Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP21-0361
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/08/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/18/2022 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | Approved | Email from: Nicholas Jordan <Nicholas.Jordan@pima.gov> To: CDRC Fri 7/15/2022 12:04 PM Pima County Addressing approves DP21-0361 Rooks Bellevue. Thank you Nicholas Jordan Site Review Project Manager - Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 |
| 07/25/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Rook Bellevue Homes – Multi-Family – R-3 Development Package (2nd Review) DP21-0361 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 25, 2022 DUE DATE: July 29, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is December 9, 2022. 1. This comment was not addressed correctly. Sheets 6-8 show the case number as DP21-03618. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0361, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. This comment was not addressed correctly. As there are no parcels proposed for each unit this site is considered to be multi-family and is subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.6. Revise General Note 4 to shown the correct use along with the use specific standards. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Provide a general note that identifies the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 3. Zoning acknowledges your response clearly show the carports and parking spaces on the plan. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation states that there are 41 space provided but only 22 shown on the plan. 4. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a typical parking space detail for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. 5. This comment was not addressed correctly. Per ICC A117.1-2009 Section 502.2 when the access aisle is 5’-0” wide the van accessible space is 11’-0” wide. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Per 2018 IBC Chapter 11 Section 1106.5 a van accessible parking space shall be provided for every six of fraction of six accessible parking spaces, at least one will be van accessible. This van accessible space shall meet the requirements of ICC A117.1-2009 Section 502. 6. The comment was not addressed correctly. The bicycle parking calculation shall show the number required and provided for both the short- & long-term bicycle parking. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The bicycle parking calculation is not correct. Per UDC Table 7.4.8-1: Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces, RESIDENTIAL USE GROUP, Multifamily Dwellings and Group Dwelling, short- & long-term bicycle parking is required. Provide a short- & long-term bicycle parking space calculation on the plan. 7. This comment was not fully addressed. Detail 1 sheet 3 does not demonstrate compliance with UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.e, 7.4.9.B.2.b, 7.4.9.B.2.f, & 7.4.9.B.2.h. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a detail for the short- & long-term bicycle parking that demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B, .C & .D are met. Detail 1 sheet 3 does not meet these requirements. 8. This comment was not fully addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Per UDC Article 6.4.5.C.1.a Within established areas , the minimum required front street perimeter yard is 20 feet or one and one-half the height of the proposed wall (H), measured from the street property line, whichever is greater, up to a maximum of 90 feet. Based on the 25’ height provided under “SITE INFORMATION” the requirement front street perimeter yard setback is 37’-6”, proposes front street perimeter yard setback is 20.0’. A Design Development Option (DDO) must be submitted and approved to reduce the required setback, DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/DDO_for_Setback_and_Height_UDC_8.11.20.pdf. A DDO is a separate submittal from the building plan and shall be submitted at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd-filedrop, using the Submission Type “Zoning Administration”. If you have questions about the DDO application or process please contact Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov. 9. This comment was not fully addressed COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Per UDC Article 6.3.3.C a multi-family development is considered non-residential for the purpose of applying dimensional standards. Per UDC TABLE 6.3-2.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE R-1, R-2, R-3, MH-1, & MH-2 ZONES, R-3 Zone, the required perimeter yard setback to the north and east property line is 10’ or ¾ (H), Height of the proposed exterior building wall. Perimeter yard setbacks are based on a measurement from design grade to the highest point of the exterior wall UDC Article 6.4.5.B & Figure 6.4.5-A. Based on the 25’ height provided under “SITE INFORMATION” the requirement perimeter yard setback to the north & east property line is 18’-9”, proposed setback to the north property line is 17.1’ and to the east is 16.7”. A Design Development Option (DDO) must be submitted and approved to reduce the required setback. 10. This comment was not fully addressed, provide the height and use within the footprint. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage, height, and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 11. Zoning acknowledges your response but until comment 4 is addressed and shows the wheel stops along with a dimension for the location of the wheel shop shown Zoning cannot verify that the sidewalk width is met. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – As vehicles are allowed to over-hang the 5’-0” sidewalk along the west side of the vehicle parking area, demonstrate that the 2’-6” over-hang requirement, shown under UDC Article 7.4.6.h.3 does not reduce the sidewalk width to less than 4’-0”, see TSM Section 7-01.4.3.A. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 08/05/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Rook-Bellevue Homes ACTIVITY NO: Dp21-0361 Address: 6207 E Bellevue St Zoning: R-3 Existing Use: vacant property Proposed Use: Multi-family residential TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 5, 2022 DUE DATE: July 29, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. The plans indicate salvaging 10” and 12” caliper trees. Larger trees do not tend to survive salvaging. Please revise mitigation calculations as well as add trees to the landscape plan. 2. Rook Avenue requires 2 additonal trees. Please provide landscape calculations for required trees for the parking areas, Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.A.2.c and landscape borders, UDC Technical Standards 2-10.4.2.f & g. This comment was not addressed adequately. There are two diamonds in the parking area, but no trees in them. UDC 7.6.1.A.3, UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a., UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2. 3. This comment was not addressed - Please indicate the installation of a private submeter if a separate irrigation meter is not being provided. UDC Technical Standards 4-01.6.1.A.1. 4. LA and Engineer - This comment was not addressed - A Commercial Rainwater Harvesting plan is required. Multi-family projects are commercial developments. UDC Technical Standards Manual – Section 4-01.0.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening. 5. LA and Engineer - This comment was not addressed - Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention is required and shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-manual-board-version-201511.pdf 6. LA and Engineer - This comment was not addressed - Grading, hydrology, and landscape plans must be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plans shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. UDC 7.6.6.C.2. The landscape, water harvesting, and grading/drainage plans must match. 7. LA and Engineer - This comment was not addressed - Identify the point of drainage off roof areas, amount of flow, and disposition of flow. 8. LA and Engineer - This comment was not addressed - Identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on grading plans, water harvesting or landscape plans. 9. LA and Engineer - This comment was not addressed - Indicate basin inlets/outlets on both landscape and water harvesting plans. Provide spot elevations. 10. This comment was not adequately addressed – Show where hydroseed is being installed. Decomposed granite is prohibited on basin floors, unless 4” or greater in size, hydroseed is allowed. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff |
| 08/22/2022 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/30/2022 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Clearly show vertical separation between the vehicle use areas and the sidewalks except at driveway locations. 2. Clarify in the plan view that the driveways will have a grade break providing a pedestrian path with a maximum cross slope of 2 per cent. 3. Provide scuppers for the drainage crossing the sidewalks. 4. Maximize water harvesting in all landscape areas. Please let me know when the plans are submitted again so we can review as quickly as possible. Let me know if you have any questions. Loren Makus loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/31/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | email from: COTDSDPermits To: Andie Hemmah cc: Francis Hemmah 08/31/2022 REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP21-0361 Site/Grading - Rook Bellevue Homes. Multi-family with single family units. 6207 E BELLEVUE ST FEE BALANCE: $ 165.00 (2nd submittal review by Fire Dept, 2 hours) ONLINE PAYMENTS ** If the online amount doesn't match "Fee Balance" above, check again in a few hours ** https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this blank 4- "Continue" 5- In the Pay column - check the boxes YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. Title your THIRD submittal documents accordingly, example: 3_Comment Response Letter 3. UPLOAD documents to Filedrop: - Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) - Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) - Documents requested by review staff FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - "Existing Application" - "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff) Sharon Beasley, Certified Permit Technician City of Tucson, Planning & Development Services Dept. Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (for development packages, land splits, Thursday Presubmittal meetings) Email: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov (for building permits) |