Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: DP22-0038
Parcel: 140360180

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - DP22-0038
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/23/2022 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
08/23/2022 SBEASLE1 UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved (View in the DOCUMENTS section of PRO, titled : "Tucson Electric Power, facilities map, 08.05.22")


Email from: TEP-DEVREV <TEPDEVREV@tep.com>
To: CDRC
Date: Friday, August 5, 2022, 2:00 PM

Tucson Electric Power Co., (TEP) has reviewed and has no objection to plat submitted July 8th, 2022.

Costs for removing or relocating existing TEP facilities will be billable to the developer. There are existing TEP facilities within the boundaries of the plat.

Tucson Electric Power Co.
Land Resources Department
08/23/2022 SBEASLE1 COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Reqs Change Email from: Gregory Orsini
To: CDRC
07/26/2022

DTM Traffic Comments:

- Private improvements cannot be constructed without mitigation, since this would result in failing operations at the Valencia traffic interchange (TI), which could then spill back and impact adjacent City intersections

- Increase the WB Valencia Rd right turn lane storage length at the TI

- Create a dual left turn for the I-10 WB offramp (the movement identified in the TIA as "NBLT")

- Please resubmit TIA with revised traffic analysis and LOS results with these additional improvements (and any others necessary to ensure that in future conditions intersections operate at LOS D or better and movements operate within the realm of acceptability)

Thank you.

Gregory Orsini
Traffic Engineering Manager
City of Tucson, Transportation and Mobility
08/23/2022 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT: Grand Peaks Apartments
Development Package (2nd Review)
DP22-0038

TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 25, 2022

DUE DATE: July 29, 2022

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is February 24, 2023

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

1. Zoning acknowledges that final plat S22-0032 was submitted and the 1st review was completed but until recorded zoning cannot approve this DP. Provide the plat case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets of this DP. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A – It appears that some type of land split/plat is proposed. Clarify what is proposed and what ever process will need to be completed prior to approval of this DP.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nocholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov.

To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
08/23/2022 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Reqs Change View the letter in DOCUMENTS section of PRO, titled "ADOT review comments, second submittal, 07.25.22"
08/23/2022 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change The revised private utility plans show three lots that will require backwater valves. The FFE for lots 24, 46, and 49 are less than 12" above the rim elevation of the next upstream manhole. [Initial comment: Where the finish floor elevation is less than 12 inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole in the public sewer or private sewer collection system, a backwater valve shall be installed in the building drain or branch of the building drain serving that floor. Floors discharging from above that reference point shall not discharge through the backwater valve. Determine the need for a backwater valve for each building. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson.]
08/23/2022 AWARNER1 LANDSCAPE REVIEW Passed
08/23/2022 JPEELDA1 FIRE REVIEW Approved
08/23/2022 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY Approved July 29, 2022

RE: DP22-0038 / Site/Grading/SWPPP - Grand Peaks Apartments, 2nd Submittal, Received July 8, 2022

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP22-0038 / Site/Grading/SWPPP - Grand Peaks Apartments; 2
nd Submittal, a development package application of a 23.8 acre site located west of the intersection of East Valencia Road and East Littletown Road. The property is zoned
Planned Area Development 21 (PAD-21), with the proposed development containing new multifamily residential uses.

This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace.

The Tucson Airport Authority approves the 2nd submittal of this project and has no additional comments to provide.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811.

Respectfully,
Scott Robidoux, C.M., Manager of Planning
Tucson Airport Authority
08/23/2022 SBEASLE1 PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING Approved Email from: Nicholas Jordan <Nicholas.Jordan@pima.gov>
To: CDRC
Mon 8/1/2022 3:39 PM

Pima County Addressing approves DP22-0038, Grand Peaks, 2nd submittal.
Thank you

Nicholas Jordan
Site Review Project Manager - Addressing Official

Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-9623
08/29/2022 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change EMAIL FROM: COTDSDPermits
To: Tri Miller
08/29/2022

REVIEW NOTICE

Returned for Corrections: DP22-0038
Site/Grading/Swppp - Grand Peaks Apartments.
5125 E VALENCIA CROSSING DR

Fee Balance: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment.

YOUR NEXT STEPS
1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro
- Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number
- Permits - click on blue tab
- Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS
- Documents section - click on VIEW

2. Title your THIRD submittal documents accordingly, example: 3_Comment Response Letter

3. UPLOAD documents to Filedrop:
- Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments)
- Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made)
- Documents requested by review staff

FILEDROP
https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp
- "Existing Application"
- "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff)


Sharon Beasley, Certified Permit Technician

City of Tucson, Planning & Development Services Dept.
Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov
(for development packages, land splits, Thursday Presubmittal meetings)
Email: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov
(for building permits)
08/29/2022 JGARCIA9 ENGINEERING REVIEW Needs Review 1. Revised plans page 8/48. Traffic ciricle must meet Tucson TSM Section 8 figure 6 for service vehicle access. Show emergency vehicle access on north and south neighborhoods with turning raidus clearly identified.
2. Revised plans page 8/48. South and east of traffic circle needs continuous pedestian path to all parking. Is called out with (7) but no drawing.
3.Concrete paving detail C/23 does not comply with TSM 8-01.5.2.H (needs #4 rebar not welded wire fabric)

Faffs Riederer
matthew.riederer@tucsonaz.gov