Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP22-0027
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
02/18/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
02/18/2022 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
02/18/2022 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
02/18/2022 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
02/22/2022 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Email from: Jeremy Moore <jmoore3@azdot.gov> To: CDRC Tue 2/22/2022 11:50 AM No comments from ADOT. Thanks for the opportunity to review. Jeremy Moore, P.E., Assistant District Engineer 1221 S. 2nd Avenue Tucson, Arizona 85713 520.260.2384 www.azdot.gov |
02/28/2022 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Passed | |
03/08/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | For lots 40, 41, and 42, the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2466.90') is less than 12" below the first floor elevations. Provide for the installation of a backwater valve at these lots when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson |
03/10/2022 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | Email from: Howard Dutt To: CDRC Wed 3/9/2022 5:04 PM No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation Facilities are affected by this development. Howard Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Parks and Recreation | City of Tucson |
03/11/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Tentative Plat Package for SFR at The Bridges Lots 1 -126 Development Package (1st Review) DP22-0027 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 11, 2022 DUE DATE: March 11, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is February 15, 2023 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0027, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Revise General Note 3 to clearly indicate what type of residential product is proposed, it appears that based on the parking requirements medium density detached is proposed. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.d – Does not appear that the Bridges Tracking Table is up to date as Area “B-VI” does not include DP22-0010. Contact Elisa Hamblin for an updated excel file of the tracking table @ Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Clearly indicate the height of all proposed walls/fences on the plan. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 6. COMMENT: Provide a copy of the Design Review Committee approval letter with the next submittal, see PAD-15 Section C.6. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
03/16/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Development Package Comments: Sheet 1 1. General Note #5: Please provide area in both SF and acres Per Administrative Manual (AM) section 2.06.4.0, 4.7 General Notes. 2. Please provide contact information for Geotechnical Engineering firm who prepared soil report. 3. Please label common area next to lot # 115 and lot # 45. 4. Please provide basis of bearing and basis of elevation on the title sheet. 5. Please add abbreviation "OF" to legend ("OF" was used at the basin pipe inlet). Sheet 7 1. Please provide missing bearing and distance for lots # 121, 120, 107,106. Sheet 8 2. Lot 43: Please move overlap text and dimension. 3. Please clarify where keynote #20 being used. Sheet 9 1. Please add keynote 31 to the keynotes list. Please label keynote 21 or remove it from list if not applicable. Sheet 10 2. Please provide the missing elevations at property line for lots 95 and 96. 3. Please provide additional existing spot elevations at saw cut line main access gates on S MLK Jr Way. 4. Please label all existing contours. 5. Please provide grading information between R/W and back of lots. 6. Provide cross section for grading behind lots 73 to 96 (typ). Sheet 11 1. Please provide elevation for lot 114 at street curb. 2. Please provide elevation for lot 124 at Property Line /Street curb. 3. Basin C, Outlet 12" pipe: Call-out arrow is not pointing to joint (12" joint with 30" pipe). Please revise. 4. Please indicate permission for grading past western boundary. 5. Please add a curb access ramp at Lot 26 radii and consider adding a mid-block ramp near lots 21 to 25 Sheet 12 1. Please label new water connect to existing 10" water on E 36th St. 2. Please label new water connect to existing 12" water on S. MLK Jr. Way. 3. For clarity, please add direction flow arrow for sewer pipe for all sheets. 4. Please show existing underground electrical at the proposed entrance access on S MLK Jr. Way. Sheet 13 1. Please check slope for 29' sewer at intersection of Street E and Street G. The slope is less than 0.44% min. 2. Please verify all sewer line slopes. SWPPP Comments: 1. Pages 15-17 of the SWPPP document referred to Appendix L for BPMs details which is not the right appendix. Please revise reference for BMPs details to be Appendix M. 2. Please add all BMPs symbols to legend. (example: all storm drain inlets and "OF" use at the basins pipe inlets). 3. E 36th St: Please revise call out of 8" fiber roll to the fiber roll symbol and not the grading limit. 4. Please provide basin's capacity information (volumes, depth, Q, top and bottom elevations, WSE) for all proposed basins on this on this sheet. 5. Please callout permanent erosion protection along southeast (i.e. concrete spillways, riprap splash pads, etc. Drainage Comments: 1. Page 3 - proposed site discharge is incorrect- please revise to match the calculation. 2. Page 5 - please explain how 3.8cfs was calculated as 4580 cubic feet. 3. Page 5 - please state what elevation the rise is set at for Water Harvest Basin A. 4. Page 5 - Water Harvesting Basins B, C, and D state zero outfall though has a bleeder- confirm the volume contained in the 9" is the only volume accounted for when considering the increase in total runoff from the site due to increased impervious area from the master plan. 5. Text - please describe grate analysis used and account for clogging in a sump condition for each. 6. Page 7 - please include a discussion of the stormdrain analysis to include manning's values, boundary conditions, junction losses, etc. 7. Text- please include PAAL calculations to demonstrate capacity of each roadway segment. 