Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP22-0008
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/02/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/02/2022 | MGAYOSS1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Denied | Since this project includes exterior improvements that are visible from the right-of-way, and is located within the boundaries of the Infill Incentive District - Rio Nuevo Area (RNA) overlay zone, it will need to show compliance with the RNA standards specified in the Unified Development Code (UDC) Section 5.12.7, and go through the Design Review Board (DRB) for review. Also, the site is located in the Downtown National Register, and since the project is not affecting the facade of the adjacent contributor, it will NOT need to go trough the Tucson-Pima Historical Commission's Plans Review Subcommittee (PRS) for review (UDC 5.12.7.F.4). Once the first round of comments are issued from the reviewers for the Development Package and the construction documents (T21CM08835), you can proceed with the submittal of your Design Packet for review by the DRB. So then these will be your next steps: 1. Submit and obtain the first round of comments for the Development Package and CDs; 2. E-mail me (maria.gayosso@tucsonaz.gov) the complete Design Packet, which should include the Special Districts application form (www.tucsonaz.gov/files/integrated-planning/Special_Districts_Application_Revised_9-10-21_fillable.pdf), plus all materials specified in the application form to demonstrate compliance with RNA requirements; I will look at the packet and may require additional materials and may request clarifications; 3. Once Design Packet is ready to be accepted, I'll give you instructions for payment of the $385.00 RNA/historic review fees; 4. Once fees are paid, I will then schedule the meeting for review by the DRB. Please email me if there are any questions: maria.gayosso@tucsonaz.gov. Thanks. |
| 03/02/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: US Bank ATM Kiosk – 44 E Broadway Blvd Development Package (1st Review) DP22-0008 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 2, 2022 DUE DATE: February 23, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is January 26, 2023 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.2.4 – The Development Package (DP) is for site related reviews. Remove all building code related sheets from the DP. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – Revise the drawing index to only include site related sheets. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 -Provide the email address for the owner listed on the 1st sheet. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – Provide the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx), within the title block. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0008, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – Provide the section, township, and range and label the section corners on the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The use listed under Site Plan Keynotes on sheet 3 is not correct. Commercial is a use group. The use for the bank should be Financial Service: Excluding non-chartered institutions, condos should be Excluding non-chartered institution. Review UDC TABLE 4.8-4: PERMITTED USES - COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USEZONES and provide the correct uses for all uses within the building. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As this site is located within the Downtown Core (DCS) and the Rio Nuevo Area (RNA) RNA review is required and must be approved prior to approval of this DP, see Design Review Comments. Once approved provide the RNA case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets and provide a general note stating the case number, date of approval, any modifications, and if applicable any conditions of approval. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As Broadway Blvd. is designated as a Arterial Gateway on the COT MS&R Map provide a general note stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R) & .UDC ARTICLE 5.5 GATEWAY CORRIFOR ZONE (GCR)” 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. Show the zoning for the parcels north of Broadway and south of Jackson. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation listed on sheet 3 is not correct. Either review UDC Articles 7.4.3 & 7.4.4 and provide a correct calculation or remove the calculation from the plan as no changes are proposed that effect the vehicle parking. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Per UDC Article 7.4.6.D.2.b Minimum Width Requirement When Adjacent to Barrier, a motor vehicle off-street parking space must have a minimum width of ten feet when the side(s) of the parking space abuts a vertical barrier over six inches in height, other than a vertical support for a carport. That said demonstrate that the vehicle parking space directly south of the proposed fence meets the 10’-0” wide requirement. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - The bicycle parking space calculation listed on sheet 3 is not correct. Either review UDC Article 7.4.8 and provide a correct calculation or remove the calculation from the plan as no changes are proposed that effect the bicycle parking. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Per UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 and Table 6.4.5.C-1 the required street perimeter yard setback is 21’ or H = The height of the proposed exterior building wall, greater of the two, as measured from the back of curb. As a setback dimension was not provided Zoning cannot verify the setback but it does not appear that the ATM Kiosk is meeting the required setback. This setback can be waived by the DCS review. 15. COMMENT: Remove all clouds and deltas from the plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 03/09/2022 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/11/2022 | DSTIFFE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | No Comments from Traffic |
| 03/14/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/08/2022 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/11/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Taylor Hall Mon 4/11/2022 11:35 AM REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP22-0008 DESCRIPTION: Site: US Bank ATM. Limited excavation of existing parking surface for electrical bore path. New structural slab, bollards, and stub-ups. New ATM kiosk and surround. Repair/replace fencing to match existing. 44 E BROADWAY BL FEE BALANCE: $ 429.00 Please pay at a minimum, the REVIEW category fees. A payment is required before your next submittal. ONLINE PAYMENTS **If amount doesn't match "Fee Balance", check back in a few hours** https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this field blank 4- "Continue" 5- In the Pay column - check the boxes 6- "Continue" YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab to see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. Title your SECOND submittal documents accordingly, example: 2_Comment Response Letter 3. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL to Filedrop: 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff - FILEDROP: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - "Existing Application" - "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff) - Select "PLANS" for all documents Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Certified Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov |