Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP22-0010
Parcel: 132131130

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP22-0010
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/07/2022 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
02/07/2022 SBEASLE1 UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Passed
02/07/2022 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed
02/07/2022 SBEASLE1 UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Passed
02/07/2022 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed
02/16/2022 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved Email from: Jay Gomes <jgomes@azdot.gov>
To: CDRC
Tue 2/15/2022 3:07 PM

Thank you for the opportunity to review this item.
ADOT has no comments to provide.
02/17/2022 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies are required to be installed directly after the water meter. Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf.
2. The bottom of the Zurn Wilkins 350 AST double check detector assembly shall be 12" to 30" above grade. The assembly shall not be installed in a vault below grade. Reference: Section 303.2, IPC 2018.
02/25/2022 SBEASLE1 COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved Email from: Howard Dutt
To: CDRC
Thu 2/24/2022 10:05 AM

No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development.

Howard Dutt, RLA , Landscape Architect

Parks and Recreation | City of Tucson
Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov
main 520.631.2040
03/04/2022 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT: CAP Storage @ Tucson Marketplace
Development Package (1st Review)
DP22-0010

TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 4, 2022

DUE DATE: February 28, 2022

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is January 06, 2023

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – Provide the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) within the title block.

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0010, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three-inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.A – Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area;

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and,

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled.

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.6 – If the project is located within the boundaries of a Planned Area Development (PAD) zone, include a reduced-scale map of the PAD on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage.

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The use group & use listed under Site Data Land Use is not correct. The use group should be Storage Use Group and the use should be Personal Storage.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.d - Bridges Tracking Tables, complete area “B-IV” for this project and area “A” is not up to date. Contact Elisa Hamblin for an updated excel file of the tracking table @ Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system.

12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined.

14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Per UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. That said there does not appear to be any barrier along the north side of the access lane that provides access to the dumpster enclosure.

15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a vehicle parking space calculation that includes the number required & provided along with the number accessible vehicle parking spaces required and provided. Accessible parking requirements are based on 2018 IBC Chapter 11, Table 1106.1.

16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Relocated the accessible space shown within the building and provide it on site where it can be accessed at any time.

17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a standard and accessible vehicle parking space detail on the plan. These details shall match what is proposed on the plan.

18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Sheet C502 ADA Accessibility Signage detail provide a mounting height for he signs.

19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – There appears to be some type of fence along the west side of the western parking area. If this is a fence demonstrate how parking vehicles will be prevented from damaging the fence, see UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1.

20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a short-term bicycle parking space calculation the provided the number required and provided.

21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a short-term bicycle parking detail that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1, .2 & 7.4.9.C are met.

22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the height of the proposed building within the foot print of the building.

23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.B A sidewalk is required adjacent and parallel to any access lane or PAAL on the side where buildings are located (See Figure 1). Provide the required sidewalk along the entire east and west sides of the building.

24. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.3.3.B The areas within the development which must be connected include, but are not limited to, all buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas. Show the required sidewalk to the dumpster.

25. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Clearly demonstrate that the proposed accessible ramp that connects into the side of an existing ramp at the northeast corner of this site meets the requirements of ICC A117.1-2009 Section 406.

26. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met.

27. COMMENT: Provide a copy of the Design Review Committee approval letter with the next submittal, see PAD-15 Section C.6.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov.

To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
03/04/2022 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY Reqs Change See the "Documents" section of PRO: "Tucson Airport Authority, first submittal review comments, 02.25.22"
03/10/2022 JPEELDA1 COT NON-DSD FIRE Reqs Change The plans show the fire line entering the building on the NW corner. Confirm that the F.D.C.is compliant with IFC 2018, Section 912, 912.2.1 and located on the street side of the building not the NW corner.
Due to the structure and height you shall provide another hydrant on the SE corner of the property.
The building exceeds 30' and shall be provided with Fire Department Aerial Access , IFC 2018, Appendix D, Section D104 & Section D105.

Questions:
Jennifer Peel-Davis
Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov
TFD Fire Plans Examiner
520-837-7033
03/11/2022 DSTIFFE1 COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved No Comments from Traffic
03/14/2022 AWARNER1 LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL
TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination
FROM: Anne Warner, RLA
PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section

PROJECT: CAP Storage Bridges
ACTIVITY NO: DP22-0010
Address: 820 E Tucson Marketplace Blvd
Zoning: PAD-15
Existing Use: graded vacant land
Proposed Use: Storage facilities

TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 14, 2022
DUE DATE: February 28, 2022
COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed.
This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting.
1. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.

2. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval.

3. Delete reference to NPP on L001 if an exception letter is submitted, not relevant.

4. Please change the water harvesting basin note to “depress landscape area 6” for water harvesting”.

5. There are only 8 trees that can be counted as shading asphalt in the parking area. There could be additional trees on the west parking area. All spaces within 40’ of a tree is only one of the requirements, and it is required to meet all. The intent is to provide as much shade on the asphalt as possible, and the requirement is 1 tree per 4 parking spaces; trees are expected to be placed within the parking area itself to mitigate the heat and glare radiated by the built environment, UDC 7.6.1.A.3. Trees are to be distributed evenly throughout the parking area, UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a., UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2. Further, there may be other species that are more appropriate for shade than Palo Verde.

6. Please add/call out soil moisture gauge/tensiometers and rain shut-off device on irrigation plans and details. UDC Tech Standards 4.01-2.A.

7. Provide a detail to show tree planting with root barrier adjacent to walkways.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package

YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop
https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp
Select "Existing Application"
1) Comment Response Letter (your response to
the reviewer's Requires changes comments)
2) Plan Set (or individual sheets)
3) Any other items requested by review staff

If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov
03/16/2022 SBLOOD1 ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change Development Package Comments:
Sheet 1
1. Please include a 3" x 5" block in the lower right quadrant for the approval stamp on all sheets.
2. Provide the contact information for the Geotechnical Engineer.
3. Include a project- location map on the upper right corner with a " This Project" callout at the project location. Please follow the format requirements listed in AM 2-06.4.
4. Provide all applicable General Notes that are listed in AM 2-06.4.7.

Sheet 2
5. Please specify on each note whether the existing utilities will be removed or if they will remain in place. Be consistent with all notes.
6. Please correct spelling of activities in "Adjacent road and parking lot constructed...." note.
7. Review conducted with the assumption that adjacent activities will complete prior to this project.
8. All hatches and infrastructure not built with this package should be shaded back. Pertinent offsite infrastructure should be shaded back and labeled.

Sheet 3
9. Please provide all existing street names.
10. Use the line type that is in the legend for the property line and for the adjoining property line.
11. Please provide the site boundary perimeter information with bearings and distances.
12. Please reference the ADA ramp standard.
13. Please provide dimensions for the proposed ADA parking stalls east of the storage facility.
14. Please reference Pima Association of Governments (PAG) details or details provided on detail sheets. For example, the proposed 6-inch curb and gutter, trash enclosure, accessible stalls, and signs. https://apps.pagnet.org/standardspecifications/
15. Provide the adjacent parcel and improvement plan recording information (typ all sheets).
16. Please reference details to other sheets (trash enclosure /ADA ramps/curbing/signage)(typ)

Sheet 4
17. Please include the RD line type in the legend.
18. Please reference plan details or standard PAG details for all hood and grate inlets (typical all catch basins and applicable sheets)

Sheet 5
19. The spot elevations at the trash enclosure show drainage going back into the enclosure. Please revise and show minimum 2% slope away from the trash enclosure.
20. Provide the slope at sidewalks to verify a 2% max. cross slope and 5% max. longitudinal slope.
21. Please provide a cross section of the east and west driveways and parking lot
22. Please provide the slope on all ADA ramps to verify the max slopes.
23. Please differentiate between existing and proposed grades. Specifically the spot grades that are shown where the proposed sidewalk or curb tie into the existing.
24. Please provide spot elevations at the concrete stairs and at the landing. Provide the slope at the landing to verify the 2% max. slope in all directions.
25. Show flowlines draining common areas to grates (typical all sheets and common areas)
26. Please provide all slope ratio labels for interior and boundary grading.

Sheet 6
27. Provide invert elevations at all utility crossings.
28. Provide rim elevations and invert elevations at all sewer cleanouts.
29. Provide the length and slope of all sewer lines.
30. Provide the elevation at the drive-in floor drain tie in.
31. Provide the invert elevation at the existing sewer manhole.

Sheet 7
32. Provide inlet protection at the proposed grate east of the storage facility.

Sheet 9
33. Please convert colored linework to grayscale (typ).

Drainage Comments:
1. Text - stormwater detention requirement- please list the water harvesting requirements per the approved master plan and explain how this requirement is met.
2. Text - please include discussion of stormdrain analysis including boundary conditions, manning's values, junction losses and inlet calculations.
3. FEMA firm panel - please highlight the project site.
4. Soils map - please provide the map showing the hydrologic soil group.
5. Storm drainage map - please label proposed contour elevations, and show directional flow arrows.
6. Storm drainage map - drainage areas do not appear to cover the entire developed area. Please revise to account for all developed areas.
7. Storm sewer analysis - please provide layout view and profile for results.

Review and Comments provided by third party engineer reviewers under contract with the City of Tucson. For Questions or Concerns contact:
Stephen Blood
(520) 837-4958
Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov
04/11/2022 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Completed
04/19/2022 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change Email from: COTDSDPermits
to: lisa bowers
Tue 4/19/2022 9:49 AM

REVIEW NOTICE
Returned for Corrections: DP22-0010

DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading - CAP Bridges, indoor storage facility.

Fee Balance: $0 (zero)

YOUR NEXT STEPS
1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro
(If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.)
- Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number
- Permits - click on blue tab to see different sections
- Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS
- Documents section - click on VIEW

2. Title your SECOND submittal documents accordingly, example: 2_Comment Response Letter

3. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL to Filedrop:
1) Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments)
2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made)
3) Any other documents requested by review staff

- FILEDROP:
https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp
- "Existing Application"
- "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff)
- Select "PLANS" for all documents


Sharon Beasley, Certified Permit Specialist

City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services
Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov