Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP22-0018
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/17/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/23/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 03/08/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: 211 S 4th Ave – Convert Residential to Bed & Breakfast and Ceremony Venue Development Package (1st Review) DP22-0018 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 8, 2022 DUE DATE: March 3, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is February 07, 2023 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.2.4 – The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Remove all references to building code review from the plan 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.3.2 – All mapped data shall be drawn at an engineering scale, the 1/8” scale shown on sheets 2 & 3 does not meet this requirement. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.B – Provide a brief legal description within the title block. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – Provide the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) on all sheets. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0018, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three-inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.A – Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area; 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and, 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.1 – Sheet 1 under “SITE INFORMATION” the zoning listed as “HR-3” is not correct and should be HC-3. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. The uses should be listed as “Travelers Accommodation, Lodging & Civic Assembly”. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As this site is located within a Historic Preservation Zone (HPZ) Historic review is required and must be approved prior to approval of this DP. Historic application/requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/Preservation/HPZ_Review_Application_Package_2020.pdf, and is a separate submittal from the building plans submitted at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd-filedrop, using Submission Type “Historic Review”. Once approved provide the Historic case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets and provide a general note stating the case number date of approval and if applicable any conditions of approval. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide the following information for both 12th St, Railroad Ave & 4th Ave. right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F – Provide the zoning for the properties north of 12th, east of Railroad and west of 4th on the plan. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. Per UDC TABLE 7.4.4-1: MINIMUM NUMBER OF MOTOR VEHICLE SPACES REQUIRED, CIVIC USE GROUP, Civic Assembly parks 1 space per 100 sq. ft. of GFA. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Clearly demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.6.B.1.b & .d are met for the proposed offsite parking. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Based on current aerial photos there is a wall along the north and east sides of the vehicle parking area. If this wall is to remain the vehicle parking space shown near the northeast corner of the site is required to be 10’-0” wide, see UDC Article 7.4.6.D.2.b. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Per UDC Article 7.4.6.K A street or alley cannot be used for maneuvering directly into or from any parking space located wholly or partially outside the public right-of-way. That said a Board of Adjustment for Variance will be required for the proposed accessible parking space. 21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Per UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines , to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. That said demonstrate on the plan how this requirement is met for the accessible parking space. 22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Demonstrate on the plan that the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.d, .e, .g, 7.4.9.B.2.a, .h, 7.4.9.C.2.c, .d are met. 23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – As the new assembly area constitutes and expansion that is greater than 25% demonstrate that the requirements TSM Section 7-01 are met. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 03/10/2022 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Plans show that all the structures will have fire sprinkler installed. Please show the location of the new fire lines and the existing fire hydrant locations. Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov TFD Fire Plans Examiner 520-837-7033 |
| 03/11/2022 | FRANK PODGORSKI | HPZ ADVISORY BOARD | HPZ ADVISORY BOARD DATE | Completed | The properties at 211 S 4th Avenue and 316 E 12th St are listed as contributors to the Armory Park Historic Preservation Zone (HPZ). Any changes to the exterior of the buildings (both historic and non-historic) or the site require review by the Armory Park Historic Zone Advisory Board and the Plans Review Subcommittee prior to the commencement of work. |
| 04/25/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: El Amador B&B ACTIVITY NO: DP22-0018 Address: 211 S 4th Ave Zoning: HC-3 Existing Use: Residential Proposed Use: Commercial venue and Travelers’ Accommodation TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 25, 2022 DUE DATE: March 3, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 2. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 3. The following two comments may be waived or modified by Historic Preservation Review. A minimum 10’ street landscape border is required adjacent to all public streets. Existing vegetation can be counted towards this requirement, and up to 5’ can be used in the public right of way for this purpose. 4. A minimum 10’ interior border is required adjacent to single family uses. 5. Please provide all landscape calculations on the landscape plan, including required trees for the parking areas, Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.A.2.c and landscape borders, UDC Technical Standards 2-10.4.2.f & g. 6. Please label the existing and future rights of way for all public streets. UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 7. Two trees are required for the parking area. Placing trees along the edge of a parking area or at the ends of parking row does not meet the intent of the UDC. All spaces within 40’ of a tree is only one of the requirements, and it is required to meet all. The intent is to provide as much shade on the asphalt as possible, and the requirement is 1 tree per 4 parking spaces; trees are expected to be placed within the parking area itself to mitigate the heat and glare radiated by the built environment, UDC 7.6.1.A.3. Trees are to be distributed evenly throughout the parking area, UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a., UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2. 8. An irrigation plan and specifications are required per UDC Administration Manual 2-10.4.2.C and Technical Standards Manual Section 4-01.4.2, Irrigation Standards. 9. Please add/call out soil moisture gauge/tensiometers and rain shut-off device on irrigation plans and details. UDC Tech Standards 4.01-2.A. 10. Please indicate the installation of a private submeter if a separate irrigation meter is not being provided. UDC Technical Standards 4-01.6.1.A.1. 11. Provide a detail to show tree planting with root barrier adjacent to walkways. 12. Provide a maintenance schedule for the landscape and irrigation for this project. UDC 2-10-4.2.A.4., please be specific. 13. A Commercial Rainwater Harvesting plan is required. Multi-family projects are commercial developments. UDC Technical Standards Manual – Section 4-01.0.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening. 14. The following comments are applicable if retention/detention is required. Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention is required and shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-manual-board-version-201511.pdf 15. Grading, hydrology, and landscape plans must be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. UDC 7.6.6.C.2. The landscape, water harvesting, and grading plans must match. 16. Identify the point of drainage off roof areas, amount of flow, and disposition of flow. 17. Identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on water harvesting or landscape plans. 18. Indicate basin inlets/outlets on both landscape and water harvesting plans. Provide spot elevations. 19. Retention/detention basins should be designed naturally and organically, whenever practicable. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/05/2022 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The vehicle use area must be paved. Show limits of vehicle use area including the required backup spur. 2. Show barriers to keep vehicles within the vehicle use area. 3. Show drainage patterns for the entire site. Show how water harvesting will be maximized. 4. Show roof drainage locations and show how the sidewalks will be kept flood free. 5. Provide a complete solid waste capacity calculation per Technical Standard 8-01. 6. Show storage and service locations for the solid waste containers. Loren Makus loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/06/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Rachel Fri 5/6/2022 4:26 PM REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP22-0018 DESCRIPTION: Site - El Amador- Boren. Change of use from residence to bed and breakfast, and special event venue. 211 S 4TH AV Fee Balance: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. Title your SECOND submittal documents accordingly, example: 2_Comment Response Letter 3. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL to Filedrop: - Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) - Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) - Any other documents requested by review staff - FILEDROP: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - "Existing Application" - "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff) - Select "PLANS" for all documents Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Certified Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov |