Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Active
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP22-0094
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Active
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/13/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/13/2022 | ANY | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Active | |
| 10/19/2022 | PAUL CAMARENA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Chase Bank – Covered Parking W/Solar 3939 N Oracle Rd Development Package (2nd Review) DP22-0094 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 19, 2022 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings and a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is April 10, 2023. COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS These comments are still applicable 1. COMMENT: 2-06.2.4 – Provide a single multi-page pdf file of the proposed development package (DP). The 24 page submittal was not review as a DP as this submittal is a building review set. The following comments are based on two (2) individual drawings submitted, addition comments maybe forth coming once a completer DP is submitted. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.3.7 - A small, project-location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet. The location map shall meet the requirements listed in comments 6-9. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – Provide an index of only the sheets submitted as the DP. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – Provide the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) on all sheets of the DP 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0094, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three-inch equals one mile, and provide the following information 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.A – Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area; 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and, 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding Oracle & Roger shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Clearly show the required 1’-0” setback from the proposed shade structures to the PAALs, see UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.a.(1). 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage and height of the shade structures within the footprint of the shade structure. ***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Paul Camarena at (520)837-4986 or by email Paul.Camarena@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |