Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0344
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/12/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Take Five Oil Change Facility – 850 W Irvington St. Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0344 TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 12, 2022 DUE DATE: January 19, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is December 14, 2022. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0344, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.2 – As this site is part of a larger site provide the gross area for the entire site. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The use specific standards listed under Zoning and Land Use Notes 4 are not correct. Review UDC TABLE 4.8-4: PERMITTED USES - COMMERCIAL AND MIXED-USE ZONES and provided the correct standards. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – Provide a building area expansion calculation on the plan. This calculation shall include the building square footage of DP21-0167. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – As this site is part of a larger site the vehicle parking spaces calculation shall include the entire site. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Detail 6 sheet 6 references “CLASS II” bicycle parking and should reference short-term. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Under “DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE” “BUILDNG HEIGHT ALLOWED” 30’ is not correct. Review UDC TABLE 6.3-4.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE C-1, C-2, C-3, OCR-1, & OCR-2 ZONES, C-2 Zone and provide the correct allowed height. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A At least one sidewalk is required to a project from each street on which the project has frontage, show the required sidewalk out to the sidewalk along Irvington. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.3.3 a sidewalk is required to connect all buildings on site. Clearly demonstrate how the connection is provided to the building proposed under DP21-0167. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also provided a general note stating “ALL SIGNAGE REQUIRES SEPARATE PERMITS”. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 01/13/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Take 5 Oil Change ACTIVITY NO: DP21-0344 Address: 902 W Irvington Rd Zoning: C-2 Existing Use: parking, parking lanes, landscape islands Proposed Use: Automotive, Minor Service TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 13, 2022 DUE DATE: January 19, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 2. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 3. The Unified Development Code (UDC) requires all new development or an expansion of less than 50 % of an existing development submit a landscape plan, UDC 7.6.2. Preparation of the landscape plan shall adhere to UDC 7.6.4. and Administrative Manual 2-10. 4. The width/coverage calculations in the Plant Legend are incorrect. 5. The street landscape border trees need to be near the street, up to 5’ of right of way can be used to avoid utilities if necessary. 6. Placing trees along the edge of a parking area or at the ends of parking row does not meet the intent of the UDC. All spaces within 40’ of a tree is only one of the requirements, and all must be met. The intent is to provide as much shade on the asphalt as possible, and the requirement is 1 tree per 4 parking spaces; trees are expected to be placed within the parking area itself to mitigate the heat and glare radiated by the built environment, UDC 7.6.1.A.3. Trees are to be distributed evenly throughout the parking area, canopy trees planted within and adjacent to vehicular use areas should be planted in a manner that at maturity they afford the greatest amount of shade to the paved areas. UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a., UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2. 7. Please add/call out soil moisture gauge/tensiometers and rain shut-off device on irrigation plans and details. UDC Tech Standards 4.01-2.A. 8. Provide a maintenance schedule for the landscape and irrigation for this project. UDC 2-10-4.2.A.4., please be specific. 9. Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention is required and shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-manual-board-version-201511.pdf 10. Grading, hydrology, and landscape plans must be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. UDC 7.6.6.C.2. The landscape, water harvesting, and grading plans must match. 11. Identify the point of drainage off roof areas, amount of flow, and disposition of flow. 12. Identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on water harvesting or landscape plans. 13. Indicate basin inlets/outlets on both landscape and water harvesting plans. Provide spot elevations. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 01/19/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (3296-01). Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 01/20/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Development Package Comments: Sheet 1 1. Please provide name and contact information of firm/individual who prepared the geotechnical report. 2. Please provide basis of Bearing and Elevation according to Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06.4.8. 3. General Note #11: Please check Spelling for "Located". 4. This project has a designated dumpster area. Please provide waste stream calculations. Sheet 2 5. Please add and label asphalt saw cut lines to drawing on all necessary sheets. 6. Please either add to legend or label all existing utilities/structures (such as "st" pipe, existing pole to remain, existing water valve, electric pedestal, detention/retention basin, existing wall). 7. Pleat label all utilities as existing and to be remove or to remain. Sheet 3 8. Please label proposed berm east of project site. 9. Please label proposed basin. 10. Please provide and label all necessary pedestrian crosswalk paths shown by detail 7 sheet 6. paths should tie to adjacent sidewalks, connect parking to building, and building to trash enclosure. 11. Please clarify the intent of Lot 6 and how its use may be affected by this development. Removal of the access lane in the south will restrict access and turnaround requirements for fire department. 