Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP22-0074
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/10/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/10/2022 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 05/10/2022 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 05/10/2022 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 06/02/2022 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | See in "documents" section of PRO: 'TEP letter of approval" and "TEP map". |
| 06/07/2022 | DSTIFFE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | This project needs to be constructed under a PIA (Private Improvement Agreement.) Please see this website, https://www.tucsonaz.gov/tdot/private-improvement-agreement David Stiffey David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/07/2022 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approved | Approved. View the letter in the DOCUMENTS section of PRO, titled: "Tucson Airport Authority, letter of approval" |
| 06/08/2022 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | Email from: Howard Dutt To: CDRC Wed 6/8/2022 2:27 PM No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard Dutt, RLA Project Manager/Landscape Architect Parks and Recreation | City of Tucson Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov main 520.631.2030 |
| 06/14/2022 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Email from: Jay Gomes <jgomes@azdot.gov> To: CDRC Mon 6/13/2022 3:32 PM We have reviewed the TIA for the QT and did not have any comments which would cause a need for a resubmittal, thus it is acceptable. |
| 08/03/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The maximum distance between cleanouts for the building sewer shall be 100-feet, measured along the developed pipe length from the upstream entrance of the cleanout. Reference: Section 708.1.1, IPC 2018. |
| 08/03/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: QuickTrip No. 1499 Development Package (1st Review) DP22-0074 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 3, 2022 DUE DATE: August 6, 2022 COMMENT: Resubmit revised drawings and a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is May 10, 2023. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – Provide the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) on all sheets. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0074, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the following case numbers, DP21-0281 & S22-032, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.B – Label Valencia Crossing Dr on the location map. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.6 – Provide a reduced-scale map of the PAD on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – Revise General Note 13 to include Gateway Corridor Zone (GCZ) UDC Section 5.5 & Airport Environs Zone (AEZ) UDC Section 5.6. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – Per PAD-21 Section III.N provide approved documentation that the required design review has been completed. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Remove all references to “FLOOR AREA RATIO” as it is not applicable to this project, see PAD-21 III.C. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – There is an existing 10' SLOPE EASEMENT SEQ 20122220449 that runs along Valencia Rd that is not shown on the plan. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Dimension the location of the curbs & sidewalks and provide the sidewalk width for both streets. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F – Provide the zoning for the parcels south of Valiance Rd. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – It is not clear if the vehicle parking space calculation includes the outdoor seating area, and is required to, see UDC Article 7.4.3.F.4. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Based on the square footage provided, 7,318, the vehicle parking space required number, 25, is not correct, see UDC Article 7.4.3.G. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The reference to “(PER ADA S.A.D. 208.2)” for the handicap parking is not correct. The required number of accessible parking space shall be based on the 2018 IBC Chapter 11, Table 1106.1. Also, the calculation states “2 PROVIDED” and there are 3 shown on the plan. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – It is not clear if the bicycle parking space calculation includes the outdoor seating area, and is required to, see UDC Article 7.4.3.F.4. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Cleary demonstrate on detail L11, sheet C500 how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.e, 7.4.9.B.2.b, .f and that the requirements of 7.4.9.B.2.g is maintained to the proposed tables and bollards. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.I – The proposed right-of-way dedication called out on the plan will need to be completed prior to approval of this DP. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.L - There are numerous proposed easements shown on the plan that do not match what is shown on final plat S22-032. Once the final plat is recorded provided the recordation information for all easements shown :PER FINAL PLAT”. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The street perimeter yard setbacks listed under the “DEVELOMENT STANDARDS TABLE” are not correct. As both Valencia Rd & Valencia Crossing Dr are considered Arterial, PAD-21 Section III.C.6 the street perimeter yard setback shall be based on UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 & Table 6.4.5.C-1. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – The allowed height listed under the “DEVELOMENT STANDARDS TABLE” is not correct. Review PAD-21 Table III.C. Also, as this site is located within the Davis Monthan AFB, Airport Hazard District (AHD) provide an allowed and proposed height based on UDC Article 5.6.11. The more restrictive of allowed heights will prevail. 21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Clearly demonstrate on the plan how the requirements of TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A are met. 22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Demonstrate on the plan that the requirements of TSM Section 7-01.3.3.B & T-7-01.4.1.D are met to the proposed building to the dumpster enclosure. 23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also provide a general note stating that all signs require separate permits. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 08/04/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Quik Trip ACTIVITY NO: DP22-0074 Address: 5115 E Valencia Rd Zoning: PAD-21 Existing Use: partially disturbed vacant lant Proposed Use: Gas Station, Retail TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 4, 2022 DUE DATE: June 6, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 1. The basin floors require something other than bare dirt or d.g., hydroseed or rock larger than 4” is acceptable. 2. Please label the existing and future rights of way for all public streets, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 3. Revise specifically parking areas west of the building, as well as the east parking area. Placing trees along the edge of a parking area or at the ends of parking row does not meet the intent of the UDC. All spaces within 40’ of a tree is only one of the requirements, and it is required to meet all. The intent is to provide as much shade on the asphalt as possible, and the requirement is 1 tree per 4 parking spaces; trees are expected to be placed within the parking area itself to mitigate the heat and glare radiated by the built environment, UDC 7.6.1.A.3. Trees are to be distributed evenly throughout the parking area, UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a., UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2. 4. Please screen back landscape layer so irrigation components are clearer. 5. Please indicate the installation of a private submeter if a separate irrigation meter is not being provided. UDC Technical Standards 4-01.6.1.A.1. 6. Identify the type of irrigation controller with soil moisture gauge, tensiometer, weather station and/or evaportranspiration data. UDC Tech Standards 4-01.4.A. 7. Provide a detail to show tree planting with root barrier adjacent to walkways. 8. L11 Detail doesn’t show water harvesting, please revise. 9. The monitor is responsible for an assessment of the condition of the site’s plants one year after the final inspection has been performed on the site. The monitor shall visit the site and prepare a report on plant status, including general plant condition, the identification of plants under stress and the appropriate method to relieve the stress, and recommendations for replacement of plants that are dead or dying. Dead or dying plants must be replaced with the same size plant at a one-to-one ratio of like genus and species. Copies of the report must be submitted to the site owner/developer and to PDSD. The owner must respond to the plant needs as outlined in the status report within six months of report submittal or within a shorter period if required to improve the health of stressed plants and prevent plant loss. 10. Please identify the project monitor prior to any grading activities, UDC 7.7.5. On-monitoring of all aspects of site clearing, grading, plant protection, preservation, salvage, and mitigation must be provided during project construction at the expense of the developer for all residential development that is over five acres and for all commercial and industrial development that is over one acre . The monitoring must be performed by an individual who is qualified in arid lands native plant resource identification and protection as specified in UDC Section 7.7.4.D, Professional Expertise. The monitor must provide periodic progress reports to the developer outlining the status of work accomplished and any problems encountered. A copy of these reports must be submitted to the PDSD for the project file. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/08/2022 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | Existing and new Fire hydrant locations shall be shown on the development plan IFC 2018, Chapter 5, Section 507.5 All structures shall be within 400' as the hose lays of a fire hydrant and or a fire sprinkler system shall be installed Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033 Fire Plans Examiner |
| 08/09/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Show the complete pedestrian circulation path, including from the building out to E Valencia Rd and to the trash enclosures. 2. The trash enclosure detail needs to match section 8 of the Technical Standards Manual or a TSMR (Technical Standards Modification Request) will be needed and approved by Environmental Services. 3. In the drainage report it calls out the soil bed of the detention/retention basins to be consisting of wash material. Please clarify what wash material is. Suitable ground cover standards can be found in the Retention/Detention manual section 4.6 and in the UDC section 7.6.4.E. 4. Please show how the required/achieved first flush volumes were calculated. See tables 2.2 and 2.3 of the retention/detention manual for examples. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/19/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Linda Thompson 08/19/2022 REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP22-0074 Site/Grading/Swppp - QuikTrip Store # 1499. Retail sales, gas station. 5115 E VALENCIA RD FEE BALANCE: $ 9,796.92 Please pay at a minimum, the REVIEW category fees. A payment is required before your next submittal. ONLINE PAYMENTS ** If the online amount doesn't match "Fee Balance" shown above, check back in a few hours ** https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this field blank 4- "Continue" 5- In the Pay column - check the boxes 6- "Continue" YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. Title your SECOND submittal documents accordingly, example: 2_Comment Response Letter 3. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL to Filedrop: - Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) - Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) - Any other documents requested by review staff FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - "Existing Application" - "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff) - Select "PLANS" for all documents Sharon Beasley, Certified Permit Technician City of Tucson, Planning & Development Services Dept. Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (for development packages, land splits, Thursday Presubmittal meetings) Email: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov (for building permits) |
| 08/19/2022 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Needs Review | |
| 08/19/2022 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | Needs Review |