Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP22-0006
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/28/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 01/28/2022 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 01/28/2022 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 01/28/2022 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 02/15/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Development Package Comments: Sheet 1 1. Add C.A. types under project title in the top middle of the cover sheet. (i.e. Landscape, Grading, Drainage etc.) 2. Label all streets as either public or private and provide recording information (typ). 3. Center this project in the location map. 4. Add sewer cleanout to legend on sheet 1. 5. Provide sheet title in title block (typ). Sheet 2 6. Label width of multipurposed easement and all other easements (typ). Sheet 3 7. The common area access to lots 47 through 50 does not support the back-up requirements to service trash cans. 8. Please provide a cross section callout for entrance drives. Sheet 5 9. Add "streets and roads notes", "wastewater management notes", "trail notes" per am 2.06. Sheet 6 10. Label size, inverts and rims of all existing pipes, manholes, and cleanouts (typ). 11. Please provide WSEL and floodplain limits of the Julian wash. 12. Provide flowline elevations from the south to north basin. 13. Provide inlet/outlet inverts and pipe sizes. 14. Label the contours of the eastern channel (typ). 15. Please include the channel cross section in detail p on sheet 10. The section callout should otherwise be reduced. 16. Please provide top elevations for the "south basin" to demonstrate required freeboard is met. Sheet 7 17. Label contours and the WSEL for the western channel. 18. Are the southwest drainage improvements proposed? Add grading information for inlet connections. Sheet 10 19. Show lots 25 & 26 on either side of the secondary fire access lane section (L/10). Drainage Comments: 1. Section 4.2 - Please explain how the hydrograph was obtained for Reservoir-1 with a peak discharge of 208cfs to justify its peak not coinciding with the other calculated peak flows. 2. Figure 3 - Please include and label contours. 3. Section 5.3- Please include the culvert in the analysis of the Valencia channel as a boundary condition. 4. Section 8.1 - Please justify the 35% imperviousness used for the developed conditions calculations. Based on the 4-5000 sq.ft. lot sizes, I would expect 60-75% imperviousness account for the house and driveway envelope in addition to the roadways. Revise proposed conditions analyses if the results change. Review and Comments provided by third party engineer reviewers under contract with the City of Tucson. For Questions or Concerns contact: Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/16/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Assuming that the FFE is 8" above the pad elevation, revise the site drawing to indicate that backwater valves will not be required for lots 9, 10, and 11 because the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole is 12" or more below the proposed first floor elevations. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 02/17/2022 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | Email from: Howard Dutt To: CDRC Thu 2/17/2022 8:28 AM No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks and Recreation (520) 631-2030 |
| 02/22/2022 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approved | Approved. The letter can be viewed as a PDF. See the "Documents" section of PRO: "Tucson Airport Authority, approval letter, 02.22.22." |
| 02/28/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: The Reserve at Valencia Crossing Development Package (1st Review) DP22-0006 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 28, 2022 DUE DATE: February 22, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is January 16, 2023 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide the email address for the owner listed on sheet 1. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0006, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - Provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R) & .UDC ARTICLE 5.5 GATEWAY CORRIFOR ZONE (GCR)” 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 5. COMMENT: Per PAD-21 Section III.N provide design review written approve with your next submittal. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 03/03/2022 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | (The PLAN mentioned below can be viewed in the "Documents" section of PRO: "Pima Co Addressing review comments, first submittal, 03.02.22") Email from: <Addressing@pima.gov> To: CDRC Wed 3/2/2022 2:14 PM Pima County Addressing is returning The Reserve, 1st Submittal Review: DP22-0006 for corrections. Please see the plan for comments. Thank you Nicholas Jordan, Addressing Specialist Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 |
| 03/09/2022 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | Fire department access and dead-ends. You have an access road that exceeds 150' and the Cul-De-Sac shall be provided with a curb to curb radius of 96' Appendix D, IFC 2018. Fire department access lanes shall be 20' wide curb to curb confirm that the "FD access" only area meets this requirement. My measurement shows that it is shy of 20' Provide schematic for gate across the FD access lane and show that it meets Appendix D, IFC, 2018, Section D103.5 Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov TFD Fire Plans Examiner 520-837-7033 |
