Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP21-0340
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/05/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/14/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Stockett Tile & Granite Development Package (3rd Review) DP21-0340 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 14, 2022 DUE DATE: July 20, 2022 This comment was not addressed. COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is December 12, 2022. 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.2.2 – The development package shall be submitted as a single multi-page pdf file. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. This comment was not addressed. Per UDC TABLE 4.8-5: PERMITTED USES – INDUSTRIAL ZONES, Industrial Land Use Group With Land Use Class/Type: General Manufacturing in the I-1 Zone is subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.5.C.2, .6, .7, & .8 and 4.9.13.Q. Provide these standards within the Site Date Table. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The current and proposed uses listed in the Site Data Table are not uses classified per the UDC. Provide the uses based on the UDC and if applicable provide any Use Specific Standards. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 3. Zoning acknowledges the submitted covenant but this covenant will need to be recorded, provide a copy of the recordation information with the next submittal. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A – As this site is made up of two (2) parcels, 107-07-005H & 107-04-002C, a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combo Request from with your next submittal. 4. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Per UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.a.(1) an access lane must be setback 1’-0” from an open structure. Show the required 1’-0” setback from the canopies called out under Keynote 13, clearly show the access land width, and clearly demonstrate that the required 2’ setback to the perimeter fence is met, see UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.b. 5. This comment was not addressed. Demonstrate how vehicles will be prevented from damaging the vegetation along the east side of the access lane that provided access to this site. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Per UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines , to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. Clearly demonstrate that this requirement is met throughout the site. 6. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide an access lane width dimension from the evap coolers shown along the east side of the proposed building to ramp shown along the west side of the existing building. Show the required 2’-0” setback from the evap coolers to the access lane and if there is a rail or some other type of vertical obstruction along the ramp show the required 2’-0” setback to the access lane, see UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.b 7. This comment was not addressed correctly. The provided bicycle parking space calculation is not correct. Clearly show that the requirement is for “LONG-TERM” bicycle parking and per UDC Table 7.4.8-1: Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces, INDUSTRIAL USE GROUP the minimum requirement is 2 spaces. The racks called out under Keynote 17 do not meet the Long-term bicycle parking requirement, see UDC Article 7.4.9.D. Also, no detail was provided. Provide a bicycle parking spaces calculation the provides the number required and provided. The bicycle parking provided does not meet the requirements for the required long-term bicycle parking. As 2 long-term bicycle parking spaces are required provide a detail that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1, B.2 & D are met. If you wish to leave the short-term racks as shown on the plan provide a detail that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1, B.2 & C, are met. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Until comment 6 has been addressed short- & long-term bicycle parking requirements cannot be verified. If short- or long-term bicycle parking is required clearly show the location on the plan and provide a detail. 8. This comment was not addressed correctly. The pedestrian refuge area shall run along the entire north side of the building. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.3.3.B.1 & 7-01.4.1.B provide a 4’-0” wide pedestrian refuge area along the north side of the proposed building. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nocholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 07/29/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Stockett Tile and Granite ACTIVITY NO: DP21-0340 v3 Parcel: 107-04-002C Zoning: I-1 Existing Use: General Manufacturing Proposed Use: General Manufacturing TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 29, 2022 DUE DATE: July 19, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. Landscape, irrigation and commercial water harvesting plans are required. 7.6.2.B.2 Buildings 10,000 Square Feet or Less On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building (s) is 10,000 square feet or less, expansions in square footage of land area, floor area , lot coverage , or vehicular use area as follows. a. If the expansion is less than 50%, the standards of this section apply only to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning standards in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval. b. If the expansion is 50% or greater or if expansions as of February 15, 1991, cumulatively result in a 50% or greater expansion in land area, floor area , lot coverage , or vehicular use area , the standards of this section apply to the entire site 1. Engineers Comment - First-flush volumes cannot be stored underground unless prior approval is obtained. See PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention. 2. Revise Landscape Grading/Water Harvesting notes regarding water harvesting basin depth, Page 6 is the irrigation plan. 3. Revise notes regarding d.g. 6” of rock in planting areas will suffocate the roots. It is acceptable to have 4” of mulch or compost with 2” of d.g., less expensive too. 4. This comment was not adequately addressed - Please provide all landscape calculations on the landscape plan, including required trees for the parking areas, Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.A.2.c. 5. This comment was not adequately addressed - Please indicate the installation of a private submeter if a separate irrigation meter is not being provided. UDC Technical Standards 4-01.6.1.A.1. 6. This comment was not adequately addressed - Please add a detail to show depressed landscape areas or indicate with notes. 7. Provide a detail to show tree planting with root barrier adjacent to walkways. 8. A This comment was not adequately addressed - Commercial Rainwater Harvesting plan is required. UDC Technical Standards Manual – Section 4-01.0.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening. Demonstrate how water harvesting is being maximized. 9. This comment was not adequately addressed - The grading plan and water harvesting plan do not meet the requirements of the water harvesting ordinance and technical standard. The plan doesn't show the effective use of run-off to supplement irrigation. a. The catchment areas must provide water to the infiltration areas. Revise the grading to direct runoff to the landscape infiltration areas to the maximum extent possible. b. Catchment areas in the water harvesting table can only count the areas that are directed to the landscape infiltration areas. c. Clearly show the areas in each catchment area and the areas of effective infiltration and water harvesting. All landscape areas should be included within infiltration areas. d. UDC section 7.6.6.C requires the use of all runoff to supplement irrigation. Show how this is attained. e. Provide a planting inventory or some other mechanism so we can confirm the canopy areas for each water harvesting infiltration area. Ensure all on-site landscape areas are accounted in the canopy area. f. Show rooftop drainage patterns and show how they are incorporated into the water harvesting calculations. g. Water harvesting areas should be depressed between 6 and 9 inches. These areas can be counted toward first flush retention requirements. 10. This comment was not adequately addressed - Identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on water harvesting or landscape plans. 16. This comment was not adequately addressed - Provide a maintenance schedule for the landscape and irrigation for this project. UDC 2-10-4.2.A.4., please be specific. 18. Grading, hydrology, and landscape plans must be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. UDC 7.6.6.C.2. The landscape, water harvesting, and grading plans must match. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/24/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See previous comments not addressed from 3/16/2022 1. Per the amendments to the detention/retention manual, the developed conditions must provide a 15 percent reduction in peak discharges. Revise the drainage report accordingly. Ensure the proposed project meets the expansion standard of the retention/detention manual. 2. This site is within an area identified by the City Engineer to be subject to flooding in a 100-year flood event. Determine the base flood elevation for the site and show the lowest floor at the regulatory flood elevation. 3. Show construction details for drainage/water harvesting basins. Show side slopes, stabilization, curb openings for inlets and outlets and other features. 4. Show roof drainage patterns and disposition of roof discharges. Ensure pedestrian routes are kept flood free for up to a 10 year event. 5. Show curbs or other barriers to keep vehicles within the vehicle use areas. Loren Makus loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/25/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Victor O. 08/25/2022 REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP21-0340 Site/Grading - Stockett Tile and Granite. 1401 W GLENN ST FEE BALANCE: $ 165.00 (additional review time by Fire Dept) ONLINE PAYMENTS ** If the online amount doesn't match "Fee Balance" above, check again in a few hours ** https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this blank 4- "Continue" 5- In the Pay column - check the boxes YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. Title your FOURTH submittal documents accordingly, example: 4_Comment Response Letter 3. UPLOAD documents to Filedrop: - Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) - Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) - Any other documents requested by review staff FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - "Existing Application" - "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff) Sharon Beasley, Certified Permit Technician City of Tucson, Planning & Development Services Dept. Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (for development packages, land splits, Thursday Presubmittal meetings) Email: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov (for building permits) |