Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0362
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/11/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 01/27/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 02/01/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Hedricks – Multi-Family Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0362 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 1, 2022 DUE DATE: February 7, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is December 29, 2022. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.2 – Provide the scale for the Site Plan on sheet 1. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.3.8 – Provide a north arrow for all plans. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide a phone number for the Owner/Developer. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – The sheet # on sheet 2 appears to have two numbers and is difficult to read. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0362, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – The section corners on the location map are not correct. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – For the back-up spur shown at the north end of the vehicle parking area the distance from the face of curb to the building shall be 3’-0”, see UDC Article 7.4.6.F.5.c. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Demonstrate how a parking vehicle will be prevented from damaging the wall called out under Keynote 10 along the east side of the vehicle parking Area. Clearly show the 2’-6” dimension, see UDC Article 7.4.6.H. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Show the required 2’-6” dimension from the proposed short-term bicycle rack north to the building, see UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.g. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Demonstrate on the plan how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.e are met. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The interior perimeter yard setback requirements listed under General Note 8 are not correct. Per UDC TABLE 6.3-2.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE R-1, R-2, R-3, MH-1, & MH-2 ZONES, R-2 Zone, NonRes Use to Res Zone the required perimeter yard setback to the north, east & west property line is 10’-0” or ¾ (H) = Height of the proposed exterior building wall, the greater of the two dimensions applies. That all said, based on the wall heights of 9’-0” the minimum perimeter yard setback is 10’-0” not 6.75’ as shown on the plan. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The street perimeter yard setback requirements listed under General Note 8 are not correct. Per UDC Article 6.4.5.C.1.a Within established areas, the minimum required front street perimeter yard is 20 feet or one and one-half the height of the proposed wall (H), measured from the street property line, whichever is greater, up to a maximum of 90 feet. That all said, based on the wall heights of 9’-0” the minimum perimeter yard setback is 20’-0” not 13.50’ as shown on the plan. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.3.3.B all a sidewalk shall connect all buildings on the site. Show the required sidewalk between Building 1 & 2. This sidewalk shall also meet accessible requirements, TSM Section 7-01.3.2. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V – Demonstrate how mail service will be handled. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 02/11/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: The Hedrick ACTIVITY NO: DP21-0362 Parcel: 113-07-1300 Zoning: R-2 Existing Use: SFR Proposed Use: Multi-family residential TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 11, 2022 DUE DATE: February 7, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 2. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 3. The Unified Development Code (UDC) requires all new development or an expansion of less than 25% of an existing development submit a landscape plan, UDC 7.6.2. Preparation of the landscape plan shall adhere to UDC 7.6.4. and Administrative Manual 2-10. 4. A Native Plant Preservation Plan, Section 7.7.4, is required to be submitted and approved or a request for an exception from the Native Plant Preservation requirements approved in accordance with Sections 7.7.3.D.3 & .4 of the Unified Development Code (UDC) and Admin. Manual Section 2-11.0.0 prior to Grading Plan approval. 5. Please provide all landscape calculations on the landscape plan, including required trees for the parking areas, Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.A.2.c and landscape borders, UDC Technical Standards 2-10.4.2.f & g. 6. Please label the existing and future rights of way for Hedrick St UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 7. Placing trees along the edge of a parking area or at the ends of parking row does not meet the intent of the UDC. All spaces within 40’ of a tree is only one of the requirements, and it is required to meet all. The intent is to provide as much shade on the asphalt as possible, and the requirement is 1 tree per 4 parking spaces; trees are expected to be placed within the parking area itself to mitigate the heat and glare radiated by the built environment, UDC 7.6.1.A.3. Trees are to be distributed evenly throughout the parking area, UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a., UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2. 8. A 10’ street landscape border is required along Hedrick St, if existing vegetation is used to satisfy this requirement, identify and show on the landscape plan. The existing shrubs do not meet all the requirements. 