Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP22-0070
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/07/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/15/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Nava Pool Plastering Development Package (1st Review) DP22-0070 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 15, 2022 DUE DATE: April 22, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is March 23, 2023 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – Provide the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) within the title block on all sheets. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0070, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.2 – Revise Site Note 1 to include the acreage. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Revise Site Note 3 to include the existing use. Also review UDC TABLE 4.8-4: PERMITTED USES - COMMERCIAL AND MIXIED USE ZONES, C-2 Zone, and provide the applicable Use Specific Standards. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Site Note 3 references “(ROOFING CONTRACTORS YARD)” but the title block references pool plastering, which is correct? 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Per Use Specific Standard 4.9.13.P The land uses in the Commercial Services (except Automotive Service and Repair, Day Care Use; Medical Service, Extended Health Care; Transportation Services, Land Carrier; and Travelers’ Accommodation, Lodging) Industrial, Restricted Adult Activities, and Wholesaling Use Groups shall be conducted entirely within an enclosed building unless modified by Use Specific Standards. That said no outdoor storage of equipment or supplies is allowed. The proposed ramada does not meet the requirements of an enclosed building. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - Revise Site Note 23 to include “UDC ARTICLE 5.5 GATEWAY CORRIFOR ZONE (GCR) & ARTICLE 5.6 AIRPOT ENVIRONS ZONE (AEZ)”. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As this site is located within the Airport Hazard District for DMAFB, UDC Article 5.6.11 provide a height for the proposed structures based on the Median Sea Level elevation at the end of runway SE. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – Clearly demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Article 5.6.8.A.1 are met. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Site Note 5 references 1040 SF, Site Note 20 references 3,214 SF and the Parking Calculation references 2,864, which square footage is correct. Also, why are your referencing the square footage in three (3) places? 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide the following information for Alvernon Way: right-of-way width, dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F – The zoning, R-1, listed for the parcels to the east is not correct and should be R-3. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – As it appears that vehicles are going to be allowed in the area south of the proposed parking area demonstrate how dust control is done. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – It is not clear if gates are proposed for the entrances off of Alvernon Way. If gates are proposed as Alvernon is designated as a Arterial on the COT MS&R Map clearly demonstrate that if the gates are closed and a vehicle attempts to access the site that the vehicle can turn around on site with out having to back out onto Alvernon Way. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Until comment 8 is addressed vehicle parking requirements cannot be verified. Additional comments may be forth coming. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a detail for a standard vehicle parking space. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Detail 3 sheet 2 does not match what is shown on the development plan and some of the dimensions contradict what is shown on the plan. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Detail 1 sheet 2 provide a mounting height for the proposed sign. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Until comment 8 is addressed bicycle parking requirements cannot be verified. Additional comments may be forth coming. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a detail for both the short- & long-term bicycle parking that clearly demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9 are met. 21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – As no building heights were provided Zoning cannot verify perimeter yard setback requirements. 22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The setback listed for this site to the R-1 Zone is not correct. Per UDC TABLE 6.3-4.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE C-1, C-2, C-3, OCR-1, & OCR-2 ZONES, C-2 Zone, Nonres Use to Res Zone the required perimeter yard setback is 1 ½ times the height of the proposed exterior building wall. 23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Provide street perimeter yard setback dimensions for the Ramada & Material & Vehicle Storage structures to the back of future curb along Alvernon Way. 24. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 25. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.3.3.B provide the required sidewalk to the proposed office building. 26. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also, provide a general note stating all signs require separate permits. 27. COMMENT: - There are numerous bolded keynote call outs that are very difficult to read. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nocholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 04/20/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Verify that the Department of Transportation and Mobility for the City of Tucson will allow the building sewer to be located within the alley way. 2. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (5591-03) and the first-floor elevation of building C. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 04/26/2022 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Hydrants shall be shown to meet the IFC 2018, Section 507.5. Provide diagram as the hose lays not the crow flies from the hydrant to the furthest part of the building on the DP. Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033 Fire Plans Examiner |
| 05/09/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: ACTIVITY NO: DP22-0070 Address: 2149 S Alvernon Way Zoning: I-1 Existing Use: graded, vacant land Proposed Use: Contractor’s yard TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 9, 2022 DUE DATE: April 22, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 2. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 3. Please provide all landscape calculations on the landscape plan, including required trees for the parking areas, Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.A.2.c and landscape borders, UDC Technical Standards 2-10.4.2.f & g. 4. Please label the existing and future rights of way for all adjacent public streets, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 5. Placing trees along the edge of a parking area or at the ends of parking row does not meet the intent of the UDC. All spaces within 40’ of a tree is only one of the requirements, and it is required to meet all. The intent is to provide as much shade on the asphalt as possible, and the requirement is 1 tree per 4 parking spaces; trees are expected to be placed within the parking area itself to mitigate the heat and glare radiated by the built environment, UDC 7.6.1.A.3. Trees are to be distributed evenly throughout the parking area, UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a., UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2. 6. An irrigation plan and specifications are required per UDC Administration Manual 2-10.4.2.C and Technical Standards Manual Section 4-01.4.2, Irrigation Standards. 7. Please add/call out soil moisture gauge/tensiometers and rain shut-off device on irrigation plans and details. UDC Tech Standards 4.01-2.A. 8. Please indicate the installation of a private submeter if a separate irrigation meter is not being provided. UDC Technical Standards 4-01.6.1.A.1. 9. Please add a detail to show depressed landscape areas or indicate with notes. 10. Per Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.D, provide page/detail reference to civil drawings/details that show bike racks, walkways, and screening/retaining walls on landscape plans. See civil drawing is not sufficient. 11. Provide a detail to show tree planting with root barrier adjacent to walkways. 12. Provide a maintenance schedule for the landscape and irrigation for this project. UDC 2-10-4.2.A.4., please be specific. 13. A Commercial Rainwater Harvesting plan is required. Multi-family projects are commercial developments. UDC Technical Standards Manual – Section 4-01.0.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening. 14. Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention is required and shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-manual-board-version-201511.pdf COT edits - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Detention_Retention_Manual_Tech_Standards_Amemdments.pdf 15. Grading, hydrology, and landscape plans must be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. UDC 7.6.6.C.2. The landscape, water harvesting, and grading plans must match. 16. Identify the point of drainage off roof areas, amount of flow, and disposition of flow. 17. Identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on water harvesting or landscape plans. 18. Indicate basin inlets/outlets on both landscape and water harvesting plans. Provide spot elevations. 19. Retention/detention basins should be designed naturally and organically, whenever practicable. Square and rectangles are not organic shapes. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/07/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Clean up keynotes and labels, including overlapping text and font styles and sizes that are hard to read. Review and revise the keynotes as well to correct any conflicting information (ie keynote 15 is labeled as SVT of near 20' x 185' and far 20' x 110' and different dimensions are shown on the site plan). 2. Include a clear space dimension from the bottom of the Disabled Parking Sign to the ground of 84". 3. Show a pedestrian circulation path from the proposed manufactured office building to the parking lot that also connects to the adjacent street. 4. With the southern vehicle access drive show that surfacing requirements are met for the vehicle use area south of the paved parking lot. 5. Provide screening for the roll out trash containers. 6. The site is in a balanced basin. Balanced basin detention and first flush retention are required. The newly adopted Detention/Retention Manual can be found: https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-final-201406-manual.pdf With edits to the manual found: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Detention_Retention_Manual_Tech_Standards_Amemdments.pdf 7. Provide complete discussion, calculations and exhibits to establish accomplishment of first flush requirements. For calculations supporting first-flush retention provide a table accounting for the entire project area and applicable volumes. See the examples on pages 12 and 13 of the Detention/Retention Manual. 8. Show how water harvesting is being maximized with depressed landscaped areas and curb cuts to allow water into the depressed landscape areas. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/12/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | email from: COTDSDPermits to: Frank Rendon Tue 7/12/2022 9:39 AM REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP22-0070 Site/Grading - Nava Pool Plastering. Construction yard / storage yard. 2149 S ALVERNON WY Fee Balance: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. Title your SECOND submittal documents accordingly, example: 2_Comment Response Letter 3. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL to Filedrop: - Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) - Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) - Any other documents requested by review staff FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - "Existing Application" - "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff) - Select "PLANS" for all documents Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Certified Building Technician City of Tucson, Planning & Development Services Dept. Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (for development packages, land splits, Thursday Presubmittal meetings) Email: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov (for building permits) |