. b. Catchment areas in the water harvesting table can only count the areas that are directed to the landscape infiltration areas. c. Clearly show the areas in each catchment area and the areas of effective infiltration and water harvesting. All landscape areas should be included within infiltration areas. d. UDC section 7.6.6.C requires the use of all runoff to supplement irrigation. Show how this is attained. e. Show rooftop drainage patterns and show how they are incorporated into the water harvesting calculations. f. Water harvesting areas should be depressed between 6 and 9 inches. These areas can be counted toward first flush retention requirements. 9. Identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on water harvesting or landscape plans. 10. Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention is required and shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-manual-board-version-201511.pdf COT edits - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Detention_Retention_Manual_Tech_Standards_Amemdments.pdf 11. Grading, hydrology, and landscape plans must be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. UDC 7.6.6.C.2. The landscape, water harvesting, and grading plans must match. Grading plan has a lot of graphic conflicts and is difficult to read. 12. Retention/detention basins should be designed naturally and organically, whenever practicable. Square and rectangles are not organic shapes. 13. The basin floor requires something other than bare dirt, hydroseed or rock larger than 4” is acceptable. 14. The monitor is responsible for an assessment of the condition of the site’s plants one year after the final inspection has been performed on the site. The monitor shall visit the site and prepare a report on plant status, including general plant condition, the identification of plants under stress and the appropriate method to relieve the stress, and recommendations for replacement of plants that are dead or dying. Dead or dying plants must be replaced with the same size plant at a one-to-one ratio of like genus and species. Copies of the report must be submitted to the site owner/developer and to PDSD. The owner must respond to the plant needs as outlined in the status report within six months of report submittal or within a shorter period if required to improve the health of stressed plants and prevent plant loss. 15. Please note that smaller caliper trees can used for TOS and may be counted towards larger caliper tree quantities or mitigation plants. 16. Please identify the project monitor prior to any grading activities, UDC 7.7.5. On-monitoring of all aspects of site clearing, grading, plant protection, preservation, salvage, and mitigation must be provided during project construction at the expense of the developer for all residential development that is over five acres and for all commercial and industrial development that is over one acre . The monitoring must be performed by an individual who is qualified in arid lands native plant resource identification and protection as specified in UDC Section 7.7.4.D, Professional Expertise. The monitor must provide periodic progress reports to the developer outlining the status of work accomplished and any problems encountered. A copy of these reports must be submitted to the PDSD for the project file. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/22/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide a dimension showing that there is enough space between the fence and the trash enclosure for the one way lane. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/27/2022 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | REVIEW | Approved | Email from: Eric Latto To: CDRC Wed 7/27/2022 2:26 PM We have a stop at Drexel/Campbell. The building setback looks fine. The plans are also calling for a new bike lane. It looks like the construction will impact the stop while the storage is being built, but there is no egress near the stop after construction so I don’t see any problems. Eric Latto City of Tucson Transit |
| 07/29/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Jeffrey Stanley Fri 7/29/2022 11:56 AM REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP22-0099 Site/Floodplain - A-Family, Drexel/Campbell. Self-storage facility. (re-approval of previous permit DP14-0098). 2000 E DREXEL RD Fee Balance: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. Title your SECOND submittal documents accordingly, example: 2_Comment Response Letter 3. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL to Filedrop: - Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) - Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) - Any other documents requested by review staff FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - "Existing Application" - "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff) - Select "PLANS" for all documents Sharon Beasley, Certified Permit Technician City of Tucson, Planning & Development Services Dept. Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (for development packages, land splits, Thursday Presubmittal meetings) Email: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov (for building permits) |
| 07/29/2022 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | DP22-0099 Comments: 1. This development is going to require a PIA. 2. Connect new sidewalk to existing sidewalk over the box culvert at south end of the development on Campbell Ave. 3. All existing concrete curb to remain, protect in place. Any existing concrete curb excessively damaged, or out of spec, replace with new P.A.G. standard 209 concrete curb. 4. Remove and replace existing curb access ramp on the corner of Drexel Rd/ Campbell Ave with new P.A.G. standard 207 curb access ramp- either Type 1 sheet 1 of 10 or Type 1- sheet 2 of 10. 5. Protect in place existing streetlights and traffic signal poles. 6. Existing catch basin on Drexel Rd, protect in place. 7. Existing regulatory/ warning signs protect in place or relocate appropriately. 8. Longitudinal tapers in sidewalk not to exceed 3:1 in transition. 9. 3 Ft. minimum buffer between curb and sidewalk. David Stiffey DTM Project Coordinator David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |