Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0343
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/12/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 01/12/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed | Engineering review not required. This was passed by Loren Makus during the OK to Submit. |
| 01/27/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Walk-In Cooler Addition – Mexico Lindo Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0343 TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 27, 2022 DUE DATE: February 01, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is January 4, 2023. 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.2.2 – Remove the aerial photo from the Proposed Site plan and clearly show all required items on the plan, i.e. vehicle & bicycle parking locations, pedestrian circulation etc. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.2.4 – The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Remove sheets A.2 & A.3 from the DP as they are not site related and will not be reviewed. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 3. COMMENT: 2-06.3.3 – The text provided on the proposed site plan is too small and difficult to read. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – Revise the drawing index once comment 1 is addressed. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – Provide the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0343, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three-inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.A – The location map shall show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area; 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – The section corners; and the scale will be labeled on the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As Valencia Rd is designated as an Arterial Gateway of the COT MS&R map provide a general not stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R) & .UDC ARTICLE 5.5 GATEWAY CORRIFOR ZONE (GCR)” 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – Clarify why there is a difference in floor area, 3,495 sq. ft. as shown on last approved site plan T11CM03254, and the existing building 4,049 shown on this plan. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – Provide a building area expansion calculation on the plans. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – If applicable all easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C - The following information for Valencia Rd & Missiondale Rd shall be provided: type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F – Provide the zoning for the parcels to the north and across both right-of-ways on the plan. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide fully dimensioned vehicle use areas. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. Per UDC TABLE 7.4.4-1: MINIMUM NUMBER OF MOTOR VEHICLE SPACES REQUIRED, RETAIL TRADE USE GROUP, the required number of vehicle parking spaces is based on 1 space per 300 sq. ft. of GFA. 21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a short- & long-term bicycle parking space calculation on the plan. At a minimum per UDC Table 7.4.8-1: Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces, RETAIL TRADE USE GROUP, Retail Trade Uses Less Than 50,000 sq. ft. GFA 2 short- & 2 long-term spaces are required. 22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.J – As Valencia Rd is designated as an Arterial Gateway of the COT MS&R map and street dedication is not required or proposed draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) 23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the height of the existing building and proposed cooler within the footprint. 24. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.2.B.1 the following apply to the proposed cooler only: a. TSM Section 7-01.4.A a sidewalk is required from the cooler to both streets. b. TSM Section 7-01.3.3.B a sidewalk must connect the cooler to the existing building. c. All sidewalks shall meet the requirements of TSM 7-01.4.3. 25. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.S – Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 01/31/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 02/25/2022 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/28/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Talbott Denny Mon 2/28/2022 9:15 AM REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP21-0343 DESCRIPTION: SITE - Mexico Lindo. Addition of detached (pre-built) walk-in cooler on top of existing concrete pad. 50 W VALENCIA RD FEE BALANCE: $ 346.50 Please pay at a minimum, the REVIEW category fees. A payment is required before your next submittal. ONLINE PAYMENT If amount doesn't match "Fees Due", check back in a few hours https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this field blank 4- "Continue" 5- In the Pay column - check the boxes 6- "Continue" YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab to see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL and include: 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your SECOND submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter FILEDROP: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - Select "Existing Application" - In the "Permit Number" field, enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff - Select "PLANS" for all documents for quicker downloading of your documents on our end Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Building Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov |