Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - DP22-0081
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/20/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: La Estancia Parcel 6 – Grading Only Development Package (1st Review) DP22-0081 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 20, 2022 DUE DATE: May 05, 2022 The Zoning Review Section conditionally approves the grading plan for this project. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised grading plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0080, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nocholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 04/21/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Sheet 1 1. Please match the side slope labels in the legend to the style on the plans. 2. The existing fence line in the legend appears very similar to the boundary line. Please differentiate. 3. Provide adjacent parcel information to the west on the key map. 4. The 100-yr flood inundation limit is shown within the legend, but I do not see the line in plan view. Please verify. 5. The plans shall include the dates of the soils engineering and engineering geology reports together with the names, addresses and phone numbers of the firms or individuals who prepared the reports. 6. Provide appropriate erosion control measures. 7. Centerline monument symbol is missing from the legend, please provide. 8. Please add squiggly flow arrows to the legend, as well as all other symbols used. 9. Please remove any line types not used within this plan set from the legend. 10. In the key map, some of the basins to the east of the project appear to be proposed by the dark line weight of their contours, but do not appear to be on the plan sheets. Please show these basins in gray scale if they are existing or future. 11. The limit lines in the key map seem to exclude lots 26 and 27. Please revise accordingly. 12. Please provide disturbed area in both SF and acres and ensure site data area matches the 19 ac shown on sheet 2 note 2. 13. Please use legend from Parcel 6 as it is more comprehensive and accurate. Apply all comments shown on Parcel 6. 14. All effort should be given towards matching the comments shown on all other adjacent parcels and offsite grading plan submittals. 15. Please add "SSL, RSL" to the abbreviations list. 16. Please add reference number DP22-0081 to each sheet. Sheet 2 17. Please identify all common areas in plan view. 18. General Note #2: Please provide gross area in both SF and acres. Sheet 3 19. Label storm drain lengths, sizes, slopes, inverts and rim elevations. If this information is provided as part of a separate plan, call out reference to that plan set. 20. Will cross-gutters be needed at intersections? If so please show symbols and detail as needed. If not, please clearly show flow patterns at intersections as to not cross the street. (typ) 21. There is a low point created by street crown at the southeast curb return for E. Paseo Alga and S. Avenida Obelo. Please demonstrate drainage pattern. (typ) 22. Lots 47-51 appear to be susceptible to run on from existing grades to the west. Please show how run-on is diverted away from buildings in this area. 23. Screened back beneath lots 47-53, there appears to be a roadway. Please identify the purpose and intent of this line work. 24. Please identify high points and low points (typ) 25. For all proposed basins, please label, WSEL limit, proposed top and bottom elevation, volume and flow rate. 26. Please include all lot dimensions. Sheet 4 27. Please reference offsite grading plans, rather than improvement plans. 28. Please show existing flow arrows on all adjacent streets (typ). At the intersection of E. Camino Boleadoras and S. Paseo Monte Dr Oro, is a cross-gutter needed to direct existing flows? (typ for all connections to existing streets) 29. Please revise bold line work within the Key Map. (typ) Sheet 5 30. Near station 17+00 on S. Paseo Monte De Oro, the east curb line appears to have a low point. Show how drainage is conveyed from there. Is a cross gutter in the intersection needed? 31. Near station 14+00 on S. Paseo Monte De Oro, there appears to be a scupper at the west curb, directing flows into the basin. Please call out all scuppers and detail as needed. (typ) Additionally, show how flows along the east curb line are directed into the basin (the street crown would cause ponding at the eastern curbs low point). 32. The grading of basin VIII is noted to be by others. Please clearly delineate between grading proposed per this plan and per others by thinning the line weight of the contours per other plans. 33. Please differentiate all label styles denoting grading on future plans from those purposed per this plan (typ). Near lot 8, it is hard to tell which areas are to be constructed per this plan. Sheet 6 34. Please leave 3"x5" blank space adjacent to the title block on all sheets for approval stamps. (typ) 35. Please show on the Typical Finish Lot Grading Detail, a minimum slope away from buildings of 1%. 36. For all retaining walls, call out per standard plan or provide detail for construction. 37. Please provide height for step in garage. 38. Please provide section D-D as referenced in typical finish lot grading detail. 39. Please provide esmt for grading outside of property. (Section C10) Review and Comments provided by third party engineer reviewers under contract with the City of Tucson. For Questions or Concerns contact: Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/08/2022 | AWARNER1 | NPPO | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: La Estancia ACTIVITY NO: DP22-0081 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 8, 2022 DUE DATE: May 5, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. The monitor is responsible for an assessment of the condition of the site's plants one year after the final inspection has been performed on the site. The monitor shall visit the site and prepare a report on plant status, including general plant condition, the identification of plants under stress and the appropriate method to relieve the stress, and recommendations for replacement of plants that are dead or dying. Dead or dying plants must be replaced with the same size plant at a one-to-one ratio of like genus and species. Copies of the report must be submitted to the site owner/developer and to PDSD. The owner must respond to the plant needs as outlined in the status report within six months of report submittal or within a shorter period if required to improve the health of stressed plants and prevent plant loss. 2. Please identify the project monitor prior to any grading activities, UDC 7.7.5. On-monitoring of all aspects of site clearing, grading, plant protection, preservation, salvage, and mitigation must be provided during project construction at the expense of the developer for all residential development that is over five acres and for all commercial and industrial development that is over one acre . The monitoring must be performed by an individual who is qualified in arid lands native plant resource identification and protection as specified in UDC Section 7.7.4.D, Professional Expertise. The monitor must provide periodic progress reports to the developer outlining the status of work accomplished and any problems encountered. A copy of these reports must be submitted to the PDSD for the project file. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/16/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | WRITE DECISION LETTER | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Andie Hemmah Thu 6/16/2022 11:48 AM REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP22-0081 Project Description: Grading - La Estancia, Parcel 6, Lots 1 thru 107. 6670 E CAMINO BOLEADORAS Fee Balance: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. Title your SECOND submittal documents accordingly, example: 2_Comment Response Letter 3. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL to Filedrop: - Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) - Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) - Any other documents requested by review staff - FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - "Existing Application" - "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff) - Select "PLANS" for all documents Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Certified Building Technician City of Tucson, Planning & Development Services Dept. Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (for development packages, land splits, Thursday Presubmittal meetings) Email: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov (for building permits) |