8. Figure 3 - it is unclear how runoff enters each of the basins, please depict and describe in the text. 9. Figure 3 -please provide proposed contours and slopes. 10. Please provide Qin, Qout, volume retained and WSEL for each water harvesting basin. 11. Figure 3 - please provide the reginal detention basin 100-yr WSEL. 12. Water harvesting calculation sheets- please explain if the weir length used is based on the perimeter of a pipe outlet. Review and Comments provided by third party engineer reviewers under contract with the City of Tucson. For Questions or Concerns contact: Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
03/17/2022 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Reqs Change | See the "Documents" section of PRO for document titled: "Tucson Airport Authority, first submittal review comments, 03.11.22" |
03/18/2022 | DSTIFFE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | On "1_Plan Set, Tentative Plat-" Page 8, Key Note 15 calls for, "New Concrete Curb Access Ramp," at the SW corner of MLK Way/ Private Street C and also both corners at the SW and SE of 36th St./ and Private Street A. There are already existing Curb Access Ramps at these locations. These existing ramps are relatively new and in spec according to ADA standards. You may leave these in and utilize them, or remove and replace them if that better fits your plan. David Stiffey David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
03/21/2022 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
04/15/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PROJECT: Tentative Plat for The Bridges, lots 1-126 ACTIVITY NO: DP22-0017 Address: 2650 S ML King Jr Way Zoning: PAD-15 Existing Use: vacant, graded land Proposed Use: SFR TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 15, 2022 DUE DATE: April 11, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 2. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 3. Please clarify note “Existing Landscape in the Right of Way to be Coordinated”. 4. Please provide all landscape calculations on the landscape plan, including required trees for the parking areas, Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.A.2.c and landscape borders, UDC Technical Standards 2-10.4.2.f & g. 5. Please label the existing and future rights of way for all public streets, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 6. Please add a detail to show depressed landscape areas or indicate with notes. 7. Decomposed granite is prohibited in basin floors, unless 4” or greater in size. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Detention_Retention_Manual_Tech_Standards_Amemdments.pdf 8. Provide a detail to show tree planting with root barrier adjacent to walkways. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
04/26/2022 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | Email from: TEP-DEVREV <TEPDEVREV@tep.com> To: CDRC Tue 4/26/2022 8:47 AM Tucson Electric Power Co. (TEP) has reviewed, and plans received, March 11th, 2022 and has no objections at this time. Costs for removing or relocating existing TEP facilities will be billable to the developer. A Preliminary electrical design is in process. The customer is responsible for compliance with City Ordinances. Please note jurisdictional permit for any work on a public road right of way where applicable. Easements are required for TEP facilities if not appropriately recorded on the final subdivision plat. They will need to be obtained by separate instrument. Tucson Electric Power Co. Land Resources Department |
05/16/2022 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | REVIEW | Approved | Email from: Eric Latto <Eric.Latto@tucsonaz.gov> To: CDRC Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2022 I have no issues with this. Thanks, Eric Latto City of Tucson Dept of Transportation - Transit/SunTran |
06/02/2022 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | (To view the PLAN mentioned in email below, in PRO, see "Pima Co Addressing, review comments, first submittal") Email from: Nicholas Jordan <Nicholas.Jordan@pima.gov> To: CDRC Thu 6/2/2022 9:43 AM Pima County Addressing is returning DP22-0027 TP for SFR at The BridgesB-1 Lots 1-126 for corrections. Please see plan for comments. Thank you Nicholas Jordan Site Review Project Manager - Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 |
06/02/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits to: lisa bowers Thu 6/2/2022 4:12 PM REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP22-0027 DESCRIPTION: Tentative Plat - SFR at The Bridges B-1. Lots 1 thru 126, and Common Areas "A" (private streets, utilities), and "B" thru "L" (open space, drainage, utilities). Fee Balance: $0 (zero) YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. Title your SECOND submittal documents accordingly, example: 2_Comment Response Letter 3. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL to Filedrop: - Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) - Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) - Any other documents requested by review staff - FILEDROP - Might not be available https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - "Existing Application" - "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff) - Select "PLANS" for all documents Sharon Beasley, Certified Building Technician City of Tucson, Planning & Development Services Dept. Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (for development packages, land splits, Thursday Presubmittal meetings) Email: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov (for building permits and all other subjects) |