12. Please provide new vertical curb where the old Lot 6 access lane has been cut to prevent cars from driving into basin. Sheet 4 13. Please provide WSEL for the proposed basin. 14. The top elevation of the basin should include an appropriate freeboard which is not included in the ponding depth. Please revise. 15. The water harvesting and grading plans must match. The water harvesting plan shows a curb cut/opening on the south end of the site. Please show this also on the grading plan and site plan. 16. All the landscape areas should be depressed 6-9 inches, please show this on the grading plan by note, label, or spot grades. 17. Show the point of drainage off the roof area and direction of flow. Sheet 5 18. Key notes # 2,3,4,5 do not appear on Utility Plan. Please revise. Sheet 12 19. Please provide perimeter control at the proposed basin. 20. Please label existing basin. 21. Update additional notes to reference 2020 general permit and elsewhere as needed. 22. Please list detail references for all BMPs listed in legend. Drainage Report Comments: 1. Page 3 - Section 2.2 Onsite4 Hydrology- Please note the City will accept the use of the PC Hydro Version 3.0 for this report but will no longer accept outdated versions in the future. 2. Page 3 - Section 2.2 - Please revise discussion of Cw values to match the calculations. 3. Page 4 - Please be more specific and state the total site impervious percentage and total hydrologic soil type percentages. 4. Page 4 - Last two paragraphs reflect different storm events evaluated and differ from the event stated as being evaluated in previous discussion. Please revise to be consistent. 5. Page 5 - For both equations provided, please include definitions for all variables in the equations. Please also include an excerpt from the software manual used. 6. Page 5 - Rainfall amount stated as an aerial reduced value. The contributing drainage area does not justify aerial reduction. Please verify the calculation did not use an aerial reduction or adjust calculations as necessary. 7. Page 5 - Please see comment on Page 4 regarding varying storm events. 8. Page 6 - Please explain why the sum of proposed peak discharges is less than that of existing with more impervious area. 9. Page 7 - Please confirm the basin "will" be modified prior to construction of this site or has already been modified to account for this parcel. 10. Page 7 - Please describe the area drainage to the water harvesting basin and how it will get there and/or add flow arrows to Figure 4 as the contour shown does not clearly indicate the drainage pattern. Please also explain the overflow drainage path. 11. Page 7 - Development standard 3. Please clarify total depth for water harvesting basin. 12. Page 7 - Development standard 4. Please explain how the water is evacuated within 24 hours. 13. Page 8- In section 3.1, please define a major storm event that requires inspection to occur and how the owner determines the amount of rainfall that occurred. 14. Page 9 - Please explain how the no impact determination was made for sections 5.3 and 5.4. 15. Page 10 - Inspection period of every 3 years in Section 6 differed from every 24 months stated on Page 8 and the annual inspection stated below the 1st paragraph. Please review and revise report as necessary for a consistent approach. 16. Page 11 - Please revise various portions of text describing maintenance of vegetation within the basins as statement appear to conflict with each other. 17. Page 11 - Maintenance discussion related to basin roughness coefficient provides not description of a coefficient in this report or detail on how a change would be determined. Text appears to be possibly extracted from another report and not applicable to this project. Please review and provide clarification as necessary. 18. Page 12 - Water harvesting basin maintenance. Please provide a specific max sediment accumulation before maintenance is required since as mentioned the basin for this project is limited in depth and is required to provide a specific volume. 19. Page 13 - First sentence which is carried over from the previous page state that "therefore satisfying City of Tucson requirements". The statement of how the site drainage works does not draw any conclusions, please revise sentence. 20. Figure 1 - Scale is incorrect. Appears to be 1.5"=1mile. Please check and revise as necessary. 21. Figure 3 - Please provide enough offsite contours to verify the watershed delineation. 22. Figure 4 - Note in center of page references a grading plan sheet not included in this report. Please remove note or include sheet. 23. Figure 4 - Slope percentages are missing arrows showing direction, please add arrows. 24. Figure 4 - Please explain purpose of berm if any in text. 25. Figure 4 - Please add basin volume and WSEL. Review and Comments provided by third party engineer reviewers under contract with the City of Tucson. For Questions or Concerns contact: Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/17/2022 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/22/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Linda Thompson Tue 2/22/2022 8:52 AM REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP21-0344 DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading/SWPPP - Take Five Oil Change Facility. 850 W IRVINGTON RD FEE BALANCE: $ 2,778.98 Please pay at a minimum, the REVIEW category fees. A payment is required before your next submittal. ONLINE PAYMENT If amount doesn't match "Fees Due", check back in a few hours https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this field blank 4- "Continue" 5- In the Pay column - check the boxes 6- "Continue" YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab to see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL and include: 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your SECOND submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter FILEDROP for your Resubmittal https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - Select "Existing Application" - In the "Permit Number" field, enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff - Select "PLANS" for all documents for quicker downloading of your documents on our end Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Building Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov |
| 12/24/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed |