Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP21-0343
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/24/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/22/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Walk-In Cooler Addition – Mexico Lindo Development Package (2nd Review) DP21-0343 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 22, 2022 DUE DATE: June 17, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is January 4, 2023. 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. This comment was not fully addressed. Remove the aerial photo from sheet A.1. and clearly shown all vehicle parking spaces on the plan. COMMENT: 2-06.2.2 – Remove the aerial photo from the Proposed Site plan and clearly show all required items on the plan, i.e. vehicle & bicycle parking locations, pedestrian circulation etc. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. The percentage of expansion is not correct and should be 22%. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – Provide a building area expansion calculation on the plans. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 3. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide a width dimension for the existing right-of-way, paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C - The following information for Valencia Rd & Missiondale Rd shall be provided: type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 4. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 5. This comment was not fully addressed. Clearly shown all vehicle parking spaces and provide dimensions for the PAALs, access lanes, vehicle parking spaces etc. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide fully dimensioned vehicle use areas. 6. This comment was not addressed correctly. The proposed “BIKE RACKS” do not appear to meet the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B, .C & .D. A bike rack cannot meet the requirements for long-term bicycle parking. Provide a detail for both the short- & long-term bicycle parking that demonstrates that the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B, .C & .D are met. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a short- & long-term bicycle parking space calculation on the plan. At a minimum per UDC Table 7.4.8-1: Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces, RETAIL TRADE USE GROUP, Retail Trade Uses Less Than 50,000 sq. ft. GFA 2 short- & 2 long-term spaces are required. 7. This comment was not addressed. Provide the future curb & sidewalk location on the plan. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.J – As Valencia Rd is designated as an Arterial Gateway of the COT MS&R map and street dedication is not required or proposed draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) 8. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the height of the existing building and proposed cooler within the footprint. 9. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.2.B.1 the following apply to the proposed cooler only: a. TSM Section 7-01.4.A a sidewalk is required from the cooler to both streets. b. TSM Section 7-01.3.3.B a sidewalk must connect the cooler to the existing building. c. All sidewalks shall meet the requirements of TSM 7-01.4.3. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 06/24/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Talbott Denny cc: J Dan Fri 6/24/2022 1:10 PM REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP21-0343 Project Description: SITE - Mexico Lindo. Addition of detached (pre-built) walk-in cooler on top of existing concrete pad. 50 W VALENCIA RD Fee Balance: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. Title your THIRD submittal documents accordingly, example: 3_Comment Response Letter 3. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL to Filedrop: - Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) - Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) - Any other documents requested by review staff FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - "Existing Application" - "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff) - Select "PLANS" for all documents Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Certified Building Technician City of Tucson, Planning & Development Services Dept. Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (for development packages, land splits, Thursday Presubmittal meetings) Email: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov (for building permits) |