| 03/11/2022 | DSTIFFE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | DP22-0006 Comments 1. New concrete sidewalk in the ROW to be 5' and per P.A.G. standard 200 a. Sidewalk width to be 5' b. 3' buffer minimum between curb and sidewalk 2. New concrete curb in the ROW per P.A.G. standard 209 3. New curb access ramps in the ROW per P.A.G. standard 207 4. New curb returns on Littletown Rd. 18' minimum radius 5. New sidewalk scupper's in ROW per P.A.G. standard 204/ 205/ 205.5 6. Existing signs along Littletown Rd. to be relocated appropriately in relation to project design, with appropriate signpost foundation 7. Any existing sidewalk, curb or curb access ramps along Valencia road that are non-compliant, need to be appropriately made compliant with current standards David Stiffey David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/18/2022 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Email from: Jay Gomes <jgomes@azdot.gov> To: CDRC Fri 3/18/2022 3:29 PM ADOT had no comments on this DP. Jay Gomes Arizona Dept. of Transportation |
| 03/24/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Valencia Crossing ACTIVITY NO: DP22-0006 Address: 5251 E Littletown Zoning: PAD-21 Existing Use: undisturbed Sonoran Desert Proposed Use: SFR subdivision TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 24, 2022 DUE DATE: February 22, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 2. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 3. Please clearly differentiate between TOS trees vs. nursery grown plants on the landscape plans. 4. Please provide the species (or selection of species) for the Individual Lot Tree. 5. Prior to development plan permit issuance, a minor amendment to the Valencia Crossing PAD for the required landscape border along the east property line must be submitted and approved. 6. Please provide verification from Pima County Natural Resources that no additional vegetation or amenities are required on the north property line adjacent to the Julian Wash Trail. 7. Please label the existing and future rights of way for Littletown and Valencia Roads UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 8. Please provide an explanation and photos that explains why only about half the trees are considered viable for this site. 9. Check the NPP plan for alignment with symbols and plants, they seem to be skewed (see #10, 18, 19, 58, 60, 57, 36). Also, there seems to be some trees that are not labeled (northwest of #10). 10. Label the vegetation in the drainage easement along Valencia Rd to remain in place. 11. Please indicate the installation and location of a private submeter if a separate irrigation meter is not being provided. UDC Technical Standards 4-01.6.1.A.1. 12. Please note that smaller caliper trees can used for TOS and may be counted towards larger caliper tree quantities. 13. UDC 7.7.5 On- monitoring of all aspects of site clearing, grading, plant protection, preservation, salvage, and mitigation must be provided during project construction at the expense of the developer for all residential development that is over five acres and for all commercial and industrial development that is over one acre . The monitoring must be performed by an individual who is qualified in arid lands native plant resource identification and protection as specified in UDC Section 7.7.4.D, Professional Expertise. The monitor must provide periodic progress reports to the developer outlining the status of work accomplished and any problems encountered. A copy of these reports must be submitted to the PDSD for the project file. 14. UDC 7.7.6 The monitor is responsible for an assessment of the condition of the site’s plants one year after the final inspection has been performed on the site. The monitor shall visit the site and prepare a report on plant status, including general plant condition, the identification of plants under stress and the appropriate method to relieve the stress, and recommendations for replacement of plants that are dead or dying. Dead or dying plants must be replaced with the same size plant at a one-to-one ratio of like genus and species. Copies of the report must be submitted to the site owner/developer and to PDSD. The owner must respond to the plant needs as outlined in the status report within six months of report submittal or within a shorter period if required to improve the health of stressed plants and prevent plant loss. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/04/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | WRITE DECISION LETTER | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Brian Chimera cc: Steven Vasquez Mon 4/4/2022 11:43 AM REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP22-0006 DESCRIPTION: Tentative Plat/Floodplain/Swppp - The Reserve at Valencia Crossing. 5251 E LITTLETOWN RD FEE BALANCE: $ 3,748.88 Please pay at a minimum, the REVIEW category fees. A payment is required before your next submittal. ONLINE PAYMENTS If amount doesn't match "Fees Due", check back in a few hours https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this field blank 4- "Continue" 5- In the Pay column - check the boxes 6- "Continue" YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab to see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. Title your SECOND submittal documents accordingly, example: 2_Comment Response Letter 3. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL: 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff - FILEDROP: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - "Existing Application" - "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff) - Select "PLANS" for all documents Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Certified Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov |
| 04/04/2022 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | Email from: <TEPDEVREV@tep.com> To CDRC Fri 4/1/2022 12:26 PM Tucson Electric Power Co. (TEP) has reviewed the plans submitted January 22nd 2022, and has no objections at this time. Additional easements are required for TEP facilities if revisions are needed to the current design. They will need to be obtained by separate instrument. Tucson Electric Power Co. Land Resources Department |
| 04/04/2022 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Needs Review |