Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP22-0034
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/07/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/07/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed | Engineering was passed by Loren Makus during the OK to Submit. No review required. |
| 03/14/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: The Crossing On Roger – Apartment Density Expansion Development Package (1st Review) DP22-0034 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 14, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is February 20, 2023 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) shall be provided within the title block 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0034, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – The section, township, and range and section corners shall be labeled on the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Provide the applicable Use Specific Standards, 4.9.7.B.6, adjacent to the proposed use. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As Roger Road is designated as a Collector of the COT MS&R Map provide a general note stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R)”. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide the following information for all adjacent streets: right-of-way width, dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Per UDC Article 7.4.6.K Use of Street or Alley for Maneuvering Area: A street or alley cannot be used for maneuvering directly into or from any parking space located wholly or partially outside the public right-of-way. That said this site is considered non-conforming for vehicle parking. Any expansions of density require that the site be brought to code for the vehicle parking. A Board of Adjustment for Variance will need to be approved for use of the vehicle parking spaces that back out directly onto Roger and the alleys to count for the required number of vehicle parking spaces. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. The number of spaces shown under proposed should for the studio should be 2 and for the 1B should be 5 for a total of 110. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – - Provide the square footage and the height of each building within the footprint. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nocholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 03/16/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 03/23/2022 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/29/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Ron Deitrick Fri 4/29/2022 11:54 AM REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP22-0034 DESCRIPTION: Site - The Crossings on Roger. Convert existing interior space from storage rooms into dwelling units. 1201 W ROGER RD FEE BALANCE: $ 346.50 Please pay at a minimum, the REVIEW category fees. A payment is required before your next submittal. ONLINE PAYMENTS ** If amount doesn't match "Fee Balance", check back in a few hours ** https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this field blank 4- "Continue" 5- In the Pay column - check the boxes 6- "Continue" YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. Title your SECOND submittal documents accordingly, example: 2_Comment Response Letter 3. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL to Filedrop: - Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) - Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) - Any other documents requested by review staff - FILEDROP: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - "Existing Application" - "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff) - Select "PLANS" for all documents Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Certified Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov |
| 04/29/2022 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | Needs Review |