9. Please add/call out soil moisture gauge/tensiometers and rain shut-off device on irrigation plans and details. UDC Tech Standards 4.01-2.A. 10. Please indicate the installation of a private submeter if a separate irrigation meter is not being provided. UDC Technical Standards 4-01.6.1.A.1. 11. Please add a detail to show depressed landscape areas or indicate with notes. 12. Per Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.D, provide page/detail reference to civil drawings/details that show bike racks, walkways, and screening/retaining walls on landscape plans. See civil drawing is not sufficient. 13. Provide a detail to show tree planting with root barrier adjacent to walkways. 14. Provide a maintenance schedule for the landscape and irrigation for this project. UDC 2-10-4.2.A.4., please be specific. The note on plans is incorrect. 15. A Commercial Rainwater Harvesting plan is required. Multi-family projects are commercial developments. UDC Technical Standards Manual – Section 4-01.0.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening. 16. Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention is required and shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-manual-board-version-201511.pdf 17. Grading, hydrology, and landscape plans must be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. UDC 7.6.6.C.2. The landscape, water harvesting, and grading plans must match. 18. Identify the point of drainage off roof areas, amount of flow, and disposition of flow. 19. Identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on water harvesting or landscape plans. 20. Please note that smaller caliper trees can used for TOS and may be counted towards larger caliper tree quantities. 21. UDC 7.7.5 On- monitoring of all aspects of site clearing, grading, plant protection, preservation, salvage, and mitigation must be provided during project construction at the expense of the developer for all residential development that is over five acres and for all commercial and industrial development that is over one acre . The monitoring must be performed by an individual who is qualified in arid lands native plant resource identification and protection as specified in UDC Section 7.7.4.D, Professional Expertise. The monitor must provide periodic progress reports to the developer outlining the status of work accomplished and any problems encountered. A copy of these reports must be submitted to the PDSD for the project file. 22. UDC 7.7.6 The monitor is responsible for an assessment of the condition of the site’s plants one year after the final inspection has been performed on the site. The monitor shall visit the site and prepare a report on plant status, including general plant condition, the identification of plants under stress and the appropriate method to relieve the stress, and recommendations for replacement of plants that are dead or dying. Dead or dying plants must be replaced with the same size plant at a one-to-one ratio of like genus and species. Copies of the report must be submitted to the site owner/developer and to PDSD. The owner must respond to the plant needs as outlined in the status report within six months of report submittal or within a shorter period if required to improve the health of stressed plants and prevent plant loss. 23. Add the following note to the Native Plant Preservation Plan - The site developer must include language in all contracts with contractors about the importance of staying out of all areas and away from all individual Protected Native Plants to be preserved-in-place. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/25/2022 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Buildings shall have fire sprinklers installed and shall show that the houses have a 3/4" meter for TW. Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033 |
| 03/23/2022 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | Needs Review | Email from: <Addressing@pima.gov> To: CDRC Wed 3/23/2022 10:35 AM This project still has a balance due of $219. The review will be scheduled after the review fees are paid. Thank you Nicholas Jordan Site Review Project Manager - Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 |
| 03/31/2022 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Add a note indicating the site is within a FEMA floodplain and floodplain use permits are required. 2. Add a note indicating elevation certificates are required for all new structures. |
| 04/04/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Peter Salonga Mon 4/4/2022 10:49 AM REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP21-0362 DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading/Floodplain - The Hedricks. Add two units to an existing two-unit development. 1613 E HEDRICK DR FEE BALANCE: $ 1,071.40 Please pay at a minimum, the REVIEW category fees. A payment is required before your next submittal. ONLINE PAYMENTS If amount doesn't match "Fees Due", check back in a few hours https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this field blank 4- "Continue" 5- In the Pay column - check the boxes 6- "Continue" YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab to see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL: 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your SECOND submittal documents accordingly, example: 2_Comment Response Letter FILEDROP: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - "Existing Application" - "Permit Number" field: enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff - Select "PLANS" for all documents Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Certified